07-08-2009, 09:20 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
NASCAR "Advanced Fuel Economy Dodge"; NASCAR Prius model coming soon!
(OK, the Prius part is a joke.)
ExxonMobil Unveils No. 77 Mobil 1 Advanced Fuel Economy Dodge | Catchfence
Cognitive dissonance alert! An ... odd ... marketing combination: a 4 MPG (US) race car trying to sell fuel economy.
I went to the article expecting to read about some technical advances in the Dodge itself. But it's really about branding, not actual fuel economy. The Dodge is sponsored by Mobil, which is trying to sell people on the idea of going with lighter weight, synthetic oil to save fuel.
It gets weirder:
Quote:
Before this unique version of the No. 77 car takes to the track, the weekend will kick off with The Mobil 1 Advanced Fuel Economy NASCAR Challenge, a special event to entertain Chicago sports fans and provide them with tips on saving fuel.
The Mobil 1 Advanced Fuel Economy NASCAR Challenge will take place on July 10 at Soldier Field in downtown Chicago. Penske NASCAR stars Sam Hornish Jr., Kurt Busch, and David Stremme – along with media celebrities such as Dan Patrick and Chicago Bear Hall of Famer Dan Hampton – will drive fuel-efficient Mobil 1-branded Smart cars on a miniature road course.
|
Bizarre.
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 10:21 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
... lighter weight, synthetic oil...
|
Viscosity, not "weight." No matter how commonly-used the misnomer "weight" is when discussing oil, that is not a real oil-rating term.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 11:05 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 659
Thanks: 20
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
wow $400 over the 40+year life span of a car - sign me up.... oh does that take into account the cost of the Mobil 1 blah blah over a decent regular 0w40 oil??
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly
twitter.com/bertchalmers
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 11:57 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robchalmers
... the cost of the Mobil 1 blah blah over a decent regular 0w40 oil??
|
There aren't any "0W" non-synthetics.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2009, 06:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Driving the TurboWeasel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
M1 is okay syn oil.
Darn, I'd love to see a hybrid NASCAR! They'd have to beef up the battery packs so they didn't get mangled in the inevitable crash.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2009, 03:49 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
I don't think racing on circular tracks would make for a successful hybrid application: they make more sense where you could capture braking energy via some form of regen. Not too much braking in NASCAR, I don't think.
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2009, 08:56 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Ecomod noob
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tooele, UT
Posts: 412
ZJ - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo Upcountry 90 day: 20.57 mpg (US) Neon - '03 Dodge Neon SE 90 day: 33.46 mpg (US) S'Crew - '02 Ford F150 Supercrew XLT 90 day: 16.4 mpg (US) Ranger - '90 Ford Ranger Last 3: 28.02 mpg (US) Not the Jeep - '03 Dodge Neon SE 90 day: 34.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
|
Whole lot more braking than you think...
__________________
When it comes to Heroes, RENEGADES are mine!
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2009, 08:38 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
I didn't know that.
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2009, 09:12 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
Not much braking going on at daytona or talladega, except maybe at a caution.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2009, 02:35 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
Any big track racing is pure full throttle top gear, tilt the wheel a little, straighten it back up, tilt the wheel a little... zzzzz.... I can actually stand to watch the short track racing where they actually have to use brakes and sometimes even *gasp* shift gears.
The racing of smart cars to say something about fuel economy is funny... I guess they're proving that you can even get crappy fuel economy out of a little car if you thrash on it hard enough. I'd be interested to find out what kind of numbers they get, though. Probably still beats a hummer cruising at 45.
|
|
|
|
|
