06-06-2017, 04:47 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
David in Australia with Renault Scenic
Hello guys,
I have a Renault Scenic which is not so economical. More of a track car really and a Celica GT-Four.
The Scenic was meant to be an around town 'slow' car. Then the engine blew and I upgraded it to a RenaultSport engine and it now goes as well as a lot of Turbo cars.
That's ridiculous but true.
Last week I got back from Japan and they are into Toyota Prius. omg, such bodykits and extra things they add to them there.
I guess that made me remember about this site.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 05:55 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
|
Is that a 1st generation or 2nd generation Scenic? And what was its stock engine?
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 07:57 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
Is that a 1st generation or 2nd generation Scenic? And what was its stock engine?
|
Technically, it's a facelifted Gen-I. It is auto and came with a stock 2.0L 100Kw engine. Long gone now.
The new and current engine is a RenaultSport Clio-172 130Kw engine, pretty much stock It's plenty powerful. Definitely the opposite of eco-modding at the moment.
I've got eco-modding plans for it, but we'll see how it goes.
In the past I Water-Injected my L300 Mitsubishi van and got substantial (~33%) fuel economy improvements. But that was carby not efi.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 09:03 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
I got to five posts so now I can share a picture:
My Scenic is the big car at the front. The ones behind had trouble keeping up - lol.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 09:15 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Welcome to the site.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-06-2017, 05:16 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ar5boosted
Technically, it's a facelifted Gen-I. It is auto and came with a stock 2.0L 100Kw engine.
|
Was it available only with the 2.0L engine in Australia? Here in Brazil there were 3 engine options, the early 8-valve 2.0L, then a 16-valve 1.6L and a 16-valve 2.0L, and 1.9L turbodiesel versions for export to Argentina and Uruguay. IIRC only the 2.0L 8-valve and the turbodiesel had never been available with automatic transmission.
Quote:
In the past I Water-Injected my L300 Mitsubishi van and got substantial (~33%) fuel economy improvements. But that was carby not efi.
|
How did you get that fuel economy improvement in the L300? Adjusting the carburettor to run leaner or keeping lower RPM in a taller gear?
|
|
|
06-06-2017, 07:27 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
Was it available only with the 2.0L engine in Australia? Here in Brazil there were 3 engine options, the early 8-valve 2.0L, then a 16-valve 1.6L and a 16-valve 2.0L, and 1.9L turbodiesel versions for export to Argentina and Uruguay. IIRC only the 2.0L 8-valve and the turbodiesel had never been available with automatic transmission.
|
I don't know about the 8-valve engines but the 1.6 and 2.0 16V were both available here and I actually had both. The 1.6 was a K4VM and the 2.0 was the F4R that was mated with the Auto. Having had both I actually prefer the 1.6 K4M but they are cheap crappy engines and the mechanics hate them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
How did you get that fuel economy improvement in the L300? Adjusting the carburettor to run leaner or keeping lower RPM in a taller gear?
|
https://plus.google.com/+DavidLyon/posts/MW1qzbFfsDU
I had an electric water pump and a switch. I'd pump water into the carby with a spray module. It was calibrated to work best at 1100 rpm which was low speed driving.
https://plus.google.com/+DavidLyon/posts/jFrdmiMZexL
Due to the increased torque I could drive in the next higher gear.
I found that I could run 50% water by volume and that would give 30% fuel saving going from 14L/100km down to 9L/100km. It also got a lot more power so the life of the vehicle was extended by an extra 10 years over what it was designed for.
A closeup on the next car:
https://plus.google.com/+DavidLyon/posts/3DKGmaFEPvN
It was great to own and drive. I didn't have a good enough system for it to be saleable but it suited what I needed it for.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
Last edited by ar5boosted; 06-06-2017 at 07:38 PM..
|
|
|
06-08-2017, 09:53 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 13,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,720 Times in 1,534 Posts
|
I haven't seen so many complaints against the K-series engines in general. But anyway, by now it's been mostly replaced by that Nissan QG engine.
|
|
|
06-08-2017, 02:17 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,541
Thanks: 4,085
Thanked 6,989 Times in 3,619 Posts
|
Belated welcome!
Quote:
I Water-Injected my L300 Mitsubishi van and got substantial (~33%) fuel economy improvements. But that was carby not efi.
|
Would EFI not adapt to this approach as well? There are a couple of manufacturers doing H2o injection these days, but as a means of avoiding detonation in high output engines, not for efficiency. (I'm sure I've read about a BMW with it.)
Quote:
future - probably a Prius
|
Have you driven one yet? I ask only because the driving experience is SO different from the cars you've mentioned.
|
|
|
06-08-2017, 10:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Belated welcome!
Would EFI not adapt to this approach as well? There are a couple of manufacturers doing H2o injection these days, but as a means of avoiding detonation in high output engines, not for efficiency. (I'm sure I've read about a BMW with it.)
|
I put it on a Suzuki but then I had some tuning issues - best described as a fail on my part. I never was able to duplicate the economy improvements on the EFI engine due to lowered engine temperatures. I injected too much cold water and blew the Head-Gasket. My enthusiasm declined after that although I do have reflections on how I could have done better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Have you driven one yet? I ask only because the driving experience is SO different from the cars you've mentioned.
|
No, but I get where you're going with that -
but the bodykits that are available for them in Japan make them look so fast.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
|
|
|
|