Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-04-2010, 01:45 PM   #41 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopsQube View Post
I was going to say roughly the same thing about the battery. If the battery is in good shape and charging normally, that's pretty much all the stabilization the electrical system needs.

Not only that, but if you have a Scan Gauge or an aftermarket volt meter (that doesn't have built-in suppression), heck, even a simple digital multimeter, you can see how steady the voltage is while the car is running, especially at speed and after the alternator is up to full working temp.

The only component that would need any kind of filtration would be the ECU, but the ECU already has sufficient filtration built in, hence no need for such nonsense as the "anal probe" that the Fuel Doc is ripping people off with.
In there defense you need a Oscilloscope to see the delta in the voltage, but again looking at the pdf in my above link I find it hard to believe that slight more filtering would affect much .
I am very skeptical of only dyno tests, you can make outcome whatever you like especially if your dealing in very small % .
In there test they show an increase of ampere amount but at same voltage , hmm to me only way to get that is to introduce more load (resistance ) . It probably be pretty hard to maintain x current usage on newer ECU system, as just about everything is controlled now by ECU .


Last edited by EdKiefer; 07-04-2010 at 02:28 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-04-2010, 04:31 PM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 48

the dented fly - '96 pontiac firefly
90 day: 52.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
People need to realize that a modern fuel injected engine is extremely effective at delivering and burning fuel at the right portions. If I remember right a modern engine buns about 99.7% of the fuel. Any gizmo that claims to increase FE by making the engine deliver or burn the fuel more efficiently has got to be full of stuff... accept for fuel line magnets they align the fuel molecules to make a more powerful explosion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2010, 05:28 PM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
MaxHedrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 60

Golf TDI - '10 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 37.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Hahah ... I sure hope that last part was a joke.
__________________

Driven: 2010 VW Golf TDI
Driven less: 2001 Audi TT Roadster (225)
Parked: 1982 VW Jetta Diesel
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 12:48 PM   #44 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxHedrm View Post
Hahah ... I sure hope that last part was a joke.
+1 on that one!

Something else that has occurred to me; somewhere I learned an older car (ie more than 100k miles on it, or 5+years old) tends to experience some corrosion and degredation of wires which puts more strain on the electrical system. The solution was to put in a larger battery to ease out the extra strain, ie adding a capacitor would also help.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 01:36 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
Voltage drop

"Something else that has occurred to me; somewhere I learned an older car (ie more than 100k miles on it, or 5+years old) tends to experience some corrosion and degredation of wires which puts more strain on the electrical system.

The solution was to put in a larger battery to ease out the extra strain, ie adding a capacitor would also help."


no ,
that is NOT the solution and adding a capacitor will not help either.

the solution is to do voltage drop testing , ie measure voltage lost across a given wire UNDER LOAD using a DVOM - negative test lead on the most negative side positive test lead on the most positive side

if you screw up and reverse the test leads ,
it does not matter , the value will be negative , just reverse the test leads and retest
or just use the negative amplitude value .

the value must be under 50mv for a smart circuit like a circuit with sensors in it or
under 100mv for a dumb circuit like a circuit with computer operated actuators ie injectors , solenoids , relays , etc
or
under 200mv for supply or starting circuits
like alternators and heater blowers and cooling fans and starters

if you find higher than specified voltage drop , locate and replace the bad component which means replace the connector or solder on new eyelets or replace the cable or what ever it takes to
get voltage drop back to specification
=========================
never use an ohm meter for this
unless you enjoy chasing your own tail with out ever catching it.

Last edited by mwebb; 07-05-2010 at 01:39 PM.. Reason: clarification
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 02:19 PM   #46 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwebb View Post
"Something else that has occurred to me; somewhere I learned an older car (ie more than 100k miles on it, or 5+years old) tends to experience some corrosion and degredation of wires which puts more strain on the electrical system.

The solution was to put in a larger battery to ease out the extra strain, ie adding a capacitor would also help."


no ,
that is NOT the solution and adding a capacitor will not help either.

the solution is to do voltage drop testing , ie measure voltage lost across a given wire UNDER LOAD using a DVOM - negative test lead on the most negative side positive test lead on the most positive side

if you screw up and reverse the test leads ,
it does not matter , the value will be negative , just reverse the test leads and retest
or just use the negative amplitude value .

the value must be under 50mv for a smart circuit like a circuit with sensors in it or
under 100mv for a dumb circuit like a circuit with computer operated actuators ie injectors , solenoids , relays , etc
or
under 200mv for supply or starting circuits
like alternators and heater blowers and cooling fans and starters

if you find higher than specified voltage drop , locate and replace the bad component which means replace the connector or solder on new eyelets or replace the cable or what ever it takes to
get voltage drop back to specification
=========================
never use an ohm meter for this
unless you enjoy chasing your own tail with out ever catching it.
right that is the reason they sell those ground kits . the ground side of vehicle electrical system is weak link most times as its dealing with body .
Even though many may have multiple ground points from battery >body>trans>engine etc when new . What can happens is with high usage of aluminum and dissimilar metals corrosion occurs . either way voltage drop is way to pin down the issue .
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2010, 04:15 PM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: canada
Posts: 48

the dented fly - '96 pontiac firefly
90 day: 52.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxHedrm View Post
Hahah ... I sure hope that last part was a joke.
I was joking about the fuel line magnets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 09:20 PM   #48 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Fuel Doctor FD-47 fails the Consumer Reports mpg test

Quote:
When we put it through our extensive testing on a number of vehicles, we found that it made no significant difference in any evaluation. As far as we can tell, all it does is light up when it’s plugged in.

We tested two samples of the FD-47 on 10 vehicles, with different types of engines, including four-cylinder models, standard and turbocharged V6s, and gas and turbodiesel-powered V8s. We ran each vehicle through our standard series of acceleration and fuel-economy tests, and the results were virtually the same with or without the device. The company says that the Fuel Doctor is recommended for use on vehicles 24 months old and older but that positive effects can be expected on many newer vehicles as well. Two of our test vehicles were older than 24 months.

In the past, we’ve tested bolt-on devices that were claimed to provide big fueleconomy and performance improvements, including the Fuel Genie, Platinum Gas Saver, and Tornado Fuel Saver. But we have yet to find one that makes a significant difference.
source: http://blogs.consumerreports.org/car...-mpg-test.html

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 09:22 PM   #49 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
All I can say is DRAT!

I was really hoping this would be the one!
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 01:46 AM   #50 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
Send a message via MSN to markweatherill
Big Oil wins again!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: Can Skinnier Tires Increase Fuel Economy? Peakster EcoModding Central 67 06-06-2019 01:27 AM
Uk ford transit, economy increase? chipX EcoModding Central 14 10-11-2012 03:38 AM
17 MPG increase on the cheap!!! jonathan150cc Success Stories 13 07-06-2010 05:40 PM
performance chips. Do they really increase MPG? regor EcoModding Central 3 07-02-2008 04:08 PM
FP Plus for Gasoline. Does it increase MPG? regor EcoModding Central 1 06-30-2008 01:52 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com