Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2019, 02:57 PM   #371 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Very impressive!


On a scale of 1-10, how frustrating is that 6th gear issue? (The lost MPGs would be driving me nuts.)

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-23-2019, 03:03 PM   #372 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Very impressive!


On a scale of 1-10, how frustrating is that 6th gear issue? (The lost MPGs would be driving me nuts.)
Probably a 5 or 6, it's as much the fuel economy as the increase in highway noise - it drones a bit in 5th but is quiet in 6th. Around town it's less of an issue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2019, 02:43 PM   #373 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
If I lost 6th in my stock TSX and couldn't get it back, I'd give the car away. It's already way too short as it is... on second thought, I'd strip it and make a track car out of it. 6th is useless on the track. There isn't a straight long enough to get to it.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2019, 03:02 PM   #374 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
If I lost 6th in my stock TSX and couldn't get it back, I'd give the car away. It's already way too short as it is... on second thought, I'd strip it and make a track car out of it. 6th is useless on the track. There isn't a straight long enough to get to it.
Well recall there's the 3.4 final drive. Even taking tire size into account, your 6th is between my 4th and 5th.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2019, 03:09 PM   #375 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
I know, just trying to relate something that is mostly unrelated. There aren't many TSXs out there, so any topic discussing anything about it has my interest. It's also me reiterating my frustration with the gearing yet again. 6th is useless on the track from a "sportiness" perspective, and nearly useless as a cruising gear since it revs so high. Acura could have left 1-5 for sportiness, and 6th useful for fuel economy, but they didn't. The automatic has a better fuel economy rating due to the better cruising gearing. I get the best fuel economy in stop and go traffic compared to highway cruising.

I'm very impressed with what you've done, and just wish it was "perfect" considering your efforts.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 07-26-2019 at 03:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (07-26-2019)
Old 07-29-2019, 02:20 AM   #376 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Wow 65mpg with that engine is amazing. Good aero is nice.

I'm thinking about getting an S2000 as a toy car if some more money lands in my pocket. That thing probably has 2x the drag of your Insight and enough rear lift to lift the rear wheels of your Insight off the ground T_T

Last edited by serialk11r; 07-29-2019 at 02:25 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
Ecky (07-29-2019)
Old 08-09-2019, 06:46 AM   #377 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Small update: Haven't been working on my car nearly as much as I want to. I bought a house in February and over the last month or so tore an entire side of it off, down to the studs, to replace insulation, sheathing, windows, wrap and siding. Parts of this are time-sensitive and need to be completed during periods where I have both some time off work and a few clear and dry days.

As for the car, I managed to spoof the ECT to stay right in the middle (haven't yet figured out how to properly make it move), took it in for Vermont's very strict state inspection, and had it pass.

I also have been tweaking my fuel maps further on my drive to and from work. I was having an issue where in the mornings it was biased rich, and in the evenings it was biased lean. What I eventually came up with was that intake air temperature was different, and differences in both temperature of the engine and air were able to swing the fuel tables as much as 5-7% in either direction. So, I'm playing with different curves and re-tuning the fuel tables. I don't think the difference observed in the fuel maps is as large as the raw difference in air density, and the difference at low load is different than at high load, plus I have to sort out how much enrichment needs to happen from having cold intake runners and cylinder walls. At those cam openings with a lot of hot EGR happening, the cold coolant enrichment needed is much less. Turns out there's a lot of fine tuning for internal combustion engines, go figure.

Last edited by Ecky; 08-09-2019 at 08:07 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (08-09-2019), MetroMPG (08-14-2019), redpoint5 (08-12-2019)
Old 08-09-2019, 07:11 PM   #378 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Impressive practice, nonetheless. Those fuel tables sound complex. The more sensor inputs, the more complexity, I am sure.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 08:17 AM   #379 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Got some instrumentation! For the initial tune I divided my injector size by that of one of the Civics referenced in the MPGuino Wiki, and at a glance the fuel economy numbers look to be within a few percent of what I'd expect them to be.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20190811_142905.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	55.7 KB
ID:	26661  
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (08-14-2019), MetroMPG (08-14-2019), mpg_numbers_guy (08-12-2019)
Old 08-12-2019, 10:11 PM   #380 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,363

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 64.01 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 321
Thanked 480 Times in 365 Posts
Nice!

I'm guessing MG = Miles per Gallon and GH = Gallons per Hour, but what do the S and C stand for?

__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)


2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com