09-27-2020, 10:16 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Arson, negligence with fire and ignition sources, over enthusiasm for fighting forest fires, no enthusiasm for forestry.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 03:14 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 406
Thanks: 35
Thanked 143 Times in 105 Posts
|
Yes it would be helpful if the federal government would maintain the almost 60% of the forests they own in California.
"More than 1.1 million acres have burned on federal lands in California this year, compared to 769,032 acres on non-federally managed lands, according to figures collected by the National Interagency Fire Center. ... "
These numbers have increased of course in the past couple weeks since this report was published.
JJ
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jjackstone For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-29-2020, 04:07 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,644
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPG Undercover
I commend California for its attempt in forcasting the end of the 1850s technology (the internal combustion engine) which has been passed on to us as "modern technology" for much too long now.
What the automakers and the big oil companies have done to humanity is criminal, both in terms of the pollution and the inefficient technology that they have made even more inefficient, through sabotage.
I'm sorry if this sounds extreme or off the wall to some, but it is the truth.
Did you know, for example, that under the BEST maintenance conditions, the average gasoline powered vehicle uses, at most, about 33% of the gasoline that you put into the gas tank to actually move the vehicle forward, and that the other 66% or so is burned in the catalytic converter, and comes out of the tailpipe?
It is actually pathetic when you consider the fact that in the year 2020 we are still talking about carbon build-up in an engine. For that we may as well be driving with a bag of coal in the trunk!
|
.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 04:36 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Battery powered cars are just natural gas powered, nuclear and coal powered cars.
The rankine cycle used by nearly all power plants predates the internal combustion engine by a lot. But that's nothing compared to wind and hydro power.
Wind power is like 9th century tech. Water power is roman tech.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 09-29-2020 at 04:52 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-29-2020, 04:57 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,743
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
Well I didn't mean to run off the new contributor. Was hoping for a thoughtful retort.
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 04:58 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,528
Thanks: 8,077
Thanked 8,871 Times in 7,323 Posts
|
oil pan 4 — Woody Guthrie might disagree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Coulee_Dam_(song).
Hey, I learned it was cover by Lonnie Donegan. Further research is required*.
jjackstone — Who is the controlling authority? BLM (no pun)?
jakobnev — IsN't ThAt A voiCe oF sElf-mOcKerY?
Quote:
Well I didn't mean to run off the new contributor. Was hoping for a thoughtful retort.
|
Dang, I've been deleting email notifications en mass. Now I'll never know what happened.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-29-2020, 07:18 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas Fort Worth
Posts: 259
Thanks: 223
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
|
California Nut Coast Left Coast West Coast 2035 ICE Ban
California authority from Governor ,Legislature and down are pathetic. Currently no OEM production EV has a range beyond 250miles without ranger extender or non-oem modification ...Rural California citizens will be jacked when 2035 arrives especially farms and construction ....Highly likely border states and Mexico vehicle traffic will violate 2035 ICE Ban ( another unenforced law)/Even with future technologies I see the ICE around for next 50 years easy.
California can not even manage their current perils like wild forest fires even with fire professionals from Texas and other states. California has had wild fires out of control for 30 years plus. You would have though back in 2018 2019 years state and federal authorties (worthless judges) would have realized the need to thin forests and have fire breaks. California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Colorado all have pathetic forest management and therein create random tinder box which either a meth head (Oregon) or fireworks (California) citizens that start the tinder box.
California governor Newsom , Oregon governor Brown and state fire marshall are pathetic and worthless.
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 07:48 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasCotton
Currently no OEM production EV has a range beyond 250miles without ranger extender or non-oem modification
|
Range:
402 miles - Model S Long Range
330 miles - Model 3 Long Range
328 miles - Model X Long Range
316 miles - Model Y Long Range AWD
That is today - no doubt the technology will improve in 15 years
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 10:47 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,372
Thanks: 324
Thanked 483 Times in 368 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasCotton
...Rural California citizens will be jacked when 2035 arrives especially farms and construction ....
|
As far as I could tell this applied to licensed road vehicles, not off road vehicles. That would be a whole 'nother situation. Imagine an all electric John Deere 8-wheeler.
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)
2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
|
|
|
09-29-2020, 11:34 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
The model S long range and it's 100kwh battery capacity, 400 miles is very optimistic and impossible in cold conditions. Unless you drive at 50mph.
I suspect severe range anxiety to kick in about 250 to 300 miles.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|