08-14-2013, 10:18 AM
|
#111 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Frank, I think there is a lot of sense in using cast iron. My ancient tech 97 Ranger with a cast iron block and head does very well for mileage, with only two valves per cylinder.
In the ecoboost.
Exhaust manifold integral with cylinder head, impossible with aluminum. Significantly faster warm up times, less complexity and no potential manifold gasket failure.
Iron absorbs heat much more slowly than aluminum and iron blocks and heads have basically identical expansion characteristics, with much less stress on the head gasket.
Maybe in a future design they will go back 60+ years and eliminate the head gasket altogether.
The weight penalty, vs AL, is not as great with precision thin wall iron casting controlled by computers. The 3 cyl ecoboost engine block is about the same size as a sheet of typewriter paper.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-14-2013, 02:17 PM
|
#112 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
Exhaust manifold integral with cylinder head, impossible with aluminum.
Mech
|
The 1.0L Ecoboost cylinder head is aluminum.
Integrating the exhaust manifold into an aluminum cylinder head is certainly not impossible. Its been done on many modern engines.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tjts1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-14-2013, 03:20 PM
|
#113 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Funny I read somewhere that the head was cast iron. Thanks for the update.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
08-14-2013, 08:18 PM
|
#114 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
Funny I read somewhere that the head was cast iron. Thanks for the update.
regards
Mech
|
This is a good shot of the intake side where you can see the contrast between the iron block and alloy head. I think the weirdest thing about this engine is the timing BELT which travels through the engine oil.
Exhaust side.
Last edited by tjts1; 08-14-2013 at 08:24 PM..
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 01:29 AM
|
#115 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
I think the weirdest thing about this engine is the timing BELT which travels through the engine oil.
|
I'll have to second that, it's really an odd setup.
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 01:38 AM
|
#116 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Honda has been running timing belts through the crankcase of small stationary engines for years.
Quote:
LIFETIME TIMING BELT DESIGN
GC series, GS series
Honda’s GC and GS engines use the world’s first small engine internal timing belt, designed to last the lifetime of the engine.
Small engine timing belts are usually external and are subject to wear caused by dirt. Honda’s internal timing belt runs in oil, eliminating the need for conventional drive gears.
This design:
Improves lubrication,
Reduces the weight of the engine, and
Provides quieter operation.
|
http://engines.honda.com/why/technology
Last edited by Frank Lee; 08-15-2013 at 01:48 AM..
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 12:50 PM
|
#117 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Yeah, but thats got Honda reliability. When ford says "lifetime timing belt" its the lifetime of the belt which dictates the lifetime of the engine, not the other way around. It doesn't look like it was designed to ever be changed. We'll see how this plays out when these engines hit the 100k mile mark.
I do like the fact that the 1.0L Ecoboost is only available with a manual transmission in the US.
Last edited by tjts1; 08-15-2013 at 12:55 PM..
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 02:24 PM
|
#118 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
I do like the fact that the 1.0L Ecoboost is only available with a manual transmission in the US.
|
How is it geared? "Normal people" claim that automatics are more efficient nowadays.
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 02:34 PM
|
#119 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
How is it geared? "Normal people" claim that automatics are more efficient nowadays.
|
No clue. They didn't put a dual clutch on it because too much NVH. And yes, modern automatics are more efficient for normal drivers.
|
|
|
08-15-2013, 02:52 PM
|
#120 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ff
Posts: 459
Thanks: 59
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
|
Ya just never know!
The early answer will likely be wrong and under informed. it is sound logic to boost HP. because you dont have to use it. If you do have to use it, and dont have enough the result is a plymouth Arrow capable of good mileage in its day but driven like a 70s sports compact. It sucked, and sucked gas to boot because it was built to appease fuel constraints so thier full line mpg avg could score higher.
Ill take all the power ya have and use it intelligently, Again I point you to the Cadillac engines, and Big mercedes hybrid diesels. The shoe must fit I can wear something 2 sizes too big but cannot fit 1/2 sized too small.
|
|
|
|