Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2010, 04:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Sayonara - no great loss.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-18-2010, 04:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Bye bye.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 06:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
NHRABill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 191

Tahoe - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LT
90 day: 13.22 mpg (US)

SRX - '04 Cadillac SRX AWD

XL - '05 Harley Davidson Sportster XL
90 day: 49.97 mpg (US)

Alero - '02 Oldsmobile Alero GLS

Corvette - '75 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
No reason to be angry Aaron, you sound not much different then me. I enjoy my big truck and am looking to do what I cna because Mpg. are a fact of life now if you don't want to go broke. I believe as I stated earlier that a 5.3 would be your best bet there are many programmers out there with a economy mode you can switch back and forth when you are in different situations.
I don't think you could get a Z71 package on a 6cyl. so that will push you to the v8 also the higher suspension of the z71 will allow more air to go under the truck maybe a loweriung kit may be more in order for your future mods this will help grreatly.

Don't sweat the comments look at the location of where people are from not everyone is familiar with your surroundings or needs. I never understood the logic of many small car owners that rather have 3 vehicles that one truck can do but have learned to understand some of their reasoning by hanging around here for past couple months. lurk around for a while and read some of the articles you cna pick up a few tips that will get you a couple MPG better... best of luck in your search f or a truck.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Traverse *active*
2002 Oldsmobile Alero GLS *active*
2002 S10 2wd p/u 139,000mi. *active*
1975 Corvette Stingray *active*
1994 Camaro Z28 Convertible 149k *Sold 2013*
1998 Blazer ZR2 189k *Sold 2012*
1995 Tahoe LT 250k *Sold 2011*

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 07:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Hi. I'm new. I'm going to buy a Navistar CXT. I don't haul or tow anything. I commute 1 mile and cruise up and down main street evenings and weekends. I'm going to add a 12" lift and dragster-style zoomie pipes. Will an HHO generator tripple my fuel economy?

I'm all about fuel economy. Period.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Joe_Bloe (11-19-2010), UFO (11-22-2010)
Old 11-18-2010, 08:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I live in Arkansas as well, and while a truck is nice for hauling stuff, for bad weather I would prefer a front wheel drive car with good tires or an SUV. A truck does poorly in bad weather compared to an SUV; the rear tires just don't have that much traction without adding a ton of stuff in the back. Even at that, if a truck is necessary, an s-10 with a 4 banger will do quite well in bad weather with sufficient weight in the back, yet still fetch 25-30 mpg if its a stick and driven well.

One must wonder how young this guy was; very is my guess.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 12:14 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
the v6 is epa rated at 17/23 and the v8 is rated at 16/20 for the 5 speeds, the automatic needs the bigger engine and looks to have a higher top gear so it gets 16/21
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 09:59 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronmiiller View Post
i want a Z71 period there is no reason behind it that matters, i will have one
Then you'll have to pay the price for it.
Bye.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 10:08 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHRABill View Post
pick up a few tips that will get you a couple MPG better...
A couple MPG simply won't cut it when starting out with a gasguzzler.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 10:50 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronmiiller View Post
Looking to get a single cab silverado z71 between 99-04 model soon, i am looking for PURE FUEL ECONOMY. I do not tow anything i dont need any power and will be running a stock size tire. Once again, all i care about is fuel economy i will be installing aftermarket parts such as a cold air intake and exhaust (dont care what it sounds like just want it to breath better) and possibly a bully dog or something. Thanks alot guys.
Aaron, don't get upset, folks are just offering responses to your question. NHRABill, myself, and Frank Lee all have full-size trucks/SUV, totally understand the need for em. However you did say you were in it for pure fuel economy, if you don't tow and don't need power, why get a Silverado for economy? The Z71 option (at least on mine) is just decals and a skidplate - not really essential. The v6 and v8 get almost identical mpg, figure in the v6 gets driven harder to perform the same, its a tie. As others said, a 99-04 S-10 4 cyl will be better on gas, and way cheaper to buy.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 10:59 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
In Europe, pick-up trucks are usually sold with a 4 in line (diesel) engine, with 2L to 2.5L displacement, 3L at worst.
Over 3L is a very marginal market of expensive toys.

It suits us, why wouldn't it suit Americans


PS : get a manual rather than automatic transmission.

Cuz we like big trucks - little motors don't suit us (except for commuting!). Dream ride would be a 3/4 ton 4x4 diesel with chrome stacks. Sad thing is it would get better mpg than some cars/most SUVs.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Group Buy: OBD1 to OBD1 Extension Harness NachtRitter For Sale 8 08-18-2009 10:42 PM
June 2009 Headway Group Buy frodus For Sale 1 06-09-2009 01:05 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com