09-06-2018, 12:00 PM
|
#161 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,078
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,562 Times in 1,587 Posts
|
That's about the only thing I miss in my Insight - the lack of lack of roof.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-06-2018, 01:49 PM
|
#162 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
boat tail!
Jumped the shark?
I got the idea from this pic I found:
But that's a much smaller boat.
Also, he should have put that on upside down.
Memories of...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-06-2018, 05:25 PM
|
#163 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Ha! That's a funny ad - there were no Swift convertbles!
|
Maybe not in Canuck territory, but we sure did get them over here in Europe
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2018, 03:57 PM
|
#164 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
First fill since last October...
49.98 MPG US = 4.7 L/100 km
SO CLOSE. I HAZ SADS.
Needs more mods!
Also: it's surprisingly hard to get > 40 mpg in short local trips with a cold engine, even with lots of engine-off at appropriate times. This thing really sucks back the fuel when it's cold.
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 05:51 AM
|
#165 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
trick it in to thinking the engine is warmer, sooner?
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 06:02 AM
|
#166 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
You can run the coolant fluid low, and use cardboard to keep the engine hotter than factory.
From the factory, all cars are calibrated to work best at 75F.
Anything higher, or lower, is somewhat calibrated by the fuel, but still runs slightly worse than at 75F.
It's always good to do minor mods to achieve that goal when possible.
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 09:47 AM
|
#167 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
|
Why on earth would you run en engine low on coolant?
__________________
My current Ecotec project...
My last Ecotec project...
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 12:05 PM
|
#168 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
I assume 75f is ambient temp, not engine temp.
And yes, I wouldn't recommend running an engine low on coolant. If you want a similar effect, the higher the antifreeze content, the less heat it can absorb. So in theory, if you ran higher % of traditional antifreeze, the engine should warm up faster. You should still run some water in it, especially if it's going to be below freezing outside, so that it can absorb enough heat, and not freeze. Pure antifreeze freezes not much lower than pure water.
|
|
|
09-09-2018, 01:59 PM
|
#169 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 19bonestock88
Why on earth would you run en engine low on coolant?
|
To warm up the engine faster. Less coolant, quicker warmup.
You'll be ok with a low coolant level. Low coolant levels are well above the absolute minimum your engine needs to survive.
And yes 75F is ambient. Engines run over 200F.
|
|
|
09-12-2018, 10:07 PM
|
#170 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
kayak trip
The air did not really like this setup.
With the boat properly strapped down, I struggled to get ~45 MPG (US) / 5.2 L/100 km on a 150 km round trip at speeds where I'd easily be getting 50+
Partly I think it was because the boat was positioned in line with the passenger side of the car (for outward visibility). Might have worked better dead center.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|