Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2013, 09:18 AM   #111 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Frank, I think there is a lot of sense in using cast iron. My ancient tech 97 Ranger with a cast iron block and head does very well for mileage, with only two valves per cylinder.

In the ecoboost.

Exhaust manifold integral with cylinder head, impossible with aluminum. Significantly faster warm up times, less complexity and no potential manifold gasket failure.

Iron absorbs heat much more slowly than aluminum and iron blocks and heads have basically identical expansion characteristics, with much less stress on the head gasket.

Maybe in a future design they will go back 60+ years and eliminate the head gasket altogether.

The weight penalty, vs AL, is not as great with precision thin wall iron casting controlled by computers. The 3 cyl ecoboost engine block is about the same size as a sheet of typewriter paper.

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-14-2013, 01:17 PM   #112 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Exhaust manifold integral with cylinder head, impossible with aluminum.
Mech
The 1.0L Ecoboost cylinder head is aluminum.


Integrating the exhaust manifold into an aluminum cylinder head is certainly not impossible. Its been done on many modern engines.


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tjts1 For This Useful Post:
Allch Chcar (08-15-2013), serialk11r (08-15-2013)
Old 08-14-2013, 02:20 PM   #113 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Funny I read somewhere that the head was cast iron. Thanks for the update.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 07:18 PM   #114 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Funny I read somewhere that the head was cast iron. Thanks for the update.

regards
Mech
This is a good shot of the intake side where you can see the contrast between the iron block and alloy head. I think the weirdest thing about this engine is the timing BELT which travels through the engine oil.


Exhaust side.

Last edited by tjts1; 08-14-2013 at 07:24 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 12:29 AM   #115 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,628 Times in 1,453 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
I think the weirdest thing about this engine is the timing BELT which travels through the engine oil.
I'll have to second that, it's really an odd setup.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 12:38 AM   #116 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Honda has been running timing belts through the crankcase of small stationary engines for years.



Quote:
LIFETIME TIMING BELT DESIGN
GC series, GS series
Honda’s GC and GS engines use the world’s first small engine internal timing belt, designed to last the lifetime of the engine.

Small engine timing belts are usually external and are subject to wear caused by dirt. Honda’s internal timing belt runs in oil, eliminating the need for conventional drive gears.

This design:

Improves lubrication,
Reduces the weight of the engine, and
Provides quieter operation.
http://engines.honda.com/why/technology
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 08-15-2013 at 12:48 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 11:50 AM   #117 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Yeah, but thats got Honda reliability. When ford says "lifetime timing belt" its the lifetime of the belt which dictates the lifetime of the engine, not the other way around. It doesn't look like it was designed to ever be changed. We'll see how this plays out when these engines hit the 100k mile mark.

I do like the fact that the 1.0L Ecoboost is only available with a manual transmission in the US.

Last edited by tjts1; 08-15-2013 at 11:55 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 01:24 PM   #118 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
I do like the fact that the 1.0L Ecoboost is only available with a manual transmission in the US.
How is it geared? "Normal people" claim that automatics are more efficient nowadays.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 01:34 PM   #119 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
How is it geared? "Normal people" claim that automatics are more efficient nowadays.
No clue. They didn't put a dual clutch on it because too much NVH. And yes, modern automatics are more efficient for normal drivers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013, 01:52 PM   #120 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
justme1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ff
Posts: 459
Thanks: 59
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
Ya just never know!

The early answer will likely be wrong and under informed. it is sound logic to boost HP. because you dont have to use it. If you do have to use it, and dont have enough the result is a plymouth Arrow capable of good mileage in its day but driven like a 70s sports compact. It sucked, and sucked gas to boot because it was built to appease fuel constraints so thier full line mpg avg could score higher.
Ill take all the power ya have and use it intelligently, Again I point you to the Cadillac engines, and Big mercedes hybrid diesels. The shoe must fit I can wear something 2 sizes too big but cannot fit 1/2 sized too small.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com