Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2014, 07:41 PM   #31 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Just sent the 2001-2005 FSM.

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
Daox (06-16-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-14-2014, 07:47 PM   #32 (permalink)
Drive less save more
 
ecomodded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189

Dusty - '98 VOLKSWAGEN Beetle TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 60.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarguy01 View Post
Not true. I put new bushings on my control arms and my alignment is a bit off.

Well something is buggered up because it is not part of the alignment adjustments unless they are adjustable, stock ones are not.
I have done this work to vehicles both with adjustable control arms which you adjust the length of each one and the easy as pie non adjustable stock ones that you just swap.


So when you replace the control arm the ONLY possible change would be the position left side to right side of the axle/axles, so its centered under the car.
that's it.
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________




Last edited by ecomodded; 06-14-2014 at 08:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 09:12 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sarguy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 468

Mazda5 - '12 Mazda 5
90 day: 25.22 mpg (US)

Big D - '11 Dodge Durango Crew
90 day: 18.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded View Post
Well something is buggered up because it is not part of the alignment adjustments unless they are adjustable, stock ones are not.
I have done this work to vehicles both with adjustable control arms which you adjust the length of each one and the easy as pie non adjustable stock ones that you just swap.


So when you replace the control arm the ONLY possible change would be the position left side to right side of the axle/axles, so its centered under the car.
that's it.
The car was aligned using 92,000 mile old, worn rubber bushings. Throw in new, tight bushings and the control arm position is a little off, which will throw the alignment a little off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2014, 03:20 AM   #34 (permalink)
Drive less save more
 
ecomodded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189

Dusty - '98 VOLKSWAGEN Beetle TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 60.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
I agree with you , I should have agreed with you previously as there are no hard and fast rules to front ends and individual cars. ,Worn parts do get happy in their sloppy positions and often you need to replace all worn parts at once. You can't just do 1 ball joint and think all is well, chances are both upper and lower ball joints are worn on both sides, and the tie rod ends are sloppy. Everything has its a lifespan , rubber and grease fittings dry out and it wears.
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2014, 08:57 AM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sarguy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 468

Mazda5 - '12 Mazda 5
90 day: 25.22 mpg (US)

Big D - '11 Dodge Durango Crew
90 day: 18.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded View Post
I agree with you , I should have agreed with you previously as there are no hard and fast rules to front ends and individual cars. ,Worn parts do get happy in their sloppy positions and often you need to replace all worn parts at once. You can't just do 1 ball joint and think all is well, chances are both upper and lower ball joints are worn on both sides, and the tie rod ends are sloppy. Everything has its a lifespan , rubber and grease fittings dry out and it wears.
No worries. I think the biggest issue is that the bushings are new and put the control arm in a slightly different position. Now, since they are a bit off, the toe in/out was probably changed slightly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 11:14 AM   #36 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
As I wind down on fixing the Sunfire, I'm starting work on the Civic. So, last night I put it in the garage to start the head replacement, and check out the suspension. I removed the front driver's side wheel to check out that control arm bushing. This is what I found:



So, it definitely needs replacing. There is a groove worn in the metal from the control arm digging into the control arm mount, so its been that way for some time. I agree with ecomodded that it doesn't look like its adjustable. I should be able to just throw in a new bushing and be good. But, I'll probably go have a 'free alignment check' done somewhere to make sure.

What is the best replacement/fix for this? I see energy suspension has some polyurethane bushings. They're substantially more expensive than the OEM style. But, if they last they might be worth it?

I also started taking things apart to do the head. I mostly just got the intake plumbing removed last night. I'm still amazed by the lack of rust... it makes working on the car SO easy.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20140625_171422.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	85.5 KB
ID:	15265   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20140625_171442.jpg
Views:	202
Size:	100.7 KB
ID:	15266   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20140625_180013.jpg
Views:	206
Size:	94.1 KB
ID:	15267  
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (06-26-2014), Joggernot (06-27-2014)
Old 06-26-2014, 01:19 PM   #37 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
poly bushings

I need to replace some of these too. Procrastinating it because there are so many other projects. I'm thinking of sticking to OEM. I read that the poly bushings are easier to install but squeek a lot and are stiffer and so transfer more road shocks to the suspension and frame, making a rougher, louder ride. I can't imagine an eco benefit from all that, so I'll go OEM when I do it.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
Daox (06-26-2014)
Old 06-26-2014, 04:42 PM   #38 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
As I wind down on fixing the Sunfire, I'm starting work on the Civic. So, last night I put it in the garage to start the head replacement, and check out the suspension. I removed the front driver's side wheel to check out that control arm bushing. This is what I found:



So, it definitely needs replacing. There is a groove worn in the metal from the control arm digging into the control arm mount, so its been that way for some time. I agree with ecomodded that it doesn't look like its adjustable. I should be able to just throw in a new bushing and be good. But, I'll probably go have a 'free alignment check' done somewhere to make sure.

What is the best replacement/fix for this? I see energy suspension has some polyurethane bushings. They're substantially more expensive than the OEM style. But, if they last they might be worth it?
Those are the compliance bushings, and it is very common for them to tear like that. I'd have to double check the FSM, but I think the recommended fix is actually to replace the control arms. To replace just the bushing, it needs to be pressed out and it's not easy since the metal sleeve is fairly thin and can be fused by rust.

I didn't have a press readily available, so I cut them out with a hacksaw. Labor intensive, but it did the job. I went with the polyurethane bushings (specifically Prothane 8-215). I prefer a more firm suspension, they were cheaper ($40) than what I was finding from Honda, and most importantly for me... you don't need a press to install them.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I also started taking things apart to do the head. I mostly just got the intake plumbing removed last night. I'm still amazed by the lack of rust... it makes working on the car SO easy.

I am so glad I don't live in rust-prone areas. ALL cars around here are like that.

You will likely find 2-3 engine mounts torn. The front and rear handle the reaction from the engine torque and tend to tear, and the fluid filled mount on the driver's side is not very robust. I went with polyurethane inserts on the front and rear mounts and it adds a significant amount of NVH. It's enough to bother me and I typically have no problem with solid mounted V8s. Go with stock engine mounts if you have to replace.

Are you eliminating power steering while you are in there?
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (06-26-2014), Daox (06-26-2014)
Old 06-26-2014, 04:48 PM   #39 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
... I think the recommended fix is actually to replace the control arms. To replace just the bushing, it needs to be pressed out and it's not easy since the metal sleeve is fairly thin and can be fused by rust.

I didn't have a press readily available, so I cut them out with a hacksaw. Labor intensive, but it did the job. I went with the polyurethane bushings (specifically Prothane 8-215). I prefer a more firm suspension, they were cheaper ($40) than what I was finding from Honda, and most importantly for me... you don't need a press to install them.
That's interesting. If the poly bushing alone was cheaper than a full control arm replacement with rubber bushings, I'd possibly rethink them. Seems slightly more sensible to replace only the failing part (the bushing) rather than the fail and a perfectly serviceable part (the control arm). How much of a cornering difference does the poly bushing make?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 05:52 PM   #40 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Those are the compliance bushings, and it is very common for them to tear like that. I'd have to double check the FSM, but I think the recommended fix is actually to replace the control arms. To replace just the bushing, it needs to be pressed out and it's not easy since the metal sleeve is fairly thin and can be fused by rust.

I didn't have a press readily available, so I cut them out with a hacksaw. Labor intensive, but it did the job. I went with the polyurethane bushings (specifically Prothane 8-215). I prefer a more firm suspension, they were cheaper ($40) than what I was finding from Honda, and most importantly for me... you don't need a press to install them.
Have you had any issues with squeaking?





Quote:
You will likely find 2-3 engine mounts torn. The front and rear handle the reaction from the engine torque and tend to tear, and the fluid filled mount on the driver's side is not very robust. I went with polyurethane inserts on the front and rear mounts and it adds a significant amount of NVH. It's enough to bother me and I typically have no problem with solid mounted V8s. Go with stock engine mounts if you have to replace.

Are you eliminating power steering while you are in there?
Thanks, I'll definitely take a look at the engine mounts.

I'll probably leave the power steering. I'm still not sure what I'm going to do with the car. I may just flip it for some cash. If it were manual I'd keep it in a heartbeat... but its not. Yet, its a lot cleaner and its more efficient than the Sunfire... Decisions.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com