11-21-2018, 08:18 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
We need ultra light four wheeled cars
All of the start ups such as Electra Meccanica and Archimoto are relegated to building three wheelers in order to circumvent nanny state crash testing. Mandating every car to obviate user responsibility via 500 kg's and $5,000 of safety structure and equipment is regressive. It prohibits development of ultralight 4 wheeled transportation which would be much more sustainable than the 2,000 kg monsters we are stuck making now. This mandate killed Aptera.
.
3 billion people cannot all have a 2,000 kg car that costs $40,000.
.
.
.
.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 10:50 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Thank the NHTSA and their insane "Towards Zero Deaths" policy.
Regarding Aptera, though: Aptera killed Aptera.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2018, 11:33 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Thank the NHTSA and their insane "Towards Zero Deaths" policy.
Regarding Aptera, though: Aptera killed Aptera.
|
Aptera floundered because they were forced to initially pursue a 3 wheeled format to circumvent crash certification. They had the vehicle essentially ready for production when the investors realized there were very few people willing to drive a 3 wheeled vehicle. So they tried to change the design to 4 wheels at the last minute which squandered any remaining working capital.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2018, 11:40 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding flying lizard
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743
Thanks: 618
Thanked 264 Times in 176 Posts
|
Totally agree with this. The lighter the average vehicle is, the less lethality it has to other vehicles in a crash. I was very surprised to read than the BMW I8 and its carbon fiber weighs MORE than my four dour V6 accord.
I was reading about those eco marathon urban concept vehicles yesterday, pretty cool! They would need to let them go faster than 25 mph though.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-
Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daschicken For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2018, 11:57 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Carbon fiber really isn't that good for building structural parts of a car.
In a crash steel bends, carbon fiber shatters.
Aluminum and or magnesium alloys would be better.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2018, 12:28 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
Aptera floundered because they were forced to initially pursue a 3 wheeled format to circumvent crash certification. They had the vehicle essentially ready for production when the investors realized there were very few people willing to drive a 3 wheeled vehicle. So they tried to change the design to 4 wheels at the last minute which squandered any remaining working capital.
|
Odd. Not-RElio generated quite a buzz and many pre-orders. You'd think with all that high-paid expertise on board at Aptera they'd have decided on the number of wheels before the 11th hour.
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 12:52 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,779
Thanks: 4,322
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
All of the start ups such as Electra Meccanica and Archimoto are relegated to building three wheelers in order to circumvent nanny state crash testing. Mandating every car to obviate user responsibility via 500 kg's and $5,000 of safety structure and equipment is regressive. It prohibits development of ultralight 4 wheeled transportation which would be much more sustainable than the 2,000 kg monsters we are stuck making now. This mandate killed Aptera.
|
Don't get me started.
The government has all sorts of nanny rules that don't make sense. It's illegal to be in a boat without life jackets onboard, but not illegal to be in the lake with no life jacket.
A car has to pass crash safety, and an occupant must wear a seatbelt, unless the person is riding a motorcycle.
All sorts of homeopathic "medicine" that is unregulated, but I can't go to a healthcare professional that isn't licensed, or licensed at a lower level than Dr or PA.
Government should allow unregulated (almost) everything, so long as the unregulated things clearly state they are unregulated, and that the user accepts a higher level of responsibility.
Consumer advocacy groups would pop up that would help guide people's decisions.
We live in absurd times.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:32 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Safety regulations aren’t about safety. They’re about protecting profit, preserving power. As old man Rockefeller had it, competition is a sin.
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:39 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,779
Thanks: 4,322
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
Safety regulations aren’t about safety. They’re about protecting profit, preserving power. As old man Rockefeller had it, competition is a sin.
|
It's a cycle of corruption where somehow those harmed feel that they have been served.
Politicians look great because they have grown government in the name of protecting citizens > Cartels prosper because barriers to entry have been imposed > Citizens feel safer because businesses proudly display a piece of paper saying the government has blessed them to perform the work.
Then someone gets hurt despite papers saying that shouldn't have happened, so government gets back to work growing...
|
|
|
11-22-2018, 12:25 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
I don’t have major issues with safety laws but I strongly disagree with platform laws
These laws in effect ban manual transmissions, multiple engine choices and even stopped Toyota from gluing on an 18lb solar panel to their sheet metal roof.
We need these eliminated
We need grey market laws dramatically changed
We need to have reciprocal laws in terms of crash and pollution standards with other first world nations like Japan and the Euro zone
Oh and all of the above could be stopped if we stop companies from writing their own regulations (like the guys below)
#Gasolinegate : Biofuels Digest
|
|
|
|