Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2010, 11:25 AM   #391 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
not so sure about that. with a 15% improvement I don't see a small flutter in Throttle Position having a 15% impact.

ie if we were talking about 2 or 3 % sure any small variation TP and Wind would have a statistically relevant impact.

but at 15% we are talking BIG change here not little change.

I don't even think a 10mph change in wind would have more than a few % impact on the results.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-04-2010, 01:23 PM   #392 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 827

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 558 Times in 191 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerys View Post
...ie if we were talking about 2 or 3 % sure any small variation TP and Wind would have a statistically relevant impact...
Hi Nerys,

For what it's worth...

On the Insight, the TPS is not as sensitive as the MPH indicator.

I have not kept a real close eye on this, but have noticed in warmer weather, and with the TPS at 17, the mph can vary I'd guess about 3 mph.

That is to say, watching the MPH indicator gives a better hold on speed than watching the TPS reading on the ScanGauge.

My tach is not nearly as sensitive as the MPH reading.

______________________________________________

I suppose one could put an externally mounted variable pot on the throttle body shaft and make that work in conjunction with an ohm meter reading...

Jim.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:29 AM   #393 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your car just showed up on the AOL scrolling news reel. Good job, maybe more people will start moding.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 11:22 AM   #394 (permalink)
Gary Paudler
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Summerland, California
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PVC is evil stuff, but the scrim-reinforced vinyl that is used for truck tarps is very durable and available in black and can be shiny. It is easy enough to sew or can be RF or hot air welded. There is clear vinyl that could be welded or sewn-in as a rear window. It could be supported by an inflatable cone sticking out horizontally from the back of your car with no rigid elements making it easy to stow for low-speed city driving. You could use the exhaust pipe as a compressor for inflation. Urethane-coated nylon or polyester would be a good alternative fabric.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 12:18 PM   #395 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,410

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.07 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 66.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,939
Thanked 6,819 Times in 3,539 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
Metro - have you considered watching rpm instead of mph? There's a lot more resolution available there. 4 digits for rpm instead of 2 for mph.
Tach is a good idea, but I was monitoring the analog (original equipment) speedometer during the runs. An analog gauge gives better feedback than a numeric display - it's easier to see trending with a needle on a dial face.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 12:41 PM   #396 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,474
Thanks: 195
Thanked 258 Times in 195 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gary paudler View Post
You could use the exhaust pipe as a compressor for inflation.
Careful about that: Exhaust is hot, and it contains a pretty good amount of water. Neither one of which is desirable for inflating something made of plastic.

Anecdote: I have heard stories of someone in my car club who used the exhaust from his car to inflate a balloon (used to hold a sign aloft). It started out OK, but after a while the water in the exhaust started condensing out and overloaded the balloon. I don't remember if the water went back down the exhaust pipe and plugged up the motor, or if it just leaked out of the balloon, but either way it didn't work so well.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 02:27 PM   #397 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
The heat might not be such an issue... most cars, I can hold my hand in front of the exhaust pipe for as long as you want to run it and it just doesn't get that hot.

Older cars, on the other hand, with carbs and no cat... those things got warm.
__________________
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 03:25 PM   #398 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 22,513
Thanked 6,708 Times in 4,248 Posts
downforce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
So why is it that the angle of the underside of that 'tail is greater than the top ?

( The 'tail on the EV-1 that is. )
Don Schroeder,who tested my CRX at Chrysler was killed on this track when he lost control of a RennTech V-12 Mercedes.
When A.J.Foyt was going for the record in the long-tail Olds Aerotech he claimed that is was very difficult to keep the car in its lane,And that was with tunnel-ram ground-effects downforce underbelly.
I went to Ft. Stockton in 1997 and they said it was very windy there and it really impacts the number of days when people can test.
It's only my opinion, that the tail cone on the EV-1 allowed the low base pressure of the wake to underride the tail and use it as a moment arm to improve traction over the rear axle.
The "six-pack" of extra batteries on the floor of the passenger side would have added downforce at the front.
Just a guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 03:37 PM   #399 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 22,513
Thanked 6,708 Times in 4,248 Posts
safe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I think it's safe to say some of these angles we take for granted can be cheated somewhat (made steeper) if other elements are in place. As evidence I offer the way the upper rear of the EV1 sits under the aero template. With the good Cd it has, I'd think the flow back there is good.
Frank,I agree. 22-degrees seems to be the magic limit if the C-pillars can feed some air towards the backlight.Chrysler was able to pull this off with the Daytona 500.
I tried to make the template a little liberal.Both development models for Kamm and Jaray have L/D ratios LESS than 2.5:1 and as you can see in the K-car windtunnel photo,the flow separates over the last foot of the roof as it falls way too steeply.
I do believe the EV-1 has separated flow.Check out Gallery-12 in the FLOW-IMAGES and see what you think.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 03:43 PM   #400 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 22,513
Thanked 6,708 Times in 4,248 Posts
steeper

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Hi,

I think if we consider the 3D flow, then the angles can be steeper than the 2D template. If the air closes in from the sides, it may be filling in where the flow down from the top cannot?
Neil,sorry,I'm trying to catch up.
I agree that angles can be steeper.Frank had just mentioned it and I used the example of Chrysler's Daytona 500 with the C-Pillar buttresses feeding air at the 22-degree backlight.
22-degrees is the angle Mair arrived at to be the absolute max for attached flow we could use,if everything upstream was clean and energetic.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
boat tail, testing

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 11:59 AM
How to get instant fuel consumption from Megasquirt TELVM Instrumentation 11 08-29-2011 02:47 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com