Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2013, 07:53 PM   #81 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,594

RippinRoo - '05 Subaru Legacy Wagon 2.5 GT
Subaru
90 day: 21.16 mpg (US)

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

Olga - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon
90 day: 46.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 303
Thanked 311 Times in 186 Posts
From the article:
Quote:
Pretty soon, he may be locked out of the delivery truck market entirely.
Seriously? Just like Tesla was "locked out" of the luxury sedan market entirely?

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NachtRitter For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-03-2013, 12:02 AM   #82 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saskwatchian View Post
I am never going to be in the market for something like this but I would think that if it's going to sell in North America it needs power going to the rear wheels. I mean it is going to be a luxury work vehicle and luxury buyers want what they want. I can't see FWD going forward in this market, especially it it is also supposed to be a sporty truck.
RWD can be provided by hub-motors, which would still allow a low-profile frame to be used, getting a lower cargo boarding height without sacrificing the suspension travel. That's why I have been quoting the Fiat Ducato frame as a possible reference to guide the development of the upcoming Tesla truck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 01:51 AM   #83 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Have we discussed this in the last five and a half years?

Elon Musk Says the Tesla Pickup Has to Start at Less Than $50,000

Quote:
He also said it has to be better than an F-150 at truck things, and interestingly, it also has to be a better sports car than the Porsche 911. Just going to say it, but achieving both of those things in one vehicle seems extremely improbable.
I do not see how a $50,000 Tesla pickup would be possible. Google says the X costs $82,000, so if they just converted that to a pickup, it would be 62% higher than what Elon said, which should not surprise anyone.

The X may be faster than a 911, but it still costs $82,000. Can the X do 90% of truck things as well as an F-150?

I can see it being faster in a straight line and more useful as a truck--for $100,000 or more.

This is Tesla, potentially much more.

Favorite comment: "50K in Elon dollars is 80-90K."

A 2020 Porsche 911 costs $113,300.

Dang! It weighs 3,500 pounds!

Someone shared a rendering of an S converted into a pickup:



If a Ford Ranchero is a pickup.

How much extra for the lift kit?

Many comments say "Batteries not included" or "The bed is extra."

What will they call it? Ford trademarked both "Lightning" and "Model-T."
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 04:10 AM   #84 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
A pickup truck can be structurally much simpler to make.
The Model 3 floorpan f.i. consists of 70 or so parts; Tesla wants the Y to use just 4 parts for that and ultimately 1. But it requires a lot of effort to get to that.
A Pickup truck is much larger so it would be way easier to design it out of large parts and still retain crash safety. It should therefore be cheaper to build than a car, even if it takes more material.
$49,000 does not sound unreasonable.

More practical than a F150, faster than a 911... Bring it on. The unveiling will be 'later this year'.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 10:53 AM   #85 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,112 Times in 981 Posts
Scary thought: rednecks on a beer high offroading in a tesla pickup at 100mph. Can you say "Dukes of Hazzard"?

Saw my first rice rocket modified tesla friday last, all tricked out with wider tires, slammed, blacked out chrome, but no beer can exhaust.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 11:05 AM   #86 (permalink)
Redneck Ecomodder
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 437
Thanks: 11
Thanked 91 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
A pickup truck can be structurally much simpler to make.
The Model 3 floorpan f.i. consists of 70 or so parts; Tesla wants the Y to use just 4 parts for that and ultimately 1. But it requires a lot of effort to get to that.
A Pickup truck is much larger so it would be way easier to design it out of large parts and still retain crash safety. It should therefore be cheaper to build than a car, even if it takes more material.
$49,000 does not sound unreasonable.

More practical than a F150, faster than a 911... Bring it on. The unveiling will be 'later this year'.
The problem I see is that my F150 is mostly used to pull a 6,000 lb camper (which is admittedly about the most aerodynamically horrible abomination I've ever seen) 300-400 miles at a time. Unless the entire bed is filled with battery packs that's not going to happen on an EV. Also, many people pull camper Much further than that.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 11:17 AM   #87 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaneajanderson View Post
The problem I see is that my F150 is mostly used to pull a 6,000 lb camper (which is admittedly about the most aerodynamically horrible abomination I've ever seen) 300-400 miles at a time. Unless the entire bed is filled with battery packs that's not going to happen on an EV. Also, many people pull camper Much further than that.
That's a problem for you and those that pull campers. My guess is the majority of trucks are used to commute in, or light duty hauling of Home Depot goods. An EV truck will be perfect for contractors. I've got a Cummins full-size truck that I intend to never travel more than 150 miles round trip in.

Perhaps Elon made the $50k comment assuming battery prices would continue to decrease rapidly. Achieving that price point requires a sufficiently affordable battery.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Xist (06-04-2019)
Old 06-04-2019, 01:02 PM   #88 (permalink)
Redneck Ecomodder
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 437
Thanks: 11
Thanked 91 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
That's a problem for you and those that pull campers. My guess is the majority of trucks are used to commute in, or light duty hauling of Home Depot goods. An EV truck will be perfect for contractors. I've got a Cummins full-size truck that I intend to never travel more than 150 miles round trip in.

Perhaps Elon made the $50k comment assuming battery prices would continue to decrease rapidly. Achieving that price point requires a sufficiently affordable battery.
Well you're partly right, plenty of people use pickups as road warriors too, just driving empty down the highway for long road trips, which again isn't all that practical in an EV. For shorter trips with heavy loads, EV would be great, even a hybrid to extend the range: there's a reason modern heavy equipment often uses electric motors in the wheels and the diesel engine is just a glorified generator
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2019, 06:38 PM   #89 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,937

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,802 Times in 939 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Perhaps Elon made the $50k comment assuming battery prices would continue to decrease rapidly. Achieving that price point requires a sufficiently affordable battery.
Since he grew up in South Africa, I wonder if he never heard the trite phrase about what happens when you assume? He assumes his engineers will figure out full self-driving with the existing camera hardware on Teslas and no lidar by, what, next year sometime? This year even? (I can't remember what BS date he gave the last time he talked about it).
__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 07:17 AM   #90 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
Tesla batteries are already cheaper than $100/kWh at cell level, approaching that at pack level. So even a 200 kWh pack would not prevent a $49,000 price tag; the motors are assumed to cost less than $1000 each, there'd be more than $25,000 left for electronics and the body/structure.

Pulling a heavy load may half its 400 mile range, but it would not have to lose much time recharging at the right chargers. It would be able to take V3 supercharging at 250 kW until nearly full, and much more than that if even faster chargers come about.

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-05-2019), redpoint5 (06-05-2019)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com