Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2009, 04:39 PM   #81 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
So Nerys, what is wrong with your car that it cant burn e10 efficiently? It should be able to get the same mpg, minus the btu density change of %10 ethanol. Got a wideband sensor to troubleshoot it with?

__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-04-2009, 04:52 PM   #82 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I think some cars have a circuit that listens for driver rants about ethanol, which activates other circuits that cause all sorts of problems.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 04:55 PM   #83 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...it's a two-seater all-electric concept car (ala' Tesla).

...go to the Audi AG website and look for e-tron

...I only snatched their design sketch, there's a purdy red one shown.

Last edited by gone-ot; 10-04-2009 at 05:04 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 05:14 PM   #84 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 204
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Hmm. So based on my personal research and opinions which I'm sure may not be the same as others....

1. Most Ethanol is not being made in the US. A significant amount is being snuck in under NAFTA through Mexico from Brazil where they are still decimating the rain forest to grow cane to make the fuel. Many of the US ethanol plant

2. The reason you can't buy 100% ethanol in most places is because by adding the gasoline content only oil company resources may transport it or sell it without lots of overhead for "hazmat" or carrier charges...

3. It takes 1.3 units of Crude oil in the current system to manufacture 1 unit of ethanol.
(This includes all the fertilizer and power being used in current bulk process ethanol refining.)

4. There is a surplus of crude oil right now in the market, and a shortage of refineries supply and demand is a son of a gun to fight... The first refinery in nearly 20 years is being built in North Dakota... To use the Canadian crude oil.

5. There is not a single battery technology in the market that does not actually use more energy to make than they save. This includes the high expensive and exotic processes to make the various lithium tech batteries then recycle them. They cost more to recycle than produce when you follow them to the end of their life, right now most go into landfills (In china who also manufactures all most all the hybrid vehicle batteries). Battery tech is still the limiter on a viable long term plug-in based auto technology, as much as I'd love to have one for my commute.

At the end of the day I think the key is simple economy and diversification of power sources. I'm not expecting 1 technology to replace standard internal combustion engines, rather a suite of solutions that each take a bite. For lower mile drivers a plug in solution would work now because they would get great life expectancy out of the battery packs (With good chargers not the lame ones in use in most systems now) simply because they don't wear out the batteries as fast deep discharging them.

On the other hand the higher mile driver, a LNG vehicle is way better because of the beating they give the cars.

For very small neighborhood or inner city vehicles the Hydrogen option is awesome for its lower pollution levels but higher cost to build and increased perceived handling issues.
(Hydrogen is actually WAY safer than natural gas.)

BTW on 100 octane unleaded race gas my Jeep Wrangler 4 cyl gets 22mpg, on E10 it gets 15, On E85 it gets 10 the computer is just too stupid to handle the AFR of alcohol, I've played a lot with it..l.

Race gas does not contain VOC limiters, it mostly does have 7 to 10 % alcohol as an oxygenation additive to replace the MTBE which is pretty much banned now. Without the VOC limiters it just vaporizes WAYYY better and burns better. Dump a 1/4 cup of Sunoco Race Gas on the ground and its gone in seconds pump gas almost doesn't evaporate.

In Oregon in rural areas we can by non alcohol fuel for "farm" use.
When I use it I immediately get 40 more miles on a 18 gallon tank of fuel its not a small hard to measure thing. (I have some test strips that I got from a local chem supplier to detect alcohol to double check.)

Oh well just thinking out loud.

Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 05:18 PM   #85 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...you can still find Sunoco 260 "Race Gas" these days? Where?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 07:24 PM   #86 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
It wins for me. I should calculate how much money I've saved.
It wins for you, but not from a pure economic standpoint. You're effectively getting welfare checks. Not that I would refuse them, were they offered to me! My STi would llllooovvveee some nice, cheap E85.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 07:29 PM   #87 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Do you want to examine the govt subsidies for oil and include that in the calculations? I hope so.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 09:20 PM   #88 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 204
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...you can still find Sunoco 260 "Race Gas" these days? Where?
I work at a race shop as my weekend sanity job to get me away from computers we used to sell Sunoco but now we sell another brand,
cheaper and works just as good for road racing, and I am suddenly at a complete brain fade on the brand name.... Arrrrrg.

Most of what we sell is Leaded 110 octane or 104 Unleaded.
I think the 260 got dropped casue it depended on MTBE and Sunoco
had to quit using it..

Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 12:14 AM   #89 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
5. There is not a single battery technology in the market that does not actually use more energy to make than they save. This includes the high expensive and exotic processes to make the various lithium tech batteries then recycle them. They cost more to recycle than produce when you follow them to the end of their life, right now most go into landfills (In china who also manufactures all most all the hybrid vehicle batteries). Battery tech is still the limiter on a viable long term plug-in based auto technology, as much as I'd love to have one for my commute.

This is poppy cock.

An E95 nimh battery costs $4500 FULL RETAIL. its good for 250,000 miles to 80% so designed RIGHT in the right car should last the average person AT LEAST 350,000 miles OR MORE or 25-30 years minimum before you have to replace it.

THis data is coroberated by testing on RAV4EV E95 packs with over 150,000 miles on the battery (ZERO degradation in 10 years and 150,000 miles so far)

There is no way in HELL this is not more back economically than was put into it.

Just no way in hell.

Consider the average today car is kept for 9 years. that means you would go through roughly 3-4 REGULAR CARS with all there hardware engines oils fluids and parts in the place of a SINGLE E95 powered aluminum and plastic car.

Where ever you got your data its totally fubar'd

On the EV side.

30 years time

1 Motor
1 Controller
1 Battery

The average Gasoline car

30 Years time

3 Engines
3 Transmissions
3 Fuel Systems
3 Exhaust Systems
3 Alternators
3 PS Pumps
3 of everything else in the engine
3 Emissions systems
60 Oil Changes
3 Radiators and all its fluids over 30 years

Plus misc other fluids over 30 years.

PLUS 3 WHOLE CARS and any drivetrain parts not in the EV they might need over 9 years each.

are you SERIOUSLY TELLING ME that ALL OF THAT is less "energy spent" than ONE SINGLE BATTERY PACK?

thats a joke right?

a SINGLE BATTERY PACK takes more energy than ALL OF THAT ?

thats not even counting the roughly 16,500 GALLONS OF GASOLINE you will burn in that time.

Your joking right?

Last edited by Nerys; 10-05-2009 at 12:20 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 12:22 AM   #90 (permalink)
Grrr :-)
 
Nerys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Posts: 800

Cherokee - '88 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 19.44 mpg (US)

Ryo-Ohki - '94 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 50.15 mpg (US)

Vger 2 - '00 Plymouth Grand Voyager SE

Ninja - '89 Geo Tracker
90 day: 30.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwtaylorpdx View Post
Most of what we sell is Leaded 110 octane or 104 Unleaded.
I think the 260 got dropped casue it depended on MTBE and Sunoco
had to quit using it..

Dave
Is the 104 unleaded with or without ethanol?

How much 104 unleaded would I need to mix with 84 unleaded to get 87-90 octane regular?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
free OBD2 software with MPG calc whitewiz Instrumentation 11 12-10-2014 10:53 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 11:59 AM
How to get instant fuel consumption from Megasquirt TELVM Instrumentation 11 08-29-2011 02:47 PM
The Ethanol Scam: Are ethanol advocates giving slanted mpg numbers? Ptero Fossil Fuel Free 15 04-22-2010 09:58 AM
The Ethanol Bubble Pops in Iowa hypermiler01 Fossil Fuel Free 13 04-18-2010 02:19 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com