Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2012, 12:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orange Country, CA
Posts: 102

Fiesta - '12 Ford Fiesta SE
90 day: 31.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I am quite impressed with the SkyActive and EcoBoost that are out there, direct injection, turbo/supercharging, and even higher CRs.

I just filled up with 87 octane and it cost $4.199/gal, about average for OC, and there is no ethanol free stations anywhere.

After this tank I'll try a tank of 91 and see if there's a noticeable difference.

Thanks for all the info!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2012, 10:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...here's an OSU college 'thesis' paper on the subject that's worth reading:

https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/...ate_Thesis.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 09:26 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154

Whitey - '10 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 33.74 mpg (US)

Hershey - '13 Nissan Altima SL
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Midas - '10 Toyota Prius two
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
about the atkinson cycle engine. I thought the big deal with it was that the connecting rods also cycled so a cylinder had a combustion event every 360 degrees of crank rotation. (Versus the 720 degrees with the otto cycle) But atkinson cycles are low on power/high on efficiency since the full compression isn't fully used.

and a miller cycle engine leaves the intake valves open until the combustion event so a supercharger keeps packing the cylinder. So the static compression ratio is useless here as well, and so is the dynamic (since the valve is open almost to top dead center)
__________________


Check out my facebook page, if you feel like watching my progress.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MPGran...007268?sk=wall
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 09:45 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPGranger View Post
about the atkinson cycle engine. I thought the big deal with it was that the connecting rods also cycled so a cylinder had a combustion event every 360 degrees of crank rotation. (Versus the 720 degrees with the otto cycle) But atkinson cycles are low on power/high on efficiency since the full compression isn't fully used.
Atkinson is still a four cycle engine with power stroke every 720 degrees.

Quote:
and a miller cycle engine leaves the intake valves open until the combustion event so a supercharger keeps packing the cylinder. So the static compression ratio is useless here as well, and so is the dynamic (since the valve is open almost to top dead center)
Increased static compression ratio = increased expansion ratio (regardless of intake valve timing), so static still means a lot when it comes to efficiency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 06:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154

Whitey - '10 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 33.74 mpg (US)

Hershey - '13 Nissan Altima SL
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Midas - '10 Toyota Prius two
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
HowStuffWorks "How an Atkinson Cycle Engine Works"
Animated Engines - Atkinson

I should have mentioned that the atkinson achieved 4 strokes with only 360 degrees of the crank due to some tricky connecting rods and linkages

But Mazda's skyactivD (2.2L diesel) lowered compression to a measelly 14:1, but improved FE. So wouldn't that suggest that there are diminishing returns for just bumping up compression ratio?
__________________


Check out my facebook page, if you feel like watching my progress.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MPGran...007268?sk=wall
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 06:31 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154

Whitey - '10 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 33.74 mpg (US)

Hershey - '13 Nissan Altima SL
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Midas - '10 Toyota Prius two
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Low CR engines use lower octane fuel because the octane rating is about Knock AKA predetonation. Modern high compression engines have variable timing and ignition and so forth just in case you use lower than optimal octane rating so you don't do damage to your engine. This protection, however, will cost you some FE.

In summary, an engine that doesn't need higher octane won't become more efficient with higher octane.

HowStuffWorks "What does octane mean?"

Also some gas brands put additional cleaning additives in just their high octane fuel to help sell their more expensive dino-juice. Their are also top-tier gasoline brands that put additional cleaners in all their gas choices. But relax, in the US, their are additives that must be in the gas already.
__________________


Check out my facebook page, if you feel like watching my progress.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MPGran...007268?sk=wall
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 11:20 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ERTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 130

Bu - '08 Chevrolet Malibu LS
90 day: 32.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 73 Times in 36 Posts
Yamaha 5 valve tech will not knock - 93 octane with 13.5:1 cr! The corvette LT5 was said to run fine on 87 octane with 11:1 cr.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 05:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERTW View Post
Yamaha 5 valve tech will not knock - 93 octane with 13.5:1 cr! The corvette LT5 was said to run fine on 87 octane with 11:1 cr.
A lot of recent engineering has gone into homogenous charge, better mixing of the fuel and air within the combustion chamber. That, coupled with better 'active' fuel/spark controls I think is what allow today's engines to use higher compression ratios with relatively low octane fuels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 04:21 PM   #19 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
That said, I have heard rumors that Honda's LEA series will adjust for higher octane and they are 'only' 10.8:1. The number I heard was 100 RON which should be about 94-95 AKI octane.

__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com