View Poll Results: 70 mph miles per gallon?
|
42
|
|
3 |
20.00% |
44
|
|
0 |
0% |
46
|
|
2 |
13.33% |
48
|
|
1 |
6.67% |
50
|
|
2 |
13.33% |
52
|
|
0 |
0% |
54
|
|
0 |
0% |
56
|
|
2 |
13.33% |
58
|
|
0 |
0% |
60+
|
|
5 |
33.33% |
12-29-2019, 09:34 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,094
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,568 Times in 1,592 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Amateurs.
I get around 120mpg at 70mph in the summer in the leaf.
To be a little more fair my wife's hybrid sonata gets around 40mpg, during the summer at 70mph.
|
Ahh, but what's your cost per gallon in the Leaf? And where does it come from?
In Vermont we're paying 17 cents per kwh. It's all from renewables so it's a cleaner option than gasoline, but it puts a "gallon" of electricity at around $5.70, 210% the price of regular gasoline.
Discounting maintenance, that places my 50mph K-Sight at a somewhere between the cost per mile of a Leaf's combined EPA rating and what you're seeing in practice. If you're getting your electricity from coal it's probably cheaper, but I'm betting it's also less clean.
Would I like to own an electric car? Heck yes. But I frequently drive back and forth to Michigan and the infrastructure isn't there yet for me to do it in an EV, and there aren't any cost savings to switching for local driving because I'm already in a pretty efficient vehicle. Plus this car can embarrass a Mustang GT or base Corvette on the drag strip.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-29-2019, 02:24 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
|
You think you can re register that thing as a non hybrid to avoid the ridiculous road tax? One of the states I'm looking at moving to charges $200. Arkansas even has $100 on the Prius. That and I can't even register the ranger at 25 years old as an antique anymore... It has to be 45 years old to be considered! WAT...
2019 has been a horrible year for my taste in vehicles.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
|
|
|
12-29-2019, 02:27 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
|
With that said I think I'm leaning towards either a 91 Civic Hatch or a 91 CRX for my next vehicle. I already own a 91 civic roller. Needs a lot of work. Can't decide between the civic for extra utility or the CRX because ultra lightweight no aero drag.
I've always wanted a ****box DD I can ding up and not care about, but also get like 50mpg highway at 70, and be fast as **** in gears 1-4.
CRX/Civic really fits the bill.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
|
|
|
12-29-2019, 08:20 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
An unimportant context on this particular forum. Perhaps makes sense elsewhere, though.
|
It’s the only way to sort weight carried from the vehicle itself.
Past payload, what’s the reference which matters? Two seats? Two-cylinder?
How does the MPG at 70 matter if there’s no common ground against which to judge?
If it can’t carry ones family + luggage, it’s not a car, it’s a joke fools play on themselves.
May as well ask how long a 650-mile trip takes. A current Mirage holds 9-gals. Refill at 80% at 40-mpg = 290/miles.
Means as I get 1/2 that number, but have 3X the fuel, I’ll roll past and arrive close to an hour ahead.
With a passenger & gear payload that requires 7-8 Mirage.
So, what’s the point of asking about MPG without a reference?
Taking the bus trumps all of them.
.
Last edited by slowmover; 12-29-2019 at 08:32 PM..
|
|
|
12-29-2019, 08:33 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,094
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,568 Times in 1,592 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
It’s the only way to sort weight carried from the vehicle itself.
Past payload, what’s the reference which matters? Two seats? Two-cylinder?
How does the MPG at 70 matter if there’s no common ground against which to judge?
If it can’t carry ones family + luggage, it’s not a car, it’s a joke fools play on themselves.
.
|
My family is two, and most of the time my car is carrying one. Do I get a bonus for having a small family?
I think perhaps the ultimate metric is total cost of ownership, applied across all vehicles needed to service a group of people. If you need a second car, your cost of ownership increases and it may not be saving you money. Get in a bad accident and get injured and that's a cost too. Die of boredom and that could be an additional cost. Some costs are subjective.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-30-2019, 12:24 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Base rate is 9 cents per kwh, total bill divided by use is usually around 10 to 11 cents per kwh.
NM has the cheapest non hydroelectric power in the nation.
So I pay about 2.5 cents a mile.
The bybrid is more like 5.7 cents per mile assuming I slow down a little and it gets 44mpg.
The infrastructure here didn't exist to drive my old leaf to the next town over and back so I built it.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 12-30-2019 at 01:51 AM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-01-2020, 12:05 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
73mpg at 70mph on I-26 in the summer.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to basjoos For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-01-2020, 08:02 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Ecomodding Englishman
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 156
Thanks: 98
Thanked 48 Times in 32 Posts
|
Weirdly, the Smart feels happiest in the 65-75mph rev range. Some quirk of the torque curve and gearing, I guess. Either way, at a disciplined 70 on a flattish motorway, warm weather, favourable traffic conditions, she does about 62-63 MPG imperial.
I never take much notice in the Volvo because Mrs Lemmy drives it too, and efficiency is of little interest to her so the peak figures aren't what they would be if it were driven solely by myself.
__________________
https://themediocrecyclist.home.blog
2004 Smart Fortwo 0.7 petrol.
Motorbike.
Many, many bicycles.
2019 Volvo XC90 T8 - 400BHP plug in hybrid insanity.
All journeys I do under 10 miles are human powered - I make journeys, not excuses..
2019 mileage - 1900 by car, 7100 by bicycle.
|
|
|
01-02-2020, 05:17 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513
2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US) 2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H 90 day: 17.08 mpg (US) 2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US) 2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US) 2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe 90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
|
about 26mpg at 75mph
about 34MPG at 40-45mph (EVT mode)
that is with a 6.0l engine
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tahoe_Hybrid For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-02-2020, 07:01 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,094
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,568 Times in 1,592 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid
about 26mpg at 75mph
about 34MPG at 40-45mph (EVT mode)
that is with a 6.0l engine
|
Pretty dang good. Would be neat to see that 6.0L hybrid drivetrain in something a little smaller.
|
|
|
|