06-16-2018, 02:38 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,754
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,472 Times in 3,437 Posts
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-17-2018, 12:17 AM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 1,790
Thanks: 320
Thanked 358 Times in 299 Posts
|
A lot depends on the way the truck is being used. Vibration and harmonics play a big part in engine durability. Back in the '80's a local highway supervisor put a 3-51 GMC diesel and a Clark 5 speed transmission in a Chevy C-10. I recall he got 22 mpg and had saddle fuel tanks for a 1700 mile cruise range. This was his inspection vehicle.
|
|
|
06-18-2018, 02:09 AM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
The first non-turbo Cummins one ton Dodge (1989) was hitting 27-mpg solo. Sure got my interest. And unlike the GM & Ford, could actually pull a grade with a load.
And that defines pickups. An empty bed isn’t representative. Irrelevant, any data on solo driver & no work being performed.
|
|
|
06-18-2018, 05:51 AM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Too many cars
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 1,355
Thanked 801 Times in 477 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
The first non-turbo Cummins one ton Dodge (1989) was hitting 27-mpg solo. Sure got my interest. And unlike the GM & Ford, could actually pull a grade with a load.
And that defines pickups. An empty bed isn’t representative. Irrelevant, any data on solo driver & no work being performed.
|
You mean non-intercooled? I thought they were all turbo?
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro
|
|
|
06-28-2018, 06:24 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasoline Fumes
You mean non-intercooled? I thought they were all turbo?
|
There was a non-turbo Mitsubishi engine before the Cummins, but it wasn't so popular. OTOH the Cummins had always been available with turbo.
|
|
|
08-01-2018, 03:41 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Just read this today. https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news...four-cylinder/
Quote:
GM revives revered 'Tripower' name for new fuel-efficient four-cylinder
No, this doesn't mean the GTO is coming back.
|
348 lb×ft of torque not a turd at all!
__________________
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 12:50 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
I saw a living breathing version of the original tripower on a 327 in a coup from the 40s last week. Very cool looking at old engines that look so simple. I love simple. The carbs were the most complex thing on the motor.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:22 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Ha! My first car had the same engine GM dropped in the Tempest body to make the Tri-Power GTO (389 c.i.).
My car's 389 was the "uni-power" version though. 2-barrel carb.
^ Bonneville shown, but my Catalina looked the same. Trunk was big enough to rent out on Airbnb.
What was your first car, and first eco-car?
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 11:09 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Well in 1966 it may have been it's own model, but it still was just a packaged Lemans. Just like the Plymouth Roadrunner was a packaged Belvedere, or the Satellite, or the GTX. Hey speaking of Plymouth and 3x2bbl carbs, what makes me think we won't be seeing the name "six-pac" applied to anything from Fiat in the near future? They are a pretty gutsy company with the Hellcat and Demon.
|
|
|
08-04-2018, 11:54 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Saskatoon, canada
Posts: 1,488
Thanks: 746
Thanked 565 Times in 447 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Chevrolet's full-size Silverado has a 4-cylinder turbo option for 2019. (Has there ever been a four in a full-size before? Does the Toyota T-100 count?)
It even has a cylinder de-activation mode, capable of running on 2 cyls.
It's a big four: 2.7 L, which is the same size as one of Ford's EcoBoost V6's.
Details:
- 310 hp -- 25 more than their current 4.3L V6
- 348 lb-ft of torque at 1,500 rpm -- 43 more than the 4.3
- 7 seconds 0-60 mph claim
- same payload / towing specs as the base F-150 (v6) and Ram 1500 (v6)
Fuel economy:
- GM's only saying "better than competitors", but no specifics yet.
- The engine has: parasitic drag-reducing electric water pump
- stop/start, plus...
- cylinder deactivation.
- Also, the base 2019 4-cyl truck is 380 lbs lighter than the base 2018 model.
GM made fun of Ford for introducing aluminum in the truck body. Will Ford make fun of GM for selling a four?
Article: Yes, You Can Get a Four-cylinder in the 2019 Chevrolet Silverado - The Truth About Cars
|
I work with guy that claims his 2019 Silverado does an instantaneous 6.0 l/100 km on the highway at 110 kph/70 mph.
Anyone with some data to post?
I am looking to replace my old SUV (Hyundai Santa Fe at 290K) ... doing maybe 11 l/100 km or 21 miles per us gallon. I would like some options when this vehicle dies. It may die tomorrow, it could take another 2 years ...
I think I NEED ground clearance more than 4 inches (honda civic) and can survive a gravel road at 55 mph, a railroad crossing at 60 mph. Would like electric or hybrid.
So far, Mitsubishi's Outlander Plugin hybrid looks reasonable. $55K canadian, no towing. Test drive went OK but it didn't scream 'BUY ME'.
If the 2019 Chevy Silverado will do 6-ish liters per 100 km or 40-ish miles per US gallon ... after warming up of course .. and it tows like a real truck ... I should add it to the list.
__________________
In THEORY there is no difference between Theory and Practice
In PRACTICE there IS!
|
|
|
|