09-05-2014, 01:47 PM
|
#621 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
This is the USA - what is the typical ratio of manual-to-automatic shift cars are typically sold?
|
I've read: about 7% in 2012. In the US.
But also seen as low as ~4%
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-05-2014, 01:52 PM
|
#622 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
So, even if Elio sells 10-15% manual shift cars, they can subsidize the loss leader price fairly easily.
|
|
|
09-05-2014, 07:12 PM
|
#623 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Because of what happened to Preston Tucker?
|
Please read "In Search of Stupidity" to understand why this example is so wrong.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
09-05-2014, 07:13 PM
|
#624 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
So, even if Elio sells 10-15% manual shift cars, they can subsidize the loss leader price fairly easily.
|
Care to share the model you base this on ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
09-06-2014, 07:28 AM
|
#625 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Unless they put in an inefficient "sporty" manual transmission and an automatic with the gears that the manual should have, I just wonder who would say "Only 14.7% more for two percent less work? Why do they even offer the manual?"
What kind of MPG difference would you expect Elio manual versus automatic?
|
|
|
09-06-2014, 07:47 PM
|
#626 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Elio knows their costs. I do not. All I am saying is they have not told us what the auto will add to the price, so they can use some of that premium to cover their losses on the manual, if there is any.
A huge number of American drivers cannot even drive a manual, and many others who can, but do not want to.
|
|
|
09-07-2014, 02:25 AM
|
#627 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 142
Thanks: 6
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
|
Reinventing the wheel (or engine) seems a dumb move to me. Designing and building an engine manufacturing plant will add a huge amount of time and money to the start-up costs. If a major auto manufacturer is willing to sell them engines at a reasonable price I can't imagine how they wouldn't save money in the short run, and not going broke in the first year or two is definitely short run.
They wouldn't even need to go to an automotive engine manufacturer. There must be companies that make heavy equipment, tractor or other engines that would have the infrastructure and knowledge to build an engine to spec. And there are probably a number of smaller international firms -- Seat, Kia, Tata, etc that would be thrilled to get a hefty order.
Buying-in an existing motor that has already gone through all the EPA/EU certification process has got to save a huge amount of time and money.
cheers,
Michael
|
|
|
09-07-2014, 02:43 AM
|
#628 (permalink)
|
Growin a stash
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 815
Thanks: 416
Thanked 309 Times in 232 Posts
|
How many suppliers could build 50k+ engines a year for them? Not very many, I think. I know they intended to use a Metro engine originally, but there wasn't enough production capacity... so they would have to build new tooling from scratch.
Since they had to produce new tooling anyway, they decided to go ahead and build a specialized engine. Smart move, in my opinion-- but the delay really sucks. I want my Elio now.
__________________
2024 Chevy Bolt
Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ME_Andy For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-07-2014, 05:40 AM
|
#629 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Surely the best smart move would be to design the car to be flexible enough to use different engines - that way you could start with a Metro unit, or a Mitsubishi, Toyota etc. engine. Then when newer units come along - e.g. the 1.1 Kia Diesel or maybe a FIAT Twin Air - those could be used too. Also as an owner if it breaks you could pick up parts for one of those units quite easily to fix it. Unless the Elio volumes are really going to be very high you aren't likely to find specialist bits for them so easily, or cheaply.
Morgan has been around for 104 years and hasn't made their own engine at all. Their cars cost 3-4 times as much as these Elio things too.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
09-07-2014, 09:52 AM
|
#630 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
I hope we see the P5 soon, so we can discuss tangible things. And I hope they name their vehicle, too.
|
|
|
|