Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2010, 06:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
Acetone...is there a conspiracy?

Hope this doesn't SCARE anyone on this forum.....


Article:Truth About Acetone and Ethanol - PESWiki

Test car: 1985 Ford T-Bird 5.0L V8 EPA rating 15 MPG city and 22 MPG highway.

Emissions test using pure 87 octane gas resulted in Hydrocarbons of 190ppm at idle. Fail is 220. O2 was 1.5%. This was suggestive of a small exhaust leak, which the O2 sensor read and richened fuel:air mixture a little too much.

Emissions test using 1 oz. Acetone to 1 gal. gasoline resulted in Hydrocarbons dropping to 111ppm at idle. O2 at 1.5%.

Highway test with this mixture resulted in 23.5 MPG. According to data on the internet, at this very high amount of acetone, MPG should have dropped far below factory. That it actually got slightly better than factory gave away the secret. The slight exhaust leak had richened the mixture of fuel:air and caused a SLIGHT utilization of the acetone.

I saw that the O2 sensor played a part in my results. What I did next was create an INTENTIONAL slight exhaust leak, in front of the sensor to increase O2 in exhaust, to cause computer to richen even more. [leak causes sucking in of fresh air].

Emissions test resulted in increase of Hydrocarbons from the previous 111ppm to 144ppm at idle. O2 went from 1.5% up to 5.2%

Noticeable increase in HP of at least 25%.

Multiple hwy. tests revealed 45mpg.

This is slightly more than a 100% increase over factory.

Tested at .7 oz. per gal. went down to 41 MPG.

Tested at 2 oz. per gal. went down to 30 MPG.

By process of elimination, the best acetone mix for my current fuel:air richness is around 1 oz. per gal.


The secret, known to racing technology, banned and forgotten a half a century ago, is that such fuels as acetone REQUIRE richening of the fuel:air mixture to make use of them. It is said that in those early days of racing, some used as much as 10% acetone additive. I am using less than 1%. Specifically 1:128.

With my emissions at slightly cleaner than gasoline, but my MPG at double what it was, a REAL REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS has been achieved. Fully 50% reduction.

The recent G8 summit set the goal of reducing emissions by 50% by the year 2050. President Bush has signed in to law the requirement for vehicles to get 37mpg by 2020.

We have the technology RIGHT NOW to achieve this IMMEDIATELY.

Reprogramming auto computers is already possible and programs and devices are on the market to do so.

A simple solution for the do-it-yourself mechanic, until the use of the technology becomes affordable and the additives are at the pump, is to TRICK your O2 sensors into making the computer richen. This can be done by either creating an exhaust leak in front of the sensor or by removing the sensor from the exhaust and letting it read pure atmosphere, which is 20.9% O2. The latter will richen mixture to MAXIMUM allowing the most acetone possible and the most HP AND MPG. I have not tried the latter and do not know how well it would work or to what level of increase in HP and MPG might be possible. Try this at YOUR OWN RISK.

* read the Addendum at the bottom of the page....

__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-04-2010, 08:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vtec-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 507

De Yaris - '04 toyota yaris T2
90 day: 69.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Interesting indeed. How truthful is it i wonder?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 08:16 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 08:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...FWIW acetone dissolves fuel-system gaskets and eats at aluminum.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 12:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts


From the site.
Quote:
New vehicles will FAIL EMISSIONS TESTS if too much O2 is reported by the computer. So make your exhaust leak sealable and reseal it for your test. If you remove the sensor, simply replace for the test.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Si engine and trans
 
90crxHF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spring, Tx
Posts: 53

CRX Si/HF - '90 Honda CRX HF
90 day: 40.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Okay, I've read as many of these "Acetone" articles as I can find. It always seems to be half and half... Some people say the stuff worked in their car, and others say it lessened their FE.

My question is, has anyone here tried the stuff?? So it eats at aluminum, has this been proven? It eats at gasonline gaskets in the fuel system, has this been proven? Sorry, I just want to see some data from guys who seem to have a better handle on the differernt variables that come into play... And you ecomodder guys are the ones to test this....
__________________
~1990 Honda CRX HF - ZC SOHC 1.6L non-VTEC, Si trans, Illuminas, Neuspeed Race
1/8th: 9.90 @ 71.03, 60' - 2.41 (HMP '08) - 284K on chassis and ~110k on engine
~1996 Mustang GTS/248A - 1/4: 13.447 @ 99.75, 60' - 1.820 (HRP - 959' DA)
http://www.nearlysurrounded.com <-- Check out my band

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 03:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263

Winsight - '06 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 72.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
You made basically the same thread already.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...mpg-12420.html

Comparing a DIY "highway test" to the EPA's highway test is invalid.
It's full of red herrings and as admitted in the addendum, errors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 03:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263

Winsight - '06 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 72.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
Furthermore, you support every out there BS snake oil way of increasing your mileage.

Troll anyone?

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post161491
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...oad-11784.html
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...red-11235.html
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tive-9011.html
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post49106
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ypes-7206.html
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post139441

It's the same stuff over and over.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 04:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90crxHF View Post
My question is, has anyone here tried the stuff?? So it eats at aluminum, has this been proven? It eats at gasonline gaskets in the fuel system, has this been proven?....
...well, I'm not an anyone (maybe a nobody?) but, yes, *I* tried it and those were the results that *I* got during my experiment.

...you're more than welcome to repeat the experiment(s) for yourself, using your car engine as a "guinea pig," but remember: you were forewarned of the BAD things that can happen...as they say: YMMV and so will your results.

Last edited by gone-ot; 03-04-2010 at 04:45 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 04:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 subaru wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...FWIW acetone dissolves fuel-system gaskets and eats at aluminum.
darn.

I was going to inquire about adding it to maines slop of crap called 87 octane made of fermented wood.

I seem to be moving the "diesel" back out of the tank now anyhow.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My acetone results 5EFE EcoModding Central 24 12-05-2015 11:42 PM
MetroMPG.com mailbag: why don't you test acetone? MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 21 11-18-2014 05:00 PM
Acetone. Lets get to the bottom of this Nerys EcoModding Central 31 07-27-2009 01:55 PM
Adding acetone? saunders1313 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 13 09-26-2008 09:23 AM
The acetone test trikkonceptz EcoModding Central 88 06-16-2008 10:27 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com