01-13-2012, 05:06 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Taller rear tires on RWD vehicle
I've been thinking over this potential mod for a while and wanted to get other's opinions. Would there be an advantage to running taller rear tires on a rear wheel drive vehicle (such as my pickup)?
The advantage of a taller tire is supposed to be lower engine RPM's becuase the powertrain has effectively been re-geared lower. Typically, however, people who go to taller tires (all around) see FE decrease. The thinking hear is that the taller tires hurt the aero because the effective frontal area has increased. Some people also cite the higher rotational mass. Another factor is that many taller tires, tend to generally have higher rolling resistances.
So here's my thinking. If you went to taller tires, but only on the rear of a RWD pickup, you'd get the gearing benefit without the aero penealty, right?
Anybody tried it?
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-13-2012, 07:35 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 104
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.
Last edited by BackroadBomber; 01-13-2012 at 07:43 PM..
|
|
|
01-13-2012, 10:06 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 91
z - '03 nissan 350z touring 90 day: 36.21 mpg (US) Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex 90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
well put!!! I am thinking of going 1" taller, good to hear you got 2 mpg better, I'm sure I will do as good. Thanks for the info!
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 02:46 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northeast Pa
Posts: 62
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
I went from 235/85/16 to 255/85/16 on the rear of my F250. I don't know if my fuel mileage went up or down (I don't think it went down). The only thing I think it will affect is the abs. My Ford only had rear abs (4 wheel abs was an option in 99).
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 07:06 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
It's an expensive way to barely increase one performance parameter while being detrimental to others, IMO. But I would start by searching commercial operators: Hotshot, LTL, etc, for other than anecdotal on 8,000-lb pickup trucks under 24,000-lb trailers one direction, and deadheading others. Kind of like a GV O-D. I don't recall having "seen" a benefit in my reading in those forums on this, and long ago shelved the idea. Maybe something newer has come along. A place to start is a large-area search on a contributor to many forums -- RV & commercial -- JIMNLIN, as he made a living going back 30-years with pickup trucks in service. Also owns a Dodge. A good source of what works well for tires on these trucks.
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 08:13 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
OCD Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
|
I've seen VW beetle people call this a "rubber overdrive". But I suspect they're resizing all four wheels.
The increased rotating mass of the bigger tire will be negative for city stop and go driving - due to you have to accelerate that mass all the time. On the highway the increased rotating mass doesn't hurt you nearly as much.
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 11:18 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wi.
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Everybody did that in high school, usually included air shocks & cragars.
|
|
|
01-14-2012, 12:31 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.
|
exactly!
|
|
|
01-15-2012, 06:20 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackroadBomber
I got slightly. Bigger tires on my ford ranger and I see a decent mpg increase, like 2 mpg. Also, the reason people think they get worse mileage is because people don't re-calibrate theirs speedo and odometer. A bigger tire will make your speedo read slower, so your odometer will show less miles than actual miles driven. If you put bigger tires on, make sure you get your speedo recalibrated, or if your trucks older like mine figure out the percentage it's off and factor that In to figure out your true mileage. Oh by the way the tires that are supposed to be on my truck are 225-70-14 and I put on 225-75-15 so they're around 2 inches taller and they throw my speedometer off by 7.11% (when I'm doing 60 my speedo will read 56). So whenever I fill up and want to figure out my mileage, I multiply the distance on the odo by 1.0711 and find out my actual miles travelled.
|
Glad to hear that you've seen a benefit. I've looked into it and you are one of the few that's seen FE go up. Certainly the speedo needs recalibrated for different tire sizes. From what I've heard, I'd say fewer than 1 in 10 people report better FE with taller tires (after speedo re-calibration).
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
01-15-2012, 06:34 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
actually dave, quite a few have.
As a general note, frank lee commented that trucks doent see a benift.
But the trick to the equation is how much highway miles you are driving vs city driving.
Also you cant be going from 15 rims to 17 rims, because then the issue is the extra wieght. But a 4-7% increase in diameter (given hwy driving) absolutely will result in betterr mpg.
Just common sense alone would have to question your 1 in 10 statement.
|
|
|
|