Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2017, 01:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
tire sizing questions for a truck

Before I ask, yes I have done some reading/searching. Still have questions

The stock tire size for my 01 2wd s10 is 205/75/15. Everything I've looked at was talking more about cars than trucks. So my question is, would running a 205/70/15(5% shorter sidewall) be a benefit or not?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-10-2017, 02:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
Your speedo will be out by that much. And you'll be revving that much higher, therefore wasting that much more gas. If you went the other way, you might have some FE gains.

Your cheapest bet is to pump the tires up a good % over recommended, within the max pressure printed on the sidewall of your tires. But you'll probably gain the most by switching to a Low Rolling Resistance tire, if they make them for trucks in your size.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stubby79 For This Useful Post:
canadian_yeti (05-11-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 03:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
Don't put smaller tires on anything unless you are going to also lower the drive axle ratio.
When the first gen prius came out they advertised that it had smaller tires for better fuel economy ever since then people were convinced that putting smaller tires on their vehicle would help them too.. But the transmission gearing in the prius was designed around this smaller tire.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
canadian_yeti (05-11-2017), Fingie (05-10-2017)
Old 05-10-2017, 08:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
Smaller wheels often help, the craze for 20, then 22, then 24" wheels was terrible for performance in almost all aspects, economy, acceleration, ride, braking. Maybe handling could be benefited but probably not because they would losen up the rest of the suspension so the ride wouldn't kill you. Usually a low profile tire with a big diameter wheel will weigh more than a high profile tire and small diameter wheel that has the same overall outside diameter.
Smaller overall could help but as pointed out will raise rpm at equal speed. Smaller would lower the truck and reduce frontal aera. Some 2wd guys will run the smaller tire on just the front lowering the front end. Overall that wouldn't change the frontal aera and a lower airdam would have the same effect.
Overall I doubt the difference in a 205/75 vs a 205/70 would even be detectible. It looks like the 70 series less per tire and has low rolling resistance versions available which could be noticible.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
canadian_yeti (05-11-2017)
Old 05-11-2017, 01:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
i definitely will be lowering my axle gear ratio. my truck is currently 4.10 gears with drum brakes. i plan on going down to a 3.73 or 3.42 ratio and disc brakes using a rear axle from a blazer/jimmy. direct bolt in, lower ratio, better braking. win win. thanks guys
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017, 03:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadian_yeti View Post
Everything I've looked at was talking more about cars than trucks.
Does this matter?

When the S10 was designed, it shared more parts from the cars of the time than the trucks... It's basically the GM G-body with the largest trunk.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017, 05:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Does this matter?

When the S10 was designed, it shared more parts from the cars of the time than the trucks... It's basically the GM G-body with the largest trunk.
very true lol. never even considered that. although i did think last night that the stock tire size is the exact same size as whats stock on my grandpa's '05 buick century, so my truck falls more into the car category.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2017, 10:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
I would move up to a 225 or 235 section width. The more air a tire can hold the less the tire will deform.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2017, 09:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadian_yeti View Post
Before I ask, yes I have done some reading/searching. Still have questions

The stock tire size for my 01 2wd s10 is 205/75/15. Everything I've looked at was talking more about cars than trucks. So my question is, would running a 205/70/15(5% shorter sidewall) be a benefit or not?
First, read my webpages on the subject:

Barry's Tire Tech - Fuel Economy and Rolling Resistance

Barry's Tire Tech - Fuel Economy and Rolling Resistance2

Short version: Tire sizing plays a small role in rolling resistance. Better to spend time in the selection process (meaning make and model of tire).

As a general rule, larger tires are better for RR than smaller tires - BUT - see the statement above. Also, there are other tire properties where going larger is an advantage.

In your case, it is a bad idea to go from a 75 series to a 70 series. That's going smaller.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2017, 01:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 31
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
I would move up to a 225 or 235 section width. The more air a tire can hold the less the tire will deform.
a wider section width would mean that much more rubber touching the road. more surface area means more friction and more material to push. correct me if im wrong, but i would need to have a really good LRR tire set to max pressure just to break even compared to the same parameters for a 205 tire

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com