11-18-2010, 05:14 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Sayonara - no great loss.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-18-2010, 05:47 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
|
Bye bye.
|
|
|
11-18-2010, 07:01 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 191
Tahoe - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 90 day: 13.22 mpg (US) SRX - '04 Cadillac SRX AWD XL - '05 Harley Davidson Sportster XL 90 day: 49.97 mpg (US) Alero - '02 Oldsmobile Alero GLS Corvette - '75 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
No reason to be angry Aaron, you sound not much different then me. I enjoy my big truck and am looking to do what I cna because Mpg. are a fact of life now if you don't want to go broke. I believe as I stated earlier that a 5.3 would be your best bet there are many programmers out there with a economy mode you can switch back and forth when you are in different situations.
I don't think you could get a Z71 package on a 6cyl. so that will push you to the v8 also the higher suspension of the z71 will allow more air to go under the truck maybe a loweriung kit may be more in order for your future mods this will help grreatly.
Don't sweat the comments look at the location of where people are from not everyone is familiar with your surroundings or needs. I never understood the logic of many small car owners that rather have 3 vehicles that one truck can do but have learned to understand some of their reasoning by hanging around here for past couple months. lurk around for a while and read some of the articles you cna pick up a few tips that will get you a couple MPG better... best of luck in your search f or a truck.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Traverse *active*
2002 Oldsmobile Alero GLS *active*
2002 S10 2wd p/u 139,000mi. *active*
1975 Corvette Stingray *active*
1994 Camaro Z28 Convertible 149k *Sold 2013*
1998 Blazer ZR2 189k *Sold 2012*
1995 Tahoe LT 250k *Sold 2011*
|
|
|
11-18-2010, 08:53 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Hi. I'm new. I'm going to buy a Navistar CXT. I don't haul or tow anything. I commute 1 mile and cruise up and down main street evenings and weekends. I'm going to add a 12" lift and dragster-style zoomie pipes. Will an HHO generator tripple my fuel economy?
I'm all about fuel economy. Period.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-18-2010, 09:17 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
I live in Arkansas as well, and while a truck is nice for hauling stuff, for bad weather I would prefer a front wheel drive car with good tires or an SUV. A truck does poorly in bad weather compared to an SUV; the rear tires just don't have that much traction without adding a ton of stuff in the back. Even at that, if a truck is necessary, an s-10 with a 4 banger will do quite well in bad weather with sufficient weight in the back, yet still fetch 25-30 mpg if its a stick and driven well.
One must wonder how young this guy was; very is my guess.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
11-19-2010, 01:14 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
the v6 is epa rated at 17/23 and the v8 is rated at 16/20 for the 5 speeds, the automatic needs the bigger engine and looks to have a higher top gear so it gets 16/21
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 10:59 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronmiiller
i want a Z71 period there is no reason behind it that matters, i will have one
|
Then you'll have to pay the price for it.
Bye.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 11:08 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHRABill
pick up a few tips that will get you a couple MPG better...
|
A couple MPG simply won't cut it when starting out with a gasguzzler.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 11:50 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronmiiller
Looking to get a single cab silverado z71 between 99-04 model soon, i am looking for PURE FUEL ECONOMY. I do not tow anything i dont need any power and will be running a stock size tire. Once again, all i care about is fuel economy i will be installing aftermarket parts such as a cold air intake and exhaust (dont care what it sounds like just want it to breath better) and possibly a bully dog or something. Thanks alot guys.
|
Aaron, don't get upset, folks are just offering responses to your question. NHRABill, myself, and Frank Lee all have full-size trucks/SUV, totally understand the need for em. However you did say you were in it for pure fuel economy, if you don't tow and don't need power, why get a Silverado for economy? The Z71 option (at least on mine) is just decals and a skidplate - not really essential. The v6 and v8 get almost identical mpg, figure in the v6 gets driven harder to perform the same, its a tie. As others said, a 99-04 S-10 4 cyl will be better on gas, and way cheaper to buy.
|
|
|
11-20-2010, 11:59 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
In Europe, pick-up trucks are usually sold with a 4 in line (diesel) engine, with 2L to 2.5L displacement, 3L at worst.
Over 3L is a very marginal market of expensive toys.
It suits us, why wouldn't it suit Americans
PS : get a manual rather than automatic transmission.
|
Cuz we like big trucks - little motors don't suit us (except for commuting!). Dream ride would be a 3/4 ton 4x4 diesel with chrome stacks. Sad thing is it would get better mpg than some cars/most SUVs.
|
|
|
|