Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2014, 06:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
My experience with lightweight wheels

Hi everyone, I replaced the stock wheels on my Civic with some lightweight ones. The specs are:
- Stock: 15"x6" +45, 7.8 Kg
- Light: 15"x7", +40, 5 Kg

I kept the same exact tires.

The difference in feel is quite large. The car seems to accelerate and brake much more easily. Road feel, steering response and ride quality have improved as well.

Coasting distances seem to have decreased, which is to be expected.

Slightly more surprising to me is that on uphills the car seems to lose speed very easily. This makes me sad.

I am wondering if I should keep them on or not.

Regarding fuel economy, I haven't used a full tank of gas yet and the temperatures are fluctuating so it'll be hard to judge unless I keep them until the Summer.

__________________

Last edited by RPM; 11-29-2014 at 07:00 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RPM For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (01-16-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-29-2014, 07:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Each wheel-tire assembly is in essence a flywheel. It takes energy to spin up all 4 wheels including all rotating mass (brake rotors-drums). It will improve you mileage but with colder temps, as you posted, the benefit will be offset by loses due to temperature.

Greater rotating mass requires more power to get to the same speed but coasting will suffer slightly. Overall you should see an increase in mileage. I would keep the lighter wheels due to the better road feel, steering response and ride quality. Ride quality especially with higher inflation pressures.

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
oldtamiyaphile (11-29-2014)
Old 11-29-2014, 09:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
I reduced 10 lbs a wheel on my car. Love it as I spend a lot of time in traffic that slows and speeds up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2014, 11:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
I had lightweight rims on my Fit and saw improved gas mileage when using them, as well as the advantages in responsiveness and handling you mention. But it was not as pure a test as yours because the tires were not the same. I definitely remember hating to take them off in the winter.

Reducing unsprung mass improves handling and responsiveness. Reducing rotating mass improves acceleration and should improve fuel economy, but how much might depend on what kind of driving you do as much as anything else.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2014, 03:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Thank you for the replies. I think I'll try to keep them at least until the Summer so I can properly assess their effect on fuel economy. The car is definitely more fun to drive with them, except climbing on the highway.

Did any of you experience any difficulty maintaining speed while going uphill with the lighter wheels?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2014, 08:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
I have a cvt so the car selects the best ratio. Since it has more spunk I drive a bit more aggressive. Before it was a pain to keep up with traffic, now its easy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2014, 11:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Beating EPA Unmodded
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 143

Blue Eagle - '10 Honda Civic LX
Team Honda
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
That CVT would be great, since you don't have to actually change gear ratios to get better mileage, nor does tire size really relate to RPM at cruising speeds (acceleration is a different story).

I can't speak for my car when it comes to different wheel weights, but driving other cars with obviously heavier wheels, they can take hills easily. With my small wheels, I drop 2-5-sometimes 10 MPH trying to go uphill, but with my Dad's V6 Accord, I can climb up hills with no problem. This is not because it has a bigger engine (I don't think since it should've been on 3 cylinder mode), but because it weighs more. It makes sense that a heavier car should maintain speed uphill because of how inertia works, but at some point on a really long hill, the heavier vehicle will slow down much faster than a lighter car because gravity will catch up to it.

All-In-All I wouldn't worry too much about losing speed uphill. Once you get more used to the wheels, hills won't be as much of a problem. My solution would be to speed up a lot before the hill then coast or DWL up the hill.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2015, 03:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Today it rained cats and dogs. The first serious rainy day I've had since installing the lighter wheels. The car coasted so poorly it wasn't even funny. Less momentum plus the need to displace more water make these lightweight and wide wheels no fun in these conditions.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2015, 04:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
If you have the same tires it should not have that much difference to rain or snow behaviour. Only difference is the gyro effect which does not allow change of direction so easily with heavy wheels?

But in my experience poor behaviour in rain or snow is due to thread depth or grip problem
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
Cobb (01-15-2015)
Old 01-15-2015, 05:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
I was surprised as well. It's like driving a different car with just the wheel change. Then again I think I'm more sensitive to small changes than most people.

Some of the changes were good (performance, handling, ride comfort), some bad (poor coasting).

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com