Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2008, 01:09 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Politics.

Everybody MUST buy a brand new car or you will die.

At least that's what I read.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-03-2008, 02:04 PM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 284

Parachute - '03 Chevrolet Tracker LX
90 day: 28.55 mpg (US)

Peon - '95 Plymouth Neon Highline baby!
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)

Slocus Wagon - '06 Ford Focus SE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro View Post
Politics.

Everybody MUST buy a brand new car or you will die.

At least that's what I read.
Well that's what the manufacturers want you to believe anyways!

It's all about managing risk, or for some people, pretending that you can't get hurt or killed in a car. With a little older car you can't really fool yourself that you're invincible. Very scary!

I run chainsaws, fall trees, heat with wood, drink raw milk, eat raw fish, cook my steak rare, snowboard, mountain bike, boot around on my motocross bike, snowmobile on ice, hunt with firearms, and drive an old unsafe Neon to work everyday.

I guess if I did all those things in a risky way I'd probably be dead already! But I don't and hopefully I'll be here for a while to come!

Really we should drive our death traps like a motorcycle rider and try very hard to avoid the collision to begin with by paying attention to what's going on.
Ian
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 02:43 PM   #53 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
I've got something to add about roll bars and HANS deices...

It's very true you DON"T want a roll bar in your car unless your 'melon is inside a brain-bucket'. Or invent a better roll bar hidden behind something compliant (available roll bar padding doesn't make it, BTW). In order to help the passenger, you need to absorb any impact over a greater time-space and over the largest area possible (think about the waterballon toss winner's technique at the church picnic).

Maybe the driver and passengers need to dawn an individual air-bag suit. Slip on these coveralls, plug this connector into the car's safety port. You could taylor one for the individual. Close your eyes for a minute and imagine an accident victim looking like the Michelin Man 20ns into a crash

I attended a safety seminar put on by GM at a race a few years ago, the engineer was gushing about the HANS device (and rightfully so). He showed a specially made ultra-high frame per second video of a NASCAR driver experiencing a minor side hit. When they slowed it down and decontructed the footage frame by farme, the driver's neck must have stretched 6" in the incident!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 02:45 PM   #54 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyIan View Post
It's all about managing risk, or for some people, pretending that you can't get hurt or killed in a car. With a little older car you can't really fool yourself that you're invincible. Very scary!
Yup, it's about managing risk. If my commute were straight freeway driving, I'd have no problem in an older car. In my case, however, I have 17 miles of winding uphill/downhill undivided mountain roads. I deal with black ice and snow in the winter, and flatlanders who can't control their cars and spin or swing wide into my lanes year-round. Then I have three intersections where morons run the red at 60+ mph all the time--even though there are cameras at two of them. In my '90 Honda Accord with no airbags, I'm taking on an unnecessary risk, and with a family to support, even moreso than when I was single.

I'm certainly not going to fall for the "you MUST have a giant SUV to be safe" argument (and seeing the head-ons that happen on that mountain, the SUV driver dies just as often as the other guy), but $11k is not out of line for a new 37 mpg rated subcompact made with better materials and methods than in 1990, with front and side airbags and ABS. And since I'd buy new, I'll KNOW it had all of its maintenance done, was broken in properly and will probably last 200,000+ miles.

Again, depends on your situation.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 03:21 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
If it all comes down to cautious driving, why have car makers put so much effort into airbags, brakes, ABS, structural rigidity, stability control, seat belt pretensioners, etc in the last 15 years?
Because drivers aren't safe/cautious as a whole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
I absolutely agree that driving habits are extremely important to over all safety. But even the safest driver won't be able to avoid every accident. While amount of driving has increased by every possible metric over the last 15 years, the fatality rate per number of miles driven, total population, number of vehicles registered and number of drivers has decrease dramatically.
FARS Encyclopedia
Are we supposed to believe that drivers today are that much more cautious and all the technological advancements were a waste of time? I don't think so.
No, and I never maintained that drivers today are safer. What I did say is that compared to the safest car out there w/ an average driver, the safest driver with an average car will still be safer. The safest thing to do is not get in an accident. It's the same reason why fatalitiy rates for drivers who have accidents more often are ~4-5 times higher in crashes with semis than they are in the same crashes with safe drivers. In other words, bad drivers who tend to cause accidents, regardless of how safe their car is, should stay away from larger vehicles.

Furthemore, while the safest driver can't avoid every accident, by definition then tend to avoid them especially the life threatening ones, as such it's safer to drive safetly than it is to have a newer/safer car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 01:00 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Suppose we revisit that "deathtrap" claim. According to statistics here: The Odds of Dying | LiveScience the chance of dying as the result of an automobile accident is about 1 in 100. (That is, of all deaths, about 1% will be from auto accidents.) The linked FARS statistics show that all the automobile safety improvements (and other factors such as better roads & medical care) have decreased that only marginally in the 15 years shown.

Seems to me that calling any car a "deathtrap" is a great exaggeration, especially when you stop to reflect on how much the death rates from more common causes like cancer, stroke, and heart disease are increased by voluntary behavioral choices. In other words, if you're really interested in reducing your chance of premature death, forget about the car and invest your energy in things like quitting smoking, exercising more, and losing some weight :-)

Last edited by jamesqf; 10-04-2008 at 01:10 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 01:18 AM   #57 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
ugh. sounds like work. i want my car to do it all for me.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 06:13 AM   #58 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,521

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,077
Thanked 6,965 Times in 3,606 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
invest your energy in things like quitting smoking, exercising more, and losing some weight :-)
I'm with Frank. Can I get those at a drive through somewhere?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 08:52 AM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
quitting smoking
Check

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
exercising more
Check

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
losing some weight
In my case, that would not be healthy.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 09:09 AM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 451

Wicked Wanda - '99 VW Beetle GLS
90 day: 29.59 mpg (US)

Green Monster - '99 Ford Explorer Sport
90 day: 16.73 mpg (US)

Dad's Taxi - '99 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 24.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I'm with Frank. Can I get those at a drive through somewhere?
You want fries with that?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SuperMID - Fuel Economy Display SVOboy Instrumentation 25 05-15-2015 09:16 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 19 08-08-2010 09:24 PM
Pulse and Glide Fuel Economy Calculator 4 valve / Cylinder newtonsfirstlaw DIY / How-to 25 11-04-2008 03:32 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com