Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2009, 12:13 PM   #61 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
So what about adding sheet metal fins to the hot side? To help cool it better?

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-07-2009, 02:18 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
So what about adding sheet metal fins to the hot side? To help cool it better?
That would definitely work, but that's essentially what the condenser is, a set of tubes with aluminum fins stuck to them to increase surface area a hundredfold.
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 05:01 PM   #63 (permalink)
Renaissance Man
 
Formula413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Northeast dreaming of the Southwest
Posts: 596

Aegean C - '17 Honda Civic LX
90 day: 39.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Great idea. I don't use A/C that much but I might do this anyway, probably only cost a few bucks for the insulation, right?

My dad has a '95 Escort wagon with the 1.9 and a stick. I guarantee you he is not getting anywhere near 40 mpg!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 09:03 PM   #64 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gascort View Post
That would definitely work, but that's essentially what the condenser is, a set of tubes with aluminum fins stuck to them to increase surface area a hundredfold.
Couldn't hurt, though?
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 12:42 AM   #65 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
agreed, but it would be much harder than insulating the cold (low pressure) side.
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 12:53 AM   #66 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gascort View Post
agreed, but it would be much harder than insulating the cold (low pressure) side.
Oh, I never suggest "in lieu of", rather "in companionship with."

IOW - Insulate the cold side as much as possible, then put fins on the hot side, as good measure, with some aluminum/tin scraps and bits of solder.

Frankly, a full-on Redo of the A/C system is probably in order on most cars, placing the bulk of the cold side lines inside the car so that they stay at the ambient temp of the inside of the vehicle, meaning that the system gets more efficient the longer it's on, by keeping the lines cold lines colder, thus cycling the pump less.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 07:53 AM   #67 (permalink)
Losing the MISinformation
 
Intrigued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern Missouri
Posts: 393

Quad Cam - '00 Oldsmobile Intrigue GX
Last 3: 25.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gascort View Post
...doing even better - haven't used enough fuel since the Kammback to reflect in my logs, but I don't think I've had a tank average under 44.4 mpg since installing it.
Kammback, you say??? I remember us talking about that at the "Meet in the Heat" in KC. Do you have a thread, or pics somewhere???
__________________


The brake pedal is my enemy. The brake pedal is my enemy. The brake pedal...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 10:21 PM   #68 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Dan, I can't believe you missed it!
Scientific Method meets Fuel Economy: Kammback

and the thread about it here:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...-mpg-9185.html

Did you miss my most recent mod too? We discussed it a bit in K.C. as well, with the battery and alternator discussion:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...roof-9549.html
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 10:44 PM   #69 (permalink)
Losing the MISinformation
 
Intrigued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern Missouri
Posts: 393

Quad Cam - '00 Oldsmobile Intrigue GX
Last 3: 25.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
COOL!!!! I like the "Scientific Method" bit...

I've been so busy with Drury University that I haven't been on here for a month or better. Just turned in the last Final paper yesterday...

I'm hoping to do some catching up!
__________________


The brake pedal is my enemy. The brake pedal is my enemy. The brake pedal...

Last edited by Intrigued; 08-08-2009 at 11:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2009, 12:55 PM   #70 (permalink)
College Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Over 44mpg is impressive. I'd like to get something above 35. Fortunately I hardly ever run my car at school so it's not as important. Adding sheet metal sounds interesting... a little overkill for me though.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List of aero mods you can do to your vehicle MetroMPG Aerodynamics 148 08-12-2021 10:53 PM
Experiment: smooth wheel discs tested A-B-A - 4.6% mpg improvement @ 65 mph Concrete Aerodynamics 318 01-19-2015 11:37 AM
Pulse&Glide, and aero mods, big mpg increase. Sulfuric Success Stories 3 01-15-2009 11:57 AM
2006 in review: mods vs. technique. And the winner is... MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 16 12-10-2007 07:46 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com