Earth's Albedo-Flip greenhouse amplification

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

I wasn't talking about the Maunder-Minimum or the little ice age. I have no idea why even bring that up unless you need a strawman, which you usually do.

1) You talked about the 'year without a summer.'
2) That occurred in 1815.
3) I have no record of any similar event occurring in the time-frame you mentioned.
4) If you have some evidence to support your assertion, it would be a good time to share that.
5) Us liars want to know!

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

So it's false advertising.

1) If an ice cube lasts for 18,000-years you can say it was 'stable', just as the glaciologist who said it.
2) Adding to it does not 'destabilize' it.
3) The fact that it's gone, at a time when Earth would be entering a new ice-age, is of concern to glaciologists and all who study the cryosphere.
4) I don't use 'true' or 'false', only 'fact.'
5) In that context, what I said was 100% factual.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

If you don't have anything nice to say, don't just say anything at all.

1) I've been 'looking' since 1976.
2) The only citation for the 'year without a summer' is attributed to 1815.
3) Not the timeframe mentioned by oil pan 4.
4) He's often quick to invoke 'BS' and 'liar' in his famous dismissive tone.
5) There's an implication that he's in possession of some peer-reviewed data.
6) It would be a simple matter to just 'expand' on his comment, share the source for the information, and then we could all vet it for ourselves and say 'thank you.'
7) It's my responsibility to flag the cognitive dissonance, a hallmark of climate deniers.
8) 'Nice' is a subjective term.( 'Please leave your clothes and shoes in an orderly pile, so you may easily locate them after your bath and inhalation')

[freebeard]

Originally Posted by redpoit5

There's no way the glaciers didn't see massive growth in 536 through 541ad when the earth had 2 years of winter and a year without summer.

Originally Posted by aerohead

1) You talked about the 'year without a summer.'
2) That occurred in 1815.
3) I have no record of any similar event occurring in the time-frame you mentioned.
...
]2) The only citation for the 'year without a summer' is attributed to 1815.
3) Not the timeframe mentioned by oil pan 4.

also aerohead

I can't read it for you.
I can't comprehend it for you.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=worst+year+in+history&ia=web

1815 doesn't even make the first page results.

[freebeard]

Originally Posted by aerohead

8) 'Nice' is a subjective term.( 'Please leave your clothes and shoes in an orderly pile, so you may easily locate them after your bath and inhalation')

WTF. It's an aphorism!

edit:

a year without a summer
vs
the year without a summer

What a difference an article makes, amIrite?

[redpoint5]

I didn't say that.

Also, this is the thread I meant to say is non-sequitur, but then again that applies to the many threads on this subject.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

also aerohead


https://duckduckgo.com/?q=worst+year+in+history&ia=web

1815 doesn't even make the first page results.

How about a search for 'the year without a summer.'
That's the topic of discussion.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

WTF. It's an aphorism!

edit:

a year without a summer
vs
the year without a summer

What a difference an article makes, amIrite?

oil pan 4 volunteered nothing of specificity with which to work with.
I did the best I could with the limited information. Every text I have on global warming cites 1815 as 'the year without a summer.'
It's a challenge to remain civil.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by redpoint5

I didn't say that.

Also, this is the thread I meant to say is non-sequitur, but then again that applies to the many threads on this subject.

1) Didn't say what?
2) You provide no trail of crumbs back to origin of your narrative.
3) Are you the original author of ' 536 through 541 ad' ?
oil pan 4 used it as if it were his data.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by aerohead

1) Didn't say what?
2) You provide no trail of crumbs back to origin of your narrative.
3) Are you the original author of ' 536 through 541 ad' ?
oil pan 4 used it as if it were his data.

1#
"Originally Posted by redpoit5
There's no way the glaciers didn't see massive growth in 536 through 541ad when the earth had 2 years of winter and a year without summer."