Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-27-2014, 12:26 AM   #471 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Then maybe we could cheer Darwin on?

(Or am I just a horrible, terrible person for saying that?)

-soD

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-27-2014, 12:33 AM   #472 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
Then maybe we could cheer Darwin on?

(Or am I just a horrible, terrible person for saying that?)

-soD
Couple of thoughts....
Maybe your just a horrible person if you DONT say it??

And remind me why we are cheering Darwin on???
( I have lost track of all the subplots in thus thread)
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 01:19 AM   #473 (permalink)
Wanting more for less
 
D.O.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313

Metric - '94 Honda Magna 250
Motorcycle
90 day: 69.83 mpg (US)

RedCelica - '94 Toyota Celica ZR
90 day: 35.97 mpg (US)

i30 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)

i30-22 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
Here's a paper that seems to be supporting fuel magnets.

Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on Hydrocarbon Fuel Viscosity and Engine Performance | Aktar | IJMCA
(Click on the PDF download near the bottom)

I'd be interested in any informed comments on their testing methods and conclusions.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 01:30 AM   #474 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'd feel better about an SAE reviewed paper.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 02:06 AM   #475 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurcher
 
mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 149
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.O.G. View Post
Here's a paper that seems to be supporting fuel magnets.

Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on Hydrocarbon Fuel Viscosity and Engine Performance | Aktar | IJMCA
(Click on the PDF download near the bottom)

I'd be interested in any informed comments on their testing methods and conclusions.
There doesn't seem to be any discussion of their methods.
It looks like they ran one series of tests on each engine, diesel on a dyno, and a motorbike on a track. Seems like there are a vast number of uncontrolled and unmentioned variables that could be important. I'd like to see many more tests run in an arbitrary order. Maybe the diesel engine was stared cold, and as it came up to operating temperature it's efficiency improved? Each diesel test took between 77 seconds and 105 seconds. Which seems like a rather short run to get the reported precision.
This:
"The diesel consumption decreases till 4000 gauss and deteriorates beyond 4000 gauss... This could be due to other effects coming in picture post 4000 gauss field viz. viscous heating on the fuel on account of very high magentic filed strength." Is pure BS.

-mort
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mort For This Useful Post:
jakobnev (05-29-2015)
Old 06-09-2014, 03:52 AM   #476 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The site also has HHO: Search Results

I suppose if I looked around in there some more I'd come across the Ram Implosion Wing.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 09:44 AM   #477 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
Quote:
If a field is introduced perpendicular to that circuit, according to Faraday`s law, there will be an electro-motive-force acting on the electron. The EMF has the effect of changing the nature of the circulating motion of atomic orbits.
As a result of this field the electron will be accelerated according to Newton`s Law.
How do I magnetize my tin foil hat?!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 10:48 AM   #478 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts




  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 02:23 PM   #479 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.O.G. View Post
Here's a paper that seems to be supporting fuel magnets.

Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on Hydrocarbon Fuel Viscosity and Engine Performance | Aktar | IJMCA
(Click on the PDF download near the bottom)

I'd be interested in any informed comments on their testing methods and conclusions.
I got as far as Declustering of the Hydrocarbon fuel molecules in the second sentence of the abstract. UNICORN!
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2014, 10:19 PM   #480 (permalink)
Wanting more for less
 
D.O.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313

Metric - '94 Honda Magna 250
Motorcycle
90 day: 69.83 mpg (US)

RedCelica - '94 Toyota Celica ZR
90 day: 35.97 mpg (US)

i30 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)

i30-22 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort View Post
There doesn't seem to be any discussion of their methods.
It looks like they ran one series of tests on each engine, diesel on a dyno, and a motorbike on a track. Seems like there are a vast number of uncontrolled and unmentioned variables that could be important. I'd like to see many more tests run in an arbitrary order. Maybe the diesel engine was stared cold, and as it came up to operating temperature it's efficiency improved? Each diesel test took between 77 seconds and 105 seconds. Which seems like a rather short run to get the reported precision.
This:
"The diesel consumption decreases till 4000 gauss and deteriorates beyond 4000 gauss... This could be due to other effects coming in picture post 4000 gauss field viz. viscous heating on the fuel on account of very high magentic filed strength." Is pure BS.

-mort
I agree that their "real world" testing is so loose that you can't rely on it.

I was intrigued by the viscosity test though.
I don't know if that really relates to decreased fuel consumption, but it indicates that magnets can have some sort of affect on fuel.

__________________



  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Magnetic engine returns BillWhedon The Unicorn Corral 22 03-13-2013 04:09 AM
Uk ford transit, economy increase? chipX EcoModding Central 14 10-11-2012 03:38 AM
Magnets (as attachment method) jmonroe Aerodynamics 10 03-07-2009 02:12 AM
New Report of 20% milage increase by reducing viscosity of fuel htaylor EcoModding Central 29 01-27-2009 01:35 AM
magnets use for permanent mods ? groar EcoModding Central 5 09-08-2008 04:52 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com