Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Would you use a flammable refrigerant?
I'd consider it 18 81.82%
No way! 4 18.18%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-21-2019, 10:09 AM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
The above video talks about using CO2.

How efficent is it?

I suspect not very. Otherwise, everyone would use it.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-21-2019, 12:29 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
I think the chance of a front end collision causing refrigerant to catch fire is pretty minimal. I am sure that most people that frequent this forum are much more safe than the average driver. And for those that own a Jeep or a truck, there are nice steel aftermarket bumpers that are available that will really minimize any front end damage in a collision.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 12:25 AM   #53 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: elizabethtown, KY USA
Posts: 14
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to jeff5may
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
The above video talks about using CO2.

How efficent is it?

I suspect not very. Otherwise, everyone would use it.
CO2 isn't a bad refrigerant gas, but the problem is that it has a whole lot more pressure inside the system. Where a typical auto AC system might reach 300 or so PSI, a carbon dioxide system operates above 1000 psi. It can't be done with an existing system as a retrofit, new components must be installed that can hold up to the very high pressure.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeff5may For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (04-23-2019)
Old 04-24-2019, 11:10 AM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
Is the R134a replacement stuff still working good?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Taylor95 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (04-24-2019)
Old 04-24-2019, 12:27 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95 View Post
Is the R134a replacement stuff still working good?
Yes it is. I don't think this car's AC system has ever worked this well! I haven't needed to use the AC very much this year, but it still works great. When I have time, I might try to optimize the charge amount by adding a little refrigerant at a time until performance decreases then removing a little though.

Also, since this refrigerant is a blend, it must be slowly added as a liquid (can upside down) so it doesn't fractionate. Similarly, refrigerant also needs to be removed as a liquid if the system is overcharged. So if you overcharge and you need to remove refrigerant, you would release the refrigerant from the high pressure port with the AC running.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2019, 08:27 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
I have. I read about an incident where there was a front end collision with a newer Mercedes, a refrigerant like ruptured, refrigerant and oil sprayed on the exhaust, and the car burned to the ground. I wish I could find that link. However, I did find this video where a car actually burns down due to flammable refrigerant:
I'd like to point out that this flammable gas (1234yf) is used in approximately 50% of new cars on the road today.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/which...-eric-sugarman

If refrigerant fires were a big concern I think we'd be hearing more of it.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2019, 05:56 PM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
So what tools do you actually use to put this different refrigerant in?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2019, 09:09 PM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
You need the proper equipment to recover the old (highly toxic) gas and oil, and then the proper pressure gauge set up to work out the correct charge (since it will be different to OEM specs).

The outlay will exceed getting it done professionally.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2019, 09:01 PM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513

2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US)

2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
90 day: 17.08 mpg (US)

2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT
Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US)

2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US)

2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe
90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
I don't think it is that much of a risk either, but I am not going to say that everyone should start using it and that there is no risk at all either because that's not the case at all. According to the article above, a guy apparently almost lost his car because of a fire due to the use of this refrigerant.
you know they have under the hood fire suppression system that are fairly cheap
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2019, 12:56 PM   #60 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Doesn't the constant cycling on/off cause accelerated wear on the compressor and its clutch?

__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com