12-31-2009, 10:48 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 87
The Truck - '06 Chevrolet Silverado Ext Cab 4x4 90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 15 Posts
|
Thanks to everyone for all the encouragement! It was fun to build and I think it will serve its purpose well. If I can find some time on a day without wind (we get one or two each year), I'll try to take some video of tufts and see what the air is doing.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:36 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Fubeca, that turned out really well. I'm impressed with the finished look. Wish my handiwork was that polished.
About your test results: what speed were you driving? I didn't see that mentioned.
You likely realize the percentage difference between A & B runs increases with increasing speed.
Brett (bondo) reports a ~20% change with his cap on the highway ( here and here), but with all due respect (and I mean that), he hasn't yet done a "controlled as possible" A-B-A test. Also worth noting: he drives at 70 mph, which would show a greater percentage increase than I would see, for example, because I tend to test around 90 km/h / 56 mph.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:47 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 279
Thanks: 90
Thanked 240 Times in 90 Posts
|
Very nice work!
December 31, 2009 at 3:37 p.m. Fubeca wrote:
"So I don't think the test is really all that valuable. I'll be interested to see how my mileage looks over time."
The A-B-A tests are best in warmer weather with calm wind. Wind tunnel tests are the best do to controlled conditions and refined calibration. Mileage records over time do create a real world average for that specific driver and that specific vehicle.
That said, you did one fine job of fabricating you aerocap. Very nice lines! I wish I had a full scale wind tunnel we could park your truck in with your aerocap on it and do some testing of it's performance toward cd reduction.
Keep up the good work.
Bondo
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:47 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Even if it's a 4% gain at your typical speeds, it's still a significant gain that'll pay for itself in no time.
If you drive 10,000 miles a year at speeds that will net that 4% improvement, that's 19 gallons not burned: 513 gallons vs. 532 gallons. (19.5 mpg vs. 18.8 mpg)
@ $2.75 a gallon, you save $52.25.
So your mod starts giving a healthy return on your investment early in year 2.
And that's a conservative estimate of fuel prices. I'd be willing to bet it's going to be much more than $2.75/gal in the US in 8 or 10 months.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:49 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondo
Mileage records over time do create a real world average for that specific driver and that specific vehicle.
|
This is true of course. And in that case, the more data the more convincing it is.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:49 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 87
The Truck - '06 Chevrolet Silverado Ext Cab 4x4 90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 15 Posts
|
Sorry - I forgot to mention speed. It was at 55mph. I do expect to see better improvements at higher speeds.
I'd love to see what it looks like in a wind tunnel too!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fubeca For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:55 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
This is a pretty awesome looking cap! I can't believe you got it done so quickly.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 02:59 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 87
The Truck - '06 Chevrolet Silverado Ext Cab 4x4 90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 15 Posts
|
Thanks again for all the compliments. I am satisfied with the result for the time that I put into it. I only spent about 12 hours total on the project (I already had all of the materials).
It is a great proof-of-concept for me that will allow testing. If I really like it I may work on doing something more permanent along the lines of Bondo's very nice creations. Who knows, he may be producing them soon and I'll just be able to buy one.
It does look really good in pictures - but it has more than its fair share of imperfections up close. It really was a quick and dirty build.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fubeca For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-02-2010, 10:58 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fubeca
Sorry - I forgot to mention speed. It was at 55mph. I do expect to see better improvements at higher speeds.
|
If you plug your truck's numbers into the aero & rolling resistance tool, you could project what the 4% improvement you saw at 55 would translate into at different speeds.
Quote:
I'd love to see what it looks like in a wind tunnel too!
|
There's always the poor man's wind tunnel! On-road tuft testing, eg. http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...per-11522.html
Thanks again for sharing the project & for the time put into testing (I appreciate the effort it takes).
|
|
|
01-02-2010, 11:09 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 87
The Truck - '06 Chevrolet Silverado Ext Cab 4x4 90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 15 Posts
|
I will probably try tuft testing if I get a reasonable day and some time. Today we had no wind but the high was -4F. I decided not to try any testing
|
|
|
|