Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2012, 09:44 PM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington state
Posts: 29
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Yeah, I knew the alternator doesn't shut off completely, just is more passive or set at a lower voltage goal. that quote was from 'gearbox' of civicforums.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-15-2012, 09:59 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 337
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts
It has been shown to increase mpg by 10% to eliminate the alternator. I would say that running it all the time by eliminating the eld would probably use a little more fuel then it already does in normal mode, but probably not much.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2012, 10:36 PM   #33 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
I can only simply offer my experience running without the alt since last September. The mod in this thread shuts the alt off completely if after flipping the off switch you cut the engine and bump start. Or if you never turn the alt on in the first place. The biggest gains are on the freeway, or any other driving over 40 mph, which is a condition when the ELD normally has the alt charging at 14.3 volts or so (full on). This means I can use the freeways more, get places quicker and still top 60mpg and more. That's my experience.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
turbothrush (04-16-2012)
Old 04-17-2012, 12:16 AM   #34 (permalink)
mikehallbackhoe
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weaverville, california
Posts: 126

honda crx - '84 honda crx 1300
90 day: 55.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
has anybody figured out how much this will cost ? how much battery capacity do you need, and how far can you drive at night? what brand deep cycle battery will you use? how long will they last?
what kind of charger? these are a lot of questions, but till they are answered, you really don't know how long it will take to pay for this mod. You also have to remember to charge it, and then unplug the charger. seems like a lot of work and cash for very little gain. Being able to turn your alternator on when you need it is nice, but will negate any fuel savings.
what about just replacing your alternator pulley with a 5 percent larger pulley. would this take some load off the alternator, without the extra expense and hassle of disconnecting your alternator?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 12:58 AM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 337
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikehallbackhoe View Post
but till they are answered, you really don't know how long it will take to pay for this mod.
From a strictly financial standpoint one needs to compare their current mpg with the guesstimate of 10% improvement. in 10,000 miles from 50old to 55new mpg you would save $73 dollars at $4 per gallon gas used.

in 10,000 miles from 30mpg to 33mpg you would save $120.

These figures are without the cost of charging deducted from the annual savings as that is a continual annual cost, and not an up front cost of say the batteries, charger, wire, switches, ect.

SO MANY VARIABLES..............
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 01:59 AM   #36 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikehallbackhoe View Post
has anybody figured out how much this will cost ? how much battery capacity do you need, and how far can you drive at night? what brand deep cycle battery will you use? how long will they last?
what kind of charger?
I use an Odyssey PC1200 deep-cycle battery and the 6amp Odyssey charger (total cost was near $280). The set up might last 5 years or more, with care. The cost of the switch and wire was negligible. I figure it will take about a year and a half "to pay for itself".

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikehallbackhoe View Post
these are a lot of questions, but till they are answered, you really don't know how long it will take to pay for this mod.
That's fair. I think of it maybe a little differently than a lot of people on this site (but not all, I'm sure). I don't modify my car and hypermile it primarily for direct and immediate cash savings, though I have managed to come out ahead so far. I get satisfaction from boosting this 1998 car of mine to 60+ mpg and I get a sense of autonomy from not being beholden to the automakers' pricing of new high-MPG vehicles. You are comparing the cost of the mod to direct savings from the FE improvement, but I'm partly thinking about my savings as coming from the avoidance of car payments.

By my figuring, I'm slightly ahead in cost/benefits of ecomodding (mostly through hypermiling the car) and thousands ahead in avoided car payments this year.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
AbramWagner (08-13-2015)
Old 04-17-2012, 10:01 AM   #37 (permalink)
mikehallbackhoe
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weaverville, california
Posts: 126

honda crx - '84 honda crx 1300
90 day: 55.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I'm with you when it comes to buying a new car. I drive a 1984 crx. but I still can't help but wonder if you would be better off just running a slightly bigger alternator pulley. I am all for higher mpg, but only if it puts more money in my pocket.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2012, 10:34 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 337
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
not being beholden to the automakers' pricing of new high-MPG vehicles. You are comparing the cost of the mod to direct savings from the FE improvement, but I'm partly thinking about my savings as coming from the avoidance of car payments.

By my figuring, I'm slightly ahead in cost/benefits of ecomodding (mostly through hypermiling the car) and thousands ahead in avoided car payments this year.
Not letting "the man" hold you down calicivic?

This is a very good point about just taking an old car and modding it to get better mileage than you can get from a new car. You're saving a bunch by not buying a new car.

I've often thought about buying a 2nd gen prius and putting in one of those booster packs. Sure it'll cost like $4000 or somehting for the booster, but when compared to buying a totally new vehicle, i'm way ahead and can still get better mileage than any new "stock" car.

I've always been 10-20 years behind on owning a new car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012, 01:57 AM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My questions is in a somewhat modern 88 or 92 or even a 96-00 civic are you even able to get the amps to 10 or less? Cause I've used a VAT on a lots cars to make sure there charging and I don't think I've seen a car with that low of amps at idle even with every possible accessory off.


Has anyone driven with a voltmeter hooked to the battery with no accesories at all on and seen the volts go from 14 to 12 in the driving conditions listed?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2012, 08:20 AM   #40 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 16

Landy - '98 Land Rover Defender TDi
90 day: 35.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post

.................I believe the answer might be yes, because the alt will be generating power with nowhere to go. But why would you want this? The power generation itself would still be a parasitic draw on your engine.

I hope those answers help.
I thought about a system where I would have a cut-off switch for the alternator, (with a Volt meter to monitor battery power levels)

Then install a floor mounted push-button, on the floor about a foot behind the clutch pedal. If you go down a steep hill, or approach a stop, and use the engine compression to slow down the vehicle in stead of the brakes, you step on the switch, re-engaging the alternator. The alternator will then generate power from the "braking action" and not consume fuel.
You cannot step on it while the clutch is pressed.
--Obviously only applicable to manual transmission vehicles--

(accessories sold separately, batteries not included)

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com