11-23-2011, 11:02 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
The stupidification of gauges
RANT WARNING!
Okay, so what's the deal with gauges on cars these days?
I recently found out that the oil pressure "gauge" on my truck really isn't an oil pressure gauge after all. As it turns out it has a low oil pressure switch but not an oil pressure sensor. So, if there's low oil pressure it will trip the gauge low, but otherwise it just displays an estimated oil pressure (I'm guessing it's estimated from engine speed and coolant temp).
At this point I'm not going to debate whether there should actually be a sensor vs. a switch. But what's the point of even having the gauge?! Why not just have a low oil pressure light? That would be simpler anyway. Adding the gauge adds nothing and just gives the driver potentially bad information.
The other thing that bugs me is the way gauges a) don't have units and/or b) have very few or no numbers. How does not adding numbers and/or units save any money? Are they afraid they'll confuse people? The easily confused aren't looking at their gauges anyway. Most of those stupid gauges just have a red area so people know if things are bad. I'm okay with colors, but why not add numbers and/or units?
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Diesel_Dave For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 11:28 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Its all about image. It looks fancier so they do it. 95% of the owners will never know the difference, so its a win for them.
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 11:56 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
How about temperature gauges? Mine doesn't move until 140F and then reads "normal" anywhere between 160-220F. That's the highest I've seen it, and the gauge still didn't budge. It's a good thing I have the Scangauge to tell me the real story.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2011, 12:06 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
How about temperature gauges? Mine doesn't move until 140F and then reads "normal" anywhere between 160-220F. That's the highest I've seen it, and the gauge still didn't budge. It's a good thing I have the Scangauge to tell me the real story.
|
Yeah, mine doesn't read anything until 140 F either, then only two marks after that, 200 F and I don't remember what the high mark is. Maybe 240 F
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 12:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
The oil gauge is only to 'look' more functional, making the owner think his truck is more hi-tech, or that he has more control over it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
How about temperature gauges? Mine doesn't move until 140F and then reads "normal" anywhere between 160-220F. That's the highest I've seen it, and the gauge still didn't budge. It's a good thing I have the Scangauge to tell me the real story.
|
Same here: my temp gauge starts at 70°C and shows the correct temp (compared to the SGII) up to 90°C, above which it won't budge. Only the SG told me that my fan is broken by displaying a max of 114°C in a traffic jam
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2011, 12:30 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Yeah, I thought the same thing about temp gauges. I wonder what it takes to move them above norm. However, they are sometimes handy to tell if your thermostat is stuck open.
I did notice that the Yaris lacks a coolant temp gauge. It now just has an LED that is blue when cold, green or yellow (I forget) when warm, and red (or something) when its overheating. For the average driver who probably never even pays attention to their temp gauge, this is all they really need.
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 04:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
I did notice that the Yaris lacks a coolant temp gauge. It now just has an LED that is blue when cold, green or yellow (I forget) when warm, and red (or something) when its overheating. For the average driver who probably never even pays attention to their temp gauge, this is all they really need.
|
That's basically what our gauges give us, but the LEDs are a simpler and more compact layout. If it's going to be a dumb gauge, might as well change it to digital instead.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
11-24-2011, 02:43 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Depends on the Day
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
That's basically what our gauges give us, but the LEDs are a simpler and more compact layout. If it's going to be a dumb gauge, might as well change it to digital instead.
|
I totally agree --how far off of "Cold" is it when it disappears? I do miss the sweep of an analog needle...
On the flip-side, I've noticed that many Chrysler-brand vehicles are now offering a digital MID with parameters such as transmission temp, engine hours, and many other readings (not just on RAMs, but also the Grand Caravan and Charger, to name a couple).
RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein
_
_
|
|
|
11-24-2011, 02:43 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
|
Quite few cars now have no temp gauge only a warning light somewhere.
One point which is often overlooked though is an inaccurate gauge is possibly worse then no gauge at all.
Personally I have always regarded gauges as "an estimate" of what ever they are reporting at best given they are built down to a cost.
Interestingly I have found there is , on my car at least , a "service reporting" function which display things like volts , amps , oil press and a few other things on the trip computer.
Accessing this info is via a sequence of button pushing on the normal trip function panel on the display.
Peter.
|
|
|
11-24-2011, 07:55 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
A while back i started thinking that my temp gauge was staying at the bottom a bit too long and then jumping up to the middle a bit too fast. Knowing that the sensor is at the top of the engine i decided to check the coolant level, and lo and behold it was low. I also noticed that the gasket on the cap had turned itself into crap.
So an actual gauge, even without numbers, isn't useless, if you pay attention.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
|