Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2010, 01:04 AM   #61 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by justpassntime View Post
Do race cars or speedboats have them? Nascar, F1, NHRA, to name a few.

Don't recall ever seeing any or an announcer making comment on them, and you know how NASCAR and NHRA guys like to talk.

If they did any good they would be used in race applications.

here is a pretty serious AI race car that uses the vortex generators
ww.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/m5lp_0804_sn96_mustang_race_car/index.htm
Also has some other fun little aereo tricks, vents on the fenders etc... lost of weight savings. Cool car and dear to the heart since one of my cars is a v8 mustang

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-12-2010, 02:23 AM   #62 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Link doesn't work for me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 11:46 AM   #63 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 45
Thanks: 59
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilgladstone View Post
Link doesn't work for me.
Try SN-95 Mustang AIX Race Car - Agent 47 Racer - 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine

Also, if anybody's got coastdown or cruise-control experimental data from VGs at the trailing edge of a hatchback, I'm interested.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 04:22 PM   #64 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by khafra View Post
Try SN-95 Mustang AIX Race Car - Agent 47 Racer - 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine

Also, if anybody's got coastdown or cruise-control experimental data from VGs at the trailing edge of a hatchback, I'm interested.
Interesting car, but the aerodynamic work is not designed for drag reduction. The rear wing, the VGs, the fender scoops and the wider hood are all adding drag. With the kind of power that beast is making, aero stability is king in simply keeping it on the road, and drag reduction is most decidedly not a priority. There appears to be no underbody or diffuser work at all, and the VGs probably do nothing as the wing is way up out of the rear end turbulence.

What sort of racing does the car do? Top speed stuff like NASCAR? I'm curious.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:54 PM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: d
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry to revive the thread, but does anyone know where to place VGs on a hatchback?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 08:55 PM   #66 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
As you have read in this thread, nobody has yet posted any solid, reliable evidence that VG's work at the end of a hatchback bodystyle to improve fuel economy.

I tested airtab style VG's , A-B-A, on both a sedan and minivan and could not detect any change in fuel consumption.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...fect-6381.html

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...olla-2390.html



I wouldn't bother with them, except in very specific circumstances (eg: sedans with steep rear glass and short deck lids).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 10:12 PM   #67 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: d
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 10:06 AM   #68 (permalink)
Permanent Lurker
 
seifrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348

Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k)
90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
I have found one more A-B-A test (AirTabs on Honda Fit): http://s89686473.onlinehome.us/airtabs-test.html

Personally, I am thinking of installing them on my Dacia Logan MCV (long station with vertical back end).


(image taken from Renault Car Rentals Renault Auto Rental)

I wonder if they will help as the rear back is somehow "tikered" - there are curvatures with sharp endings etc.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to seifrob For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (03-14-2012)
Old 03-14-2012, 11:16 AM   #69 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Thanks seifrob!

I'll describe/quote the main parts of the test you linked (http://s89686473.onlinehome.us/airtabs-test.html ), for posterity (these things have a bad habit of disappearing from the web):

Date posted: 2007

Vehicle: Honda Fit

VG's used: AirTabs

Methodology: coastdown test, 100-80 km/h, on a nearly level road, by dipping the clutch at 100 km/h, manually starting a timer, then stopping the timer @ 80 km/h. Baseline (no VG's); then 8 VG's across the end of the roof; then baseline repeated; then 8 VG's across the roof + 4 VG's on each side.

Results: (time in hundredths of seconds)

A1 (baseline, no VG's): 1550, 1647, 1607
B1 (8 VG's taped to roof): 1691, 1678, 1700, 1706
A2 (baseline, no airtabs): 1628, 1623, 1649
B2 (8 VG's taped to roof, plus 4 taped on each side): 1597, 1662, 1722, 1671

16.17 seconds: average time of the "A" runs coasting from 100 - 80 km/h.
16.78 seconds: average time of the "B" runs coasting from 100 - 80 km/h.
00.61 seconds: difference

Experimenter's conclusion & comments:

Quote:
Overall, the average time (in hundredths of a second) for both sets of test runs with Airtabs was 1678, 3.77% greater than the average times for the unmodified car of 1617. Seemingly not a huge difference, but it is very much statistically significant, according to this web t-test calculator, which claims that the probability of this event, assuming the null hypothesis, is 0.011.

The first run in set B2 was anomalously slow. I suspect this could be the result of the car cooling down (most importantly, I guess, the tires) while I took my time taping the Airtabs back on. Also, it started raining very lightly during the last run, again putting the Airtabs at a disadvantage.


Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	boxplot-downhill.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	6.4 KB
ID:	10515   Click image for larger version

Name:	fit-airtabs6.jpg
Views:	207
Size:	29.8 KB
ID:	10516  
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 11:37 AM   #70 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
I'd also like to point out some reasons we should be skeptical of the results in the above test. (Note I'm not saying "dismiss" his results, but why we should still question them.)

Also: the guy who posted the test deserves a lot of credit for thoroughly describing what he did.

1) The tester did not "remove himself" from the experiment, exposing the results to the potential effects of experimenter bias.

Experimenter bias risk could have been avoided by recording speed digitally, which also would have been more accurate, since the sampling rate of the recording could have then been used to time the runs (see below).

The potential for bias exists at 4 points: in the "reading/interpreting" of the analog speedometer; depressing the clutch & starting the timer; reading the speedometer at the end of the run; stopping the timer.

2) The accuracy of the results is questionable due to reaction time of the experimenter on the timer. Average human reaction time on a similar "clicking" task is about 0.22 seconds. (eg. Human Benchmark - Reaction Time Stats ).

Consider the average difference of the runs was 0.61 seconds, and you can see why this is important.

The experimenter himself points out the difficulty of being accurate:

Quote:
starting the timer exactly simultaneously with pushing the clutch pedal took me a while to learn.


3)
The test is complicated by placing additional VG's on the side of the car for the second "B" set of runs. It's not really an A-B-A-B test, it's an A-B-A-C test.

If you compare the numbers as 2 separate tests, you may get different results. EG: why did doubling the number of VG's apparently decrease coasting time between the two B runs. (The experimenter suggests it's due to light rain at the end of the second test.)

4) The experiment was also run in the opposite direction, and the results turned out to be not statistically significant:

Quote:
on the way back from each run, I measured the time in the other direction. In this other direction, whatever difference the airtabs made was not statistically significant, though [the raw data] still showed a slight gain.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th generation civic hatchback - improving aerodynamics AndrewJ Aerodynamics 396 06-13-2022 02:51 PM
Diesel- and Hybrid-Powered Vehicles Can Provide More Societal Benefits than Gas-Power SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 12 04-29-2017 09:03 AM
Video: Illustrating the Vast Importance of Aerodynamics (open hatchback experiment) Peakster Aerodynamics 17 02-15-2012 07:29 PM
Found a coastdown hill! Mini comparo: windows vs skirts vs hatchback MetroMPG Aerodynamics 4 11-28-2007 12:40 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com