02-16-2012, 01:09 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Impulse Emission Vapouriser Muffler
Shopping for mufflers online to replace my aging one, and hoping to find something lighter, thinner, and not noisy, I came across this one: Negative Supercharging Emission Vapouriser Muffler - Impulse Engine Technologies Pty Ltd - Australia
Perhaps it belongs in the unicorn corral, perhaps not, I don't know. Look at their emissions data. Given the recent discussion about CATs and cooling during EOC, this seems interesting. But I will not be getting one... it would not fit my car, I bet its costly, and well... I'm skeptical of the site's claims for FE and for some of the emissions benefits. What do you think?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 01:34 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
California98Civic -
I am *guessing* unicorn because this would be a better mousetrap (aka better cat) if it worked. It doesn't mention NOx, but that's ok. Hmmmmm, it's based in Australia :
Quote:
Impulse Engine Technology P/L
PO Box 986
Randwick NSW 2031
Australia
|
CarloSW2
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 02:11 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
those auzies know a thing or two about cars.
on the ford side that did some amazing intakes systems for the 200 & 250 ci straight six engines.
THey are in demand on older mustangs.
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 02:34 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
you need to look at the whole website...these guys build engines
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 11:01 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
The exhausts heat these plates right, and then the plates vaporise these emissions right, and the emissions couldn't be vaporised by the hot exhausts that heated the plates in the first place, right?
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 02:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
|
If you are worried about the converter operating too cool (and getting plugged up with soot) just relocate it close to the exhaust manifold, wrap it with exhaust wrap and seal it, do both or just do a cat delete.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 02:09 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 151
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
The exhausts heat these plates right, and then the plates vaporise these emissions right, and the emissions couldn't be vaporised by the hot exhausts that heated the plates in the first place, right?
|
I know, if they had said that the plates were stainless steel or some other potentially reactive metal, maybe. And I know a little about acoustics and I've never seen a muffler like that. I looked at another page, negative pressure supercharger engine kit I think. It reads like unicorn poop.
-mort
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:24 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
California98Civic -
I am *guessing* unicorn because this would be a better mousetrap (aka better cat) if it worked. It doesn't mention NOx, but that's ok. Hmmmmm, it's based in Australia :
CarloSW2
|
I noticed the NOx omission too in some of their results too. On another part of the site, IIRC, they showed that their muffler has little or no benefit with that pollutant, I think. But they posted video (edited video) of a comparative test between just a CAT and the CAT plus their "EV8" ... it shows what it alleges are sceenshots of the toyota's emissions: As for the suspicion about gasses heating the plates that then reduce the gasses, I gather the point is that it seems circular and impossible. But certainly, cleaning out CO2 and other parts of the exhaust's composition does not mean the elimination of ALL the exhaust gas, correct? It's the toxics and other pollutant gasses they want to reduce, there would still be hot exhaust coming out of the tail pipe.
As I said, I'm not interested in buying one. In fact the real reason I posted it here is to subject it to the EM vetting. Sites are so rosy in their representations of their inventions... This thread's vetting now enters the interwebs' search results.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
Last edited by California98Civic; 02-16-2012 at 07:11 PM..
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 03:43 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
Oxygen jumps up from 2.5% to 4.3%, fishier than a mermaids... bits.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
02-16-2012, 06:21 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
jakobnev -
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
Oxygen jumps up from 2.5% to 4.3%, fishier than a mermaids... bits.
|
Here are the numbers from the YouTube :
If the "CO" goes to nothing, I suppose they will claim that the O in CO is recombined to form more 02 ... but I agree it's fishy. I mean, where did the "C"(arbon) go? ... Wait a minute. I'll bet the emissions tester wouldn't measure raw carbon. Sooooo, that would imply (to me) that there is more uncombined carbon, aka soot, coming out, yes?!?!?
CarloSW2
Last edited by cfg83; 02-16-2012 at 07:32 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|