Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2014, 04:07 AM   #11 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Electric SuperChargers Mythbusted - YouTube

__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-26-2014, 04:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Orange, NSW, Australia
Posts: 52
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Phantom Supercharger- a new Performance option? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

this is an electric supercharger, discussion of the electrical details... it is set up for short bursts only, ie on acceleration. The evidence and testing is not as rigorous as some do here but its fairly convincing
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to matt36415 For This Useful Post:
oldtamiyaphile (06-26-2014)
Old 06-26-2014, 07:07 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Awesome, I've always wanted a forced induction set up for my Jeep but didn't want the FE hit of a S/C or the cost (and lack of low end) of a good turbo install.

This looks like it will fit the bill and best of all, if it fails the vehicle just runs as it did in original form.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:45 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,795

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt36415 View Post
Phantom Supercharger- a new Performance option? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

this is an electric supercharger, discussion of the electrical details... it is set up for short bursts only, ie on acceleration. The evidence and testing is not as rigorous as some do here but its fairly convincing

Here's the direct link to the site.

New site - HOME

Could this produce 3-4 psi in a small displacement engine as advertised ?

Possibly.

However.

It would seem to me that when it is not running it would be a restriction in the intake therefore increasing pumping losses.

>
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 09:50 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
If the issue is an intake restriction then I would devise a flap that was closed when the supercharger was operating and otherwise open until the supercharger's pressure closed off the nonboosted pathway. A rocker flap that only required the preessure to exceed ambient pressure to change the charge pathway to through the supercharger.

But I still like the idea of a positive displacement supercharger that would replace the throttle plate, where the restriction was utilized for some electricity generation. It would not be much but you have to consider the duty cycle where the supercharger was actually providing pressure. In my case, I seldom see over 3500 in the Fiesta, even through a whole tank of fuel.

I think the electric supercharger has a future, when combined with an engine like the ecoboost with reduced displacement, so in my case the engine could be less displacement which means higher load for the same vehicle speed and better efficiency under all operational parameters.

It would also mean start-stop would not have to deal with cooking the oil in a normal turbo setup.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 01:14 PM   #16 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
An electric supercharger that delivered sufficient CFM and only worked to boost acceleration (rather than all the time like a traditional supercharger) could give a downsized engine power when needed without the need for a complex turbo retro fit or the MPG hit of a constantly spinning supercharger.
You can get the same on off effect with a clutch on a supercharger.
These compressors have to put out 10 and 20 horsepower worth of air to provide boost. Not something easily done on a 12 volt system.
It can be done, there is an electric super charger out there that does work. Its a screw type compressor with what looks like 3 starter motors powering it. That thing had like a 10% or 20% duty cycle if your electrical could keep up.

I would just go with a clutched setup.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 01:44 PM   #17 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I would just rev a little higher, or forget it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 03:23 PM   #18 (permalink)
Drive less save more
 
ecomodded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189

Dusty - '98 VOLKSWAGEN Beetle TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 60.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt36415 View Post
Phantom Supercharger- a new Performance option? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

this is an electric supercharger, discussion of the electrical details... it is set up for short bursts only, ie on acceleration. The evidence and testing is not as rigorous as some do here but its fairly convincing



It costs $2000 and will sap hp & gas from the engine via the alternator load.

I could buy and install a traditional waste gated Turbo for less money with MUCH larger gains.

For instance with my Waste gated Turbo I can buy a over sized intake manifold from Europe for $250 then add larger fuel injectors $200 plus a $60 chip replaced in the ecu and The car will jump from 90hp to over 220hp.

I think you will find a traditional Turbo is not as expensive as you think , if you buy the parts Online re-manufactured or used / rebuilt & do the work yourself.
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 08:57 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded View Post
I think you will find a traditional Turbo is not as expensive as you think , if you buy the parts Online re-manufactured or used / rebuilt & do the work yourself.
This only holds true if there's an OEM or off the shelf setup to duplicate. For most cars that's not an option.

Quote:
It costs $2000 and will sap hp & gas from the engine via the alternator load.
I don't beleive it will. If you accelerate at BSFC your reducing your acceleration time and you're then recharging the S/C battery 'off peak'.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 09:19 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
If the issue is an intake restriction then I would devise a flap that was closed when the supercharger was operating and otherwise open until the supercharger's pressure closed off the nonboosted pathway. A rocker flap that only required the preessure to exceed ambient pressure to change the charge pathway to through the supercharger.
If the impellor is on a one-way bearing, the restriction would be minimal.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com