05-19-2010, 01:28 PM
|
#231 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Newport News
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Anything?
This cardboard project is 2 years old but it's on hte site as a permanent mod. Did that ever happen?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-26-2010, 03:05 AM
|
#232 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I'm Just curious but doesnt this also in theory boost the cars speed as well or am I wrong that aerodynamics and reduction of drag can also help with performance? Cause my aspire probably could use that design theory. And I'm wondering do any of you offer a sellable fabrication I could possibly pay you to help design for me? well atleast i mean maybe a mountable fiberglass or carbon-fiber version?
Last edited by drossdarkblood; 05-26-2010 at 03:06 AM..
Reason: left out details
|
|
|
06-15-2010, 02:12 AM
|
#233 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: planet earth
Posts: 6
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi
Came to this via Jalop and have read through all 24 pages.
Here's a few random thoughts on "aero" from the deep recesses of my mind thanks to the 1973 OPEC "oil crisis"
First, A "teardrop" isn't actually the ideal shape for a car unless of course you're planning to drop it off a cliff. To start, gravity distorts a drop of water in ways it doesn't a car's airflow. Next, a teardrop has clear air all around it; a car doesn't. This is why all serious Aero testing is done in an open chamber tunnel with a rolling road. Interestingly, real "road testing" produces far more accurate results than a lot of very expensive tunnel time and it's way cheaper!
Regardless of how slick the bottom of your car is, it isn't as good as the top bit. Any air forced under the car is compressed by the road surface, making it a "heavier" fluid; ie: more drag. This is why Nascars use that wacking great front spoiler. You can pick up lots of MPG here.
The ideal departure angle for the rear deck should not exceed 7 degrees to maintain ideal Laminar flow regardless of all the teardrop talk. If you look at the "smoke" pic of the Insight you can see the smoke at the rear of the deck is seperating somewhat( it's thicker). This indicates that it's generating lift and drag. If you can find a pic of a second gen CRX from Europe, they have a slick little rubber duck tail that flattens out the air flow. You might try something like this on you car and see what comes of it.
Re: the discussion of flat back or open, my work on my old Hornet hatcback in '73 says open. Air coming off the bodywork creates vortex drag that acts on the rear of the car. The extension of the bodywork moves the vortex further from this panel. There's a lot of work to be done here as it's not nearly as simple as it sounds. Different sizes of cars with different aspect ratios produce different results here. I used an array of aluminum rods from an old TV antena( remember those?) mounted to a plywood panel with the fabric tufts to test this out. You may be surprised at the results! Controlling the air rushing under the rear quarters of the car really helps a lot. Rear "diffusers" aren't just about downforce.
gotta go.
hope this gives you a few new ideas to play with!
And your friends think YOU'RE strange; (insert evil laugh)
Last edited by 3304hl; 06-15-2010 at 02:31 AM..
|
|
|
06-15-2010, 10:20 AM
|
#234 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
Hi, 3304hl. Much of what you mentioned is known to the Aerodynamics forum. Yes, actual raindrops grow larger as they fall, turning from round to oblong until they grow to an unsustainable size, turn to a parachute shape, and break apart. But an ideal streamlined body looks a lot like half of a cartoon teardrop.
Here's a thread where I learned a lot about diffuser design: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ion-13230.html
If you're planning on sticking around, you should introduce yourself and your cars: Introductions - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com
|
|
|
06-15-2010, 11:06 AM
|
#235 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glans
This cardboard project is 2 years old but it's on hte site as a permanent mod. Did that ever happen?
|
This kammback is still on the car.
The core of the addition is cardboard, but it was sandwiched in fiberglass - the construction details are in the thread if you want to go back and read up on it.
The finish hasn't been as durable. The paint is flaking off in places now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drossdarkblood
I'm Just curious but doesnt this also in theory boost the cars speed as well
|
It would help higher speed acceleration and top speed, yes.
|
|
|
06-15-2010, 02:11 PM
|
#236 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
...The finish hasn't been as durable. The paint is flaking off in places now.....
|
Hi Metro,
That's strange that the paint is flaking off.
What type of paint did you use? Automotive I hope.
I would think if the cardboard were sealed from the elements properly that a good grade automotive paint would stick.
Of course, if the cardboard surface is not stiff enough and flexes, then that would allow the paint to eventually peel off as well.
Jim.
|
|
|
06-22-2010, 12:00 AM
|
#237 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Hi Jim -
I only used gloss black spray paint over primer, not proper 2-part auto paint. Regardless, it flaked because the cardboard wasn't perfectly sealed/encapsulated.
Water has wicked in, with the result that some areas have suffered from a few freeze thaw cycles, leading to expansion & cracking of the finish.
|
|
|
08-24-2010, 10:20 PM
|
#238 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: green bay WI
Posts: 52
Thanks: 7
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
That 2.0 version looks really nice. You have me thinking of doing one for my first gen Metro.
__________________
94 Geo Metro 52-56 MPG
06 Jetta TDI 46-48 MPG
|
|
|
10-11-2010, 11:24 PM
|
#239 (permalink)
|
slave to the grind
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NKY
Posts: 73
Thanks: 89
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
awesome job! just read the whole thread!
motivated to do some ecomods to my 94 nissan sentra!
__________________
|
|
|
10-13-2010, 01:42 AM
|
#240 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 142
Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
|
Nicely done. I read through this whole thread, and your whole boat tail thread today. I'm now thinking of doing a kamm back on the hardtop of my Miata.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AntiochOG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|