Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2012, 03:29 PM   #71 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 323

Civic CX/HX - '97 Honda Civic CX/HX
Team Honda
90 day: 63.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 50 Times in 36 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by electronFarmer View Post
That is precisely why I chose the simplest solution... manual steering box.
I agree. I have tired it both ways and it is much better with manual steering rack!

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-05-2012, 11:22 PM   #72 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 717

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 59 Times in 45 Posts
We removed the power steering on our car and F-250.

The car was very hard to steer with the belt off because you still have to push the fluid through the vector and pump. I drained most of the fluid and looped the lines at the rack. For the pump, I removed the vanes and put it back together with some oil in it so it would not burn up the bushings. The car used a serp belt so I could not leave it off. It worked great and my wife loved driving it. The steering effort was almost zero and you could feel what the tires were doing.

The truck was a little different. I rerouted the belt and cut the lines to loop them at the steering box. It was ok, but 3,000 lbs on the steer tires was killer on the arms with the original steering box. I picked up a manual box from the parts store and WOW! My wife can drive that too.

Neither one of us likes power steering anymore because you can't feel what the tires are doing. Manual steering lets you feel when they start to slip and gives you more feel for the road.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 06:20 AM   #73 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,041

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
In my car, I took off the belt and put a smaller one on. The steering is a bit harder but only 15-20% at low speeds. I like the road feel, and the additional power.

I tried doing some ABA testing but could not get the belts on and off with the engine hot
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 03:39 AM   #74 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennyt View Post
Running power steering off the driveshaft means you have 0 assist in parking lots, which is the whole point of power steering in a daily driver.
Not really, considering that you're MOVING through the parking lot... proper pulley size would have had a bunch to do with it. The real problem would have been over-running the pump and destroying it at highway speeds.
__________________
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 03:43 AM   #75 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I plan on removing the PS and (unused) A/C pumps on my '92 Camaro (3.1) soonish. Well, whenever I decide it's time to do more wrenching on it. Probably the same day I pull the the front end off to change the 3 blown/non working headlights.

That'll the be same day I trim the exhaust down and make a side-exit pipe in front of the "too-wide-rear-tires-that-cost-me-more-than-the-stupid-car-did".

Of course, eventually I plan on using a Mustang II rack and pinion setup to save some front weight, too, because I'm also putting a 3800SC under the hood. Gotta compensate for the extra weight there.

Oddly, the cars with the 3800SC got better MPG (and obviously much, much more power) than the 3100 cars did. Hm.
__________________
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:46 AM   #76 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,648

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 386 Times in 278 Posts
i may have to do the PS delete, if i make a hard input to the wheel at low engine speed the pump screams like banshee, and its not the belt slipping. already have the ac out so after the ps would be the alternator.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 11:21 PM   #77 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 9,570

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 3,124 Times in 2,444 Posts
I finely got around to measuring how much power it takes to turn a P/S pump.
It looks like if you can keep the P/S turning at 850rpms it takes hardly any power to turn, around 150 to 200 watts.
But when you bring it up to a more normal cruse speed say about 2,000 rpms power draw goes up quite a bit. It took a little over 500 watts to keep it turning at that speed.
For my suburban 500w gets about half MPG.
I'm going with a clutched setup.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 11:45 AM   #78 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I just read about everything I planned on doing with the Camaro... and laughed at myself.

I traded that car for a '95 S10 that needed a bunch of work because I'd rather have a utility vehicle than a sports car. Man, I'm a redneck.
__________________
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 12:40 PM   #79 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 54

daewoo - '99 Daewoo Lanos SX
90 day: 39.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
For those asking about shorter belts.
Both v-belts and micro-v (serpentine) belts are made to a set of standard cross-sections in Vs they are like A, B, C, D or measured in inches across the outer face of the belt.

V beltsNotes on Pulleys and Belts

microJ Section Micro Rib Belts

I am not endorsing this second one they just have a nice diagram.

I used to work for a big name belt maker and we made every profile in lengths from around 8" circumference up to 144" in half inch increments.

The auto parts store should have a set of notched templates that fit into the pulleys and another for measuring the belts.

I have one around here somewhere and will upload a pic if I find it.
__________________
Just trying to save a little more money!


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2013, 07:31 AM   #80 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 19

Felicia - '99 Skoda Felicia LXi, MPI Hatchback
90 day: 38.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have also started to think about this mod.
I discussed it shortly in this thread:
Ops, can't post urls.
Google for briskoda + "getting rid of power steering"

However... I'm scared that the rack will not take the pressure and increased wear that manually steering with a power steering rack would require.
Since the PAS-rack is designed to have assist, perhaps it can't handle manual handeling?

Is this fear unwarranted?
Please tell me that it won't break if I do this mod!

Here we can see the different equipment manual/powersteering
Google: "Classic Technical Guides" + "Felicia power steering retro-fit thread"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"underdrive" power steering pump? gascort EcoModding Central 11 03-04-2017 07:44 AM
Converting power steering to electric power steering Daox EcoModding Central 54 01-17-2017 06:16 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
Removed '00 Civic power steering belt and got good results but... hondaworkshop EcoModding Central 8 10-07-2008 01:23 PM
The New York Times: Economy Champs Get the Cold Shoulder akcapeco EcoModding Central 4 06-14-2008 12:42 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com