Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2010, 04:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
MAX torque at 800rpm?!?!

I was just told that the 300 I-6 develops MAX torque at 1200 rpm, with 10° timing. I have mine set to 14°, so that would make it roughly 800 rpm, right? No wonder it pulls so hard at idle! I can climb real hills at 35mph in 5th gear!!! If I try to go faster on a steep hill, it just slows to 35! A change of timing might be in order.....

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-13-2010, 04:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacCarlson View Post
I was just told that the 300 I-6 develops MAX torque at 1200 rpm, with 10° timing. I have mine set to 14°, so that would make it roughly 800 rpm, right? No wonder it pulls so hard at idle! I can climb real hills at 35mph in 5th gear!!! If I try to go faster on a steep hill, it just slows to 35! A change of timing might be in order.....
Thats sounds pretty low for gas engine .
I did Google search and came up with this, see if it fits your yrs .

Ford 300 Inline 6 Cylinder Specs, Ford 300 Engine Information, Firing Order : Engine Facts.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 04:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
How do you figure?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 05:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I was told that each degree of advance moves the torque curve down ~100 rpm. Is this not right?

I was poking around on other forums and found the 1200 rpm statement for my engine. I have no idea which forum it was. I know it is nowhere near 2000 rpm.
I run out of torque fairly quickly compared to what I used to have before the timing change.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 05:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Cam timing or ignition timing?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 06:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I was told ignition timing....I assume that is wrong by the way you asked....
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2010, 06:31 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Those general rules of thumb tend to apply to things near the "average" of whatever group the rule of thumb is supposed to apply to. Yours sounds like it probably isn't near the average.

You may not have moved the torque band down at all, in fact. Only a dyno will tell you for certain. The same goes for cam timing, BTW.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to some_other_dave For This Useful Post:
IsaacCarlson (10-13-2010)
Old 10-13-2010, 11:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 80

turquoise - '97 Toyota Starlet
90 day: 41.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Cam timing will affect your toque band.

Ignition timing will do little if nothing.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 11:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
More ignition timing (up to the ideal point) generally equals more power at a given RPM, similar to more compression. Basically, it increases cylinder pressure when the plug fires. This can lead to a gain in low-end torque, but it shouldn't cause a loss of high rpm torque.

Advanced cam timing, however, moves the entire powerband down.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2010, 02:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I set the timing back to 10° today and test drove....I lost a lot of my low-end torque. I used to be able to smoke the tires on the driveway in third from idle....not with 10° timing. It starts quicker, and seems to drive "easier". The computer advanced the timing a LOT more with the base set at 14° than at 10°. The comp advances the timing to ~26° with 14° timing and only 15° with 10°....anybody know why? Shouldn't it be linear? Maybe leave the spout connector plugged in and see what it does when I change it?

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Master list of 65+ proven mods for increasing MPG MetroMPG EcoModding Central 220 10-24-2019 02:44 AM
Tires with different max PSI Goldenfrog EcoModding Central 2 06-14-2008 04:42 PM
Series Motor - Speed vs Torque TomEV Fossil Fuel Free 3 03-02-2008 01:27 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com