Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-09-2012, 10:10 PM   #111 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Are you psychic?

How do you know my car will flip "given the right tires?"

I changed the RC height in front and back. I changed the spring attachment points. I did not use the stock suspension upper attachment points.

How the hell should I know the rest? The car isn't done yet.

So we agree you haven't driven a similar car. You have never built any car. You don't have a clue as to what I am doing.

But you offer your opinion.



I don't want your opinion.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-10-2012, 10:06 AM   #112 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
1) Physics. Rollover is basically just a calculation of CG, cornering force, and track width. Given enough tire to generate enough cornering force, any car will roll. That said, it may be an incorrect statement. Even though this will be very prone to lifting the inside tire off the ground, the single rear wheel may not have enough grip to generate that kind of force anyway.

2) How did you change the RC in the rear? With a single rear wheel, the roll center is where the tire contacts the ground.

You really need to lighten up. This is a public forum. Myself and others have only offered constructive criticism. There no need to act so offended and childish.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 10:28 AM   #113 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The simple fact that it's a trike and has bodywork gives it a tremendous leg up on safety vs a motorcycle or bicycle, which most of us will ride without giving it a second thought. All this isht about cornering, rolling, and getting smacked- good God, the cure for most of that is to not drive like an idiot.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 07:10 PM   #114 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
Reading through this thread, I begin to understand why New Jersey paid Paul Van Valkenburgh actual money to run experiments on trike stability. On 4-wheelers, we commonly tune cars for understeer or oversteer by fairly small changes in the anti-roll bars, to increase weight transfer at the stickier end and get neutral handling. A trike eliminates all weight transfer at one end, so the other end always slides first, unless everything else has been radically compromised. Camber is a relatively minor issue in this debate, although it can be very important with some tires.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 07:14 PM   #115 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
Negative. The car does lean the opposite way, however it would still be sitting right on grippy tread, as opposed to the sidewall of a square car tire.
Good point, it will still be on a treaded section of tire that is intended to be driven on. The rear will still want to "step out", I think, because of the camber thrust toward the outside of the corner.

It could very well be a non-issue, or not enough of an issue to matter. Real world results trump theory. But keep in mind the possibility that the handling could be really wicked. Perhaps testing at an autoX would be in order?

Good luck with the build, it looks very cool! I hope you hit your MPG target, as well. It'll be great to see what you get out of it when it is on the road.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 08:04 PM   #116 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
1) Physics. Rollover is basically just a calculation of CG, cornering force, and track width. Given enough tire to generate enough cornering force, any car will roll. That said, it may be an incorrect statement. Even though this will be very prone to lifting the inside tire off the ground, the single rear wheel may not have enough grip to generate that kind of force anyway.

2) How did you change the RC in the rear? With a single rear wheel, the roll center is where the tire contacts the ground.

You really need to lighten up. This is a public forum. Myself and others have only offered constructive criticism. There no need to act so offended and childish.

You are an idiot. I bet you are an engineer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 08:06 PM   #117 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
A trike eliminates all weight transfer at one end, so the other end always slides first, .
This statement is patently untrue.

If you want to ask questions, I'm more likely to help you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 10:12 PM   #118 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
I bet you are an engineer.
Yes.

Perhaps you should go back to your first post in this thread and correct your statement...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
I invite discussion, argument, and ideas
Or perhaps you could have a civil discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
If you want to ask questions, I'm more likely to help you.
Why not answer my question?
How did you change the rear roll center on a single wheel?
How are you achieving weight transfer with only one wheel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
Perhaps testing at an autoX would be in order?
This would be my approach... but given the rollover guidelines in section 3.1 of the SCCA rules, I find it very unlikely it would be allowed on course - it would be at the extreme rollover end of the "SSF" chart. Actually its off the chart. (http://scca.cdn.racersites.com/prod/...lo%20Rules.pdf) You'd have to make your own private test course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 10:37 PM   #119 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
How did you change the rear roll center on a single wheel?

the donor car had an RC higher then it has now. The front suspension of the donor car had an RC different then it does now. Hence, it has changed.


How are you achieving weight transfer with only one wheel?

When you go around a corner, weight transfers from the inside front tire to the outside front tire and the back tire.
You do know what a tire is?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 10:39 PM   #120 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
>>>Perhaps you should go back to your first post in this thread and correct your statement...

Done.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com