12-31-2009, 11:48 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Ecomodder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 259
Thanks: 41
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
Mobil 1 0W-30 Advanced Fuel Economy
I decided to try out Mobil 1 0W-30 Advanced Fuel Economy to test the claims of an additional 2% more fuel efficiency vs conventional motor oil.
According to that I should see about a 0.85 mpg gain in the winter and a 1.1 mpg gain in the summer.
I understand small changes are difficult to track especially since my gas mileage can easily change 5+ mpg from one tank to the next.
I will report any findings over the next several tanks.
If anyone else has any results from using this product or any other 0w-30 product (as I'm sure almost all 0w-30 oils will have a lower viscosity then their 5w-30 or 10w-30 counterparts) feel free to chime in.
__________________
Lifetime mpg
2012 mpg
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 12:46 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
The mileage gains are reported as "potential" gains, and come only from the fact that the oil performs as a zero weight when it's cold. The comparison, if I remember correctly, is made against standard 10W30 oils.
I run it in my Van, I've had it in for over 10k miles, and only added 1.5 qts in that time, with the same filter, no air filter, and it still looks like oil last time I checked, which was, admittedly, about a month ago.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 10:33 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
I used M1 0W30, and I never "saw" an improvement, but I'm sure it was there. The expected improvement is much smaller than my ability to measure, and would be totally lost in the day-to-day noise in my data. The fact that I understand how and why it's expected to improve my fuel economy will have to suffice. Although, I am able to verify that a cold engine starts easier when it's got 0Wx synthetic.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:42 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
ECO-Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3AkAzOiD
I decided to try out Mobil 1 0W-30 Advanced Fuel Economy to test the claims of an additional 2% more fuel efficiency vs conventional motor oil.
According to that I should see about a 0.85 mpg gain in the winter and a 1.1 mpg gain in the summer.
I understand small changes are difficult to track especially since my gas mileage can easily change 5+ mpg from one tank to the next.
I will report any findings over the next several tanks.
If anyone else has any results from using this product or any other 0w-30 product (as I'm sure almost all 0w-30 oils will have a lower viscosity then their 5w-30 or 10w-30 counterparts) feel free to chime in.
|
I think that the 2% is just for the engine and will not translate to an overall FE increase of 2%. I think the biggest plus is less wear and tear during cold operations where most damage is done.
Might try a search. I though there was a thread on API Fuel conserving engine oil requirements and testing. I did a quick search but did not find it.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:47 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 123 Times in 90 Posts
|
Yeah, the issue with Mobil's claims is that they're not comparing between theirs and any other oil of a comparable weight, but between there's and a heavier oil. So really, and 0w30 could claim that. The also compare between 0w20 and 5w20 for the oil I just put in my engine
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 04:35 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Of course, M1 isn't trying to attract new customers with their claims, because they (somewhat) openly say that the comparison is between oils of different weights, not different brands. They're not making a claim so that you'll go from, say, Pennzoil to M1, they're making the claim so that you'll buy their 0W synthetics.
(At least that's how I read it when I bought the stuff.)
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 07:01 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dalton, GA.
Posts: 92
Metro - '98 Chevrolet Metro LSi 90 day: 44.6 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Is a possible 2% gain even really worth the cost? (If there is a difference)
I know the 0W-30 stuff and the normals weights are the same price at Wal-mart. Is this true elsewhere too?
__________________
Trying to make the most of what God has given me.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathan150cc
Is a possible 2% gain even really worth the cost? (If there is a difference)
|
Synthetic is a good idea anyway, because of the extended oil change interval and reduced cold-start engine wear. It's worth the price premium over conventional, in my book. Since 0Wx retails for the same as 5Wx, grabbing the zero-W is a no-brainer.
0W20 is slightly more expensive at wholesale than 5W20.
|
|
|
01-01-2010, 11:30 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
I use it in my car and in the wife's. Cost is the same at WalMart so no reason not to. Haven't seen any noticeable gains and don't expect to, but we already used 5w30 synthetic for the other reasons stated above. One thing I can say is that it didn't hurt our FE!
|
|
|
01-02-2010, 12:14 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362
Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic 90 day: 25.89 mpg (US) Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E 90 day: 37.07 mpg (US) Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US) Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
i'm wondering what is the lowest viscosity i should try on my car
I wanted to try the new castrol Edge but i use 20 w/50 becasue my dad has always told me once cars are over 125 thoushand miles to use higher viscosity oil for more protection and all of his cars have always run pristine so i don't mind stickin by that to make my motor last
__________________
Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Domman56 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|