Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2010, 07:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
alternating valve engine
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: oklahoma city, oklahoma USA
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New turbo transfers power direct to the crank

I have finished the design work on a turbo that I invented several years ago. The patent is now pending. The turbo has four pick up blades, one located very near each exhaust port of a four cylinder inline engine. A common shaft joins the four pick up blades and at one end is a compressor blade which blows air into the engine just like a normal turbo. At the other end of the shaft is a very small gear reduction box which drives a small slipage converter which drives a ring gear that is connected to the rear of the crankshaft. Once the desired amount air boost is aquired from the front of the turbo, instead of a waste gate the unit transfers the remaining energy to the rear of the unit where the gear box picks up the energy. If you want additional info call anytime 405 751 4521. Please be polite. I am not interested in arguements. Combine this with my Alternating valve engine and mileage will go the the moon.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-30-2010, 07:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
You can't have egg, bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 07:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 52.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
This is very old news.
Turbo-compound engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 11:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Hydrogen Nut
 
Ptero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 152

Smart Car ForTwo Pure - '08 Smart Fortwo Pure stripped
90 day: 51.35 mpg (US)

BMW 750iL V12 - '90 BMW V12
90 day: 26.4 mpg (US)

Wildfire 250C - '08 Shandong Pioneer 250C
Thanks: 2
Thanked 33 Times in 22 Posts
I think you will find the efficiency gain requires the engine to be operated at a very high rpm because the turbine requires a high volume of exhaust gas to provide any benefit. Note the two-stroke diesel engines and the necessarily high rpm aircraft engines mentioned in the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, this is the realm of horsepower and is far above the realm of torque, where mpg gains are made.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 02:22 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I hate to break it to you but turbo-compounding was invented many, many years ago.

Well, OK, I don't hate breaking it to you.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Joe_Bloe (10-06-2010)
Old 10-01-2010, 05:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 659

Chug - '96 Volkswagon Polo CL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.42 mpg (US)

L'Autre - '03 Renault Megane Sport Tourer Expression
Diesel
90 day: 45.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
As above, bitof an old idea which has been sidelined for sometime IIRC it was because the net gain wasn't great enough compared to a regular turbo on smaller engines, there is a lot of work (@crank and compression) from not-a-lot of work out (exhaust)
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly






twitter.com/bertchalmers
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 08:42 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I wonder what the motivation is? Do people send him money or what?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 01:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
"Once the desired amount air boost is aquired from the front of the turbo, instead of a waste gate the unit transfers the remaining energy to the rear of the unit where the gear box picks up the energy."

Should read:

Once the desired amount of cash is aquired [sic] from the rubes, instead of a workable product the unit transfers the remaining money to the rear of the shop where my brother-in-law, Buba, picks up the cash.


Last edited by Rokeby; 10-01-2010 at 02:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 03:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Ptero - In theory, couldn't you spin a smaller engine faster to get the same HP out of a similar amount of fuel?
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 04:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...the R3350 engines on our Lockheed EC-121 "Warning Star" airborne radar station were "turbo-compound" where three power-recovery turbines (PRT) "collected" exhaust energy and coupled it directly back to the main crankshaft.

...good for an additional 150 hp from 3,000 hp engine...and really helped reduce their fuel consumption numbers at cruise.


Last edited by gone-ot; 10-02-2010 at 05:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Paul & Sabrina's cheap DIY 144v motor controller MPaulHolmes Open ReVolt: open source DC motor controller 7381 08-02-2023 11:55 PM
Power Steering delete for fuel economy gain - anyone done it? bennelson EcoModding Central 92 01-27-2017 04:58 PM
Why We Have No Wind or Solar Power SuperTrooper General Efficiency Discussion 220 07-20-2011 11:37 PM
Diesel Power Magazine Disappointment. ConnClark EcoModding Central 16 06-05-2009 11:39 PM
Turbo to drive accessories? reformed EcoModding Central 14 06-22-2008 05:28 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com