Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2011, 04:18 PM   #41 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
It was on the BBC and they like the idea of "right wing nutters" so they let it go out, and then had it as one of their news stories...

Back to middle America - if that is what this is about

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-27-2011, 01:12 PM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
OK, another Middle America story. My neighbor's kid - mid-20s, high-school grad, but just barely - moved back there (Iowa, I think, but most of it is much of a muchness to me) a couple of years ago, to get into an apprenticeship program for electric linemen. Spent a while putting up wind turbines, now apparently working on power lines. When he's on storm duty, which has been happening a lot lately, he gets paid close to $5K a week. Just bought a house, for IIRC about $40K, with payments under $300/month...
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 08:28 PM   #43 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoGogebic View Post
I really don't understand what going to the library has to do with anything. You can be the smartest person in the world, but that won't necessarily prevent you from losing your job. People just assume if someone loses their job they're lazy or stupid. I know it's hard for some of you to believe but the DOT states the average US driver only gets 17.2 mpg. So there are many people out there who are living on the edge when it comes to fuel mileage, and they are not all stupid and lazy. I guess my point was that we can argue all day long about the causes of high gas prices, but none of us can do anything about them. No one here is going to end fuel speculation or single handily create enough middle class jobs to save the country. The thing I have always admired about the people on this site is that they don't wait for the government to fix the problems, but they fix them themselves. I was just hoping that their would be a little more compassion for people like Mike who are new to the things many people have known here for a while. I think its up to us here to help them and create an easy way for them to get on board.

GoGogebic
This is whining. I'm lazy, Not my fault, Can't do anything about it The government won't help. This is known as "learned helplessness" a tawdry appeal worthy of Oprah. (Which makes it suspicious in and of itself, for who is attracted by this premise; to whom is it useful?; links below).

I was just hoping that their would be a little more compassion for people like Mike who are new to the things many people have known here for a while.

Why does this person need compassion? I would expect that would be for his friends and family. People like Mike, ignorant of the larger trends staring them in the face -- not hidden -- comprise what appears to be the majority of todays Americans. Consumers, not citizens. Until the bad habit of expecting others to do their work for them is ended (an educated citizenry), they'll find that life isn't about "answers", but about the questions. Ignorance does have a cure.

I think its up to us here to help them and create an easy way for them to get on board.

Why should this consensus exist?

How much easier, or cheaper, can a library card be? The Net may be good for initial digging on a topic, but there is no substitute for physical books. And never will be. Those who don't read are dependent on those who do. And are easily manipulated therein. This should be understood as -- throughout history -- that an easy way for them to get on board is for someone else to invent the frame, the problem and the solution for everyone else (to singular profit, be it money or power). Aren't you tired of that?

As this site is primarily about fuel economy (as I read it; FE being merely a subset of automobile ownership cost), one needs to understand, first, that fuel WILL rise in price. Second, that (due to a number of predictable and also unknown factors) availability WILL become problematic at some near point in time. It's happened here in America before. Little imagination needed.

How well will hypothetical Mike deal with this information? The five owners of the entire American media aren't going to help (unless one lives in Cartoon World), nay, the opposite as the past thirty-plus years demonstrate. The interest there is in keeping ignorance flourishing. Cui bono. "Forums" like these are useful as conditions decline . . taking the temperature of Joe Q. Public. Better he run neither cold nor hot en masse.

So in a very-near future where price and availability have become distinct yet interlocked problems, what else may occur? My $10/gl gasoline to which I am restricted to a few gallons weekly only allows me X-miles to travel (even assuming I have records of sufficient depth to make this assertion with accuracy).

I improve my average mpg for the vehicle I own (hopefully outright), and can predict how far I can travel based on this site. (Isn't that enough burden for the denizens of this forum? That hyper Mike learn to predict?)

As with learned helplessness, there is also unearned confidence lurking here due to prediction. (Another premise. Why should a consensus arise? How quickly is this site to become moribund due to "consensus"? Cui bono?)

None of us have driven in this world-to-come as it is hypothetical.

Just slowing down is not enough. Nor is combining trips. They take us most of the way . . but 300-mile trips to other cities via car no longer exists in our world (yours, mine, that of many) as commuting, groceries, utilities and debt service take nearly all of our income henceforth. Aero improvements may be entirely worthless for the majority . . they never hit 45-mph from hereon.

We've all heard: Plan for the worst, hope for the best.

As a result of using this site well I can accurately predict fuel use for given ends. Today.

Your hypothetical Mike is up against a wall in the new world. The Internet is prone -- increasingly -- to disinformation. What works to sway masses of people will be adjusted constantly. Lack of reading skill will definitely be hurtful, of not knowing how to separate the wheat from the chaff. (Don't trust that an e-book can't be changed after you buy it, it can and it will).

Let's take 1979 (or WWII) and extrapolate:

There will be plenty around here who, having achieved high mpg for their particular vehicle and use (have substantially cut their fuel bill and the rate of wear) will also be deeply surprised (unearned confidence) that what with cutbacks by municipalities and states on road repairs (none); what with bad weather increasing annually, and the other minor disasters that accumulate, that the roads themselves will deteriorate --bye-bye belly pan -- that what used to be stoplights are now (the temporary made permanent) stop signs and they can no longer glide along to those earlier high numbers.

- On every trip the car will be loaded to the gills with people or goods. (bye-bye grille block.)

- Every other driver will be trying -- unsuccessfully -- to achieve higher mpg; causing minor mayhem in every long stretch (and don't forget the bikes, the scooters, the lawnmowers out on the road).

- The lack of auto insurance by an increasing majority will make risking the family vehicle a huge problem . . there is not enough income to replace it (for more than half of Americans come that day) nor is there any longer coverage for uninsured motorists.

- Good luck even getting quality tires. Or shoes.

Is your hypothetical Mike prepared for this? I'd say that none of us are, but some are farther along the road than others. "Energy Independence" is the subject your man wants for learning. (Start with: not how to achieve it, but what it is. Depth of understanding).

I'll have some fun with Frank Lee: It is well-known that he has a Magic 8-Ball hood ornament that will attach to any of his five Fix-Or-Repair-Daily cars. He needs to know which of the clunkers can make it to the parts store that day to get the pieces to repair the one he really needs. I think he might have a couple thousand or so in purchase price spread across them all. Frank Lee has also stated that he lives below his means. Saving for that rainy day. Increasing his store of knowledge . . . now, me, I have one vehicle, a diesel, that I keep as nicely as can be. Study up on problems and fixes. One is enough, is my thinking. Can run on more than just retail fuel. But writing this today indicates to me that maybe Frank Lee can abandon any those old Fords and still go about his business unhindered. I can't. (I'm working on the alternates he already has).

The pleasure of this site -- and that is how it should be seen, IMO, as pleasurable -- is in trying to better a set of skills as well as vehicle performance. That others offer us examples is about the limit of what can be expected. It is up to us to do our own thinking (making choices).

If these also change our thinking about the problem of personal transportation, so much the better: What fossil fuel is available to us (that I can afford, not simply what is for sale) I can make the best use of. It's open-ended.

But understand that not even a 90-mpg car will fix the problems of needed mobility in this world-to-come. Higher mpg is only a stopgap. The larger picture is that the jobs may exist somewhere, but if I cannot get to them (another state, but my house won't sell), then a different reality intrudes. If one thinks that lifestyle changes will suffice, he is deeply mistaken.

To what end does straw man hypothetical Mike exist, if you please?

"On The Hypothetical Mike Show (now that Orpah is gone) next week we'll be discussing ways for your family to make surefire negotiations at gang roadblocks and not accidentally lose your car!! . . . "


.

Last edited by slowmover; 07-28-2011 at 09:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 10:42 PM   #44 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleanspeed1 View Post
The US Chamber of Commerce actually ENCOURAGES as much outsourcing as possible, which is economic treason to me. I don't have a problem with doing business with other countries, but when it's at the expense of my own, erm, no.

Funny that a few people on a forum about making vehicles run better can figure out economic and trade policy better than the folks who should be doing it in our respective governments.
Well, the US Chamber of Commerce is a lobbying group that pushes the interests of people who own large companies at the expense of people who have to work. While outsourcing is highly efficient for individual companies, it's poison to the society. It isn't surprising that a random group of efficiency minded people can spot this while politicians in the pocket of that lobbying group and its members are blind to it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
China is not just acting as a factory for US corporations, it is innovating itself. As an example they are scheduled to match and exceed the number of patents generated annually by the US, if they haven't already.
That's silly: I wasn't aware that China recognized IP.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 10:49 PM   #45 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
[QUOTE=Fat Charlie;252846]Well, the US Chamber of Commerce is a lobbying group that pushes the interests of people who own large companies at the expense of people who have to work. While outsourcing is highly efficient for individual companies, it's poison to the society. It isn't surprising that a random group of efficiency minded people can spot this while politicians in the pocket of that lobbying group and its members are blind to it?



Quote:
That's silly: I wasn't aware that China recognized IP.[/QUOTE
]

That's funny, but oh so true.
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 12:19 AM   #46 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
...I'll have some fun with Frank Lee: It is well-known that he has a Magic 8-Ball hood ornament that will attach to any of his five Fix-Or-Repair-Daily cars. He needs to know which of the clunkers can make it to the parts store that day to get the pieces to repair the one he really needs. I think he might have a couple thousand or so in purchase price spread across them all. Frank Lee has also stated that he lives below his means. Saving for that rainy day. Increasing his store of knowledge . . . now, me, I have one vehicle, a diesel, that I keep as nicely as can be. Study up on problems and fixes. One is enough, is my thinking. Can run on more than just retail fuel. But writing this today indicates to me that maybe Frank Lee can abandon any those old Fords and still go about his business unhindered. I can't. (I'm working on the alternates he already has). . . . .
Heh... for the record, I bought the F150 new (darn dealer wasn't about to give it to me either ) while the rest of the lot were free or close to it. Also, you'd be surprised how little I go to parts stores- they don't even know me personally anymore. Also I spend very little time fixing them- it goes, get 'em sorted out upon acquisition, then it's pretty much just smooth sailing after that. Last but not least, I am a car hoarder, so even though only one or two would be perfectly suitable, logic like that zooms right on past a hoarder!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 08:46 AM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Or get everyone's average to 23 and halve the annual miles driven... that seems eminently more doable to me cuz, well, 23 is easy to attain even with a stupid land barge. Judging by the sheer number of what appear to be ignorant single occupant joyrides, or actual legitimate runs but made with no consideration for multitasking the run, and ESPECIALLY the number of local runs that could be just as well accomplished on foot or bike, and perhaps dare to dream of people putting some consideration into arranging their lives around the notion of expensive energy rather than cheap as far as commutes and such, I would think it possible to halve the number of annual miles driven and if fuel cost more than lattes and bottled water perhaps there would be an incentive to move in that direction.
Frank and Sentra, this is a perfect example of both parties being right, something that seldom happens in forums where people tend to consider a debate an argument. Maybe that is an inevitable consequence in a Nation where we let Attorneys run things, when Accountants may be a better choice.
Fewer miles or better mileage, both are good tactics to eliminate the 300 plus billion that is bleeding this country to a judgement day sometime in the near future.
While some may follow our example and try to drive more efficiently, most could use better judgement in their daily activities to minimise distance travelled.
If both strategies are combined with better engineered vehicles with the focus on efficiency then the combination could be the overall solution.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 09:25 AM   #48 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Other places have figured that one out, with ( ironically ) the UAE taking the lead.

They're building a city designed WITHOUT cars. They are banned altogether.

Take a look.


Abu Dhabi
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 07:03 PM   #49 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Fewer miles or better mileage, both are good tactics to eliminate the 300 plus billion that is bleeding this country to a judgement day sometime in the near future.
While some may follow our example and try to drive more efficiently, most could use better judgement in their daily activities to minimise distance travelled.
That's why I'm such a fan of taxing the hell out of it. Everyone's got their own priorities, and simply making oil more expensive would let the market sort things out. As an added bonus, there would actually be money to maintain our roads and bridges.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (07-30-2011)
Old 07-30-2011, 12:38 AM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Yes, they are stupid. What's stupidity, if not being able to learn? We've spent the last decade or so watching gas prices take big jumps every year or so. Anyone who's bothered to listen to news, or read newspapers & magazines, or in any way keep informed about what's going on in the world, has heard people who are supposed to know predict that prices are just going to keep going up over long term.
Yep, "people who are supposed to know". That's a good description of the so-called economic and political experts.

The cost of fuel keeps rising, but that's not inflationary. And the cost of transporting any and all goods raises the price of everything we buy, but that's not inflation either.

We have a government that has redefined what the word inflation means, (thanks to economists who are the boot-kissers of government policy wonks) and by now they have brainwashed the public (through their toadies, the media) that rising prices are no longer considered inflation. Why? Because they fear deflation much more than inflation, so unrelenting inflation is the now accepted and approved norm.

They are in denial. Denial is more than a river in Egypt. And if you accept the official propaganda that rising prices are not inflationary, you too are brainwashed.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com