Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2011, 12:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
So an actual gauge, even without numbers, isn't useless, if you pay attention.
True, I've done things before like trying different things and seeing when the gauge gets to "that mark"--even if I don't know what "that mark" is it still can be useful for comparing 2 different strategies. Buy my point is why not put the number on? It's not like it saves any money to not put it on. Maybe they just do it so people don't complain, "Hey, the gauge says it's 140 and it's only 120-fix my gauge." I guess if there are no numbers nobody can complain that the gauge isn't accurate.

The "dummy" gauge is what really bugs me. That IS worse than no gauge at all. It's not just witholding information, but potentially giving BAD information. There's a saying in engineering that, "Bad data is worse than no data." Very true.

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-24-2011, 12:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
Many new cars don't have a temperature gauge at all.

It's simply a light that goes blue when it's cold, goes away when it's operating temperature, and flashes red if it gets hot.

I'm not against it, as the average driver will probably pay more attention to a flashing light than a gauge steadily rising.

That said, it doesn't give a lot for us car geeks to go by, but that's what the ScanGauge's are for!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 04:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucey View Post
...that's what the ScanGauge's are for!
...exactly: providing data for the discerning driver!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 06:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
I liked to old heated bimettalic type of gauge. One of my customers once told me the gauges in my Z car were just about identical to those in a F15. Guess they have messed them up in the new models as well.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 08:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
I guess I'm lucky. My Canyon has a real temperature gauge, although without numbers. The needle comes off the peg at 130 deg F, hits the 1/4 mark at 160 deg, and the half mark at 190 deg F.

The gas gauge, however, is an interesting exercise in over-computered tech geek computer programmer time wasting. For instance, it goes to zero after any EOC more than about a mile. It bounces right back after a low fuel warning in the DIC. It goes to zero and stays there after the first long EOC after filling the tank. Etc.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 04:59 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
This has always been a pet peeve of mine.

Having a "gauge" that is nothing more than an idiot light is false advertising and should be illegal. In fact this set up is worse than an idiot light. At least the red light is noticeable.

I think that even with a gauge, there should be a red light which will come on when whatever they are monitoring falls out of normal parameters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 05:49 PM   #17 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...here's an "off-the-wall" analogy:

...the car companies quote interior space volume numbers to two-and-three decimal places, but state fuel tank capacity as 15 gal. [approx]!

...I think gauges should be "regulated" same as speedometers, ie: they ALL must have stated accuracies and precision.

...what do you think?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
capnbass91 (12-02-2011)
Old 12-02-2011, 06:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
I've only ever had one car that when the gauge showed empty it was. Every other one I got more miles out of the first half than the second and could continue driving after they hit empty. It would be nice if they were accurate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 07:42 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
that's been pretty much my experience. seems that most vehicle gas gauges like to sit at full for 100 miles, then drop like a rock. i believe this is done on purpose. people will notice how far they go before the gauge starts to move. if it goes a long distance, it makes them feel they are getting good mileage.

an exception to this is my daughter's saturn wagon. the gauge drops quickly off full, then slows.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 01:49 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
As far as fuel level gauges go, I think the long-distance-on-full phenomenom is largely explainable by the way the fuel gauge is constructed. It's a float, so the fuel level has to drop quite a bit before the float can move (the width of the float). In addition, if you've filled up fuel into the filler neck, there's obviously no way the float can detect that. Additionally, you really don't need to know the fuel level when you're near full do you? I think this is one thing I can live with.

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com