Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-04-2011, 01:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Heating may cause temper problems with the metal, so best to go with chop saw, etc.. You could wrap it next to the cut with a strip of cloth, soaked in cutting fluid or oil, which would simultaneously lubricate the cut and keep the metal cool.

Cut springs is an ongoing controversy on the BMW forums, with purists claiming the only solution is buying aftermarket springs, yet others who've cut a coil or two off the stock springs mostly (but not all) saying the ride and handling was as good or better than pre-cut. Consensus view is never to cut with a torch, due to temper issues weakening the metal.

I'll probably cut my springs as noted above, see how it works, and then go to aftermarket lowering springs if needed.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-05-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-04-2011, 07:46 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwebb View Post
it is very common
for me to see lowered cars with smoked tires , smoked on the inside ... without the follow up of correctly adjusting the camber back to where the specification shows that it belongs
In general, the toe angle (which is adjustable on the front of all cars that I know of, and adjustable to at least some extent on the rear of almost all) causes more problems than camber does. Unless you wind up with more than around 3 degrees of negative camber, you get fairly little extra wear.

I have about 15 years of driving on cars that have about 2 degrees negative camber (a bit more on the drive wheels, a bit less on the non-drive ones) in two different types of cars (two examples each); one with a MacPherson front and semi-trailing arm rear and one with double wishbones all the way around. Neither one exhibited more than a very little bit of "camber wear". I know people with more who also have not seen odd wear.

Toe-out can completely obliterate the inside edge of a tire. The tires that came on my first car of the four I mention above were shredded. The inside corners had been ground off to the point where the ends of the wires that make up the steel belts were sticking out of where the tread used to be! (I should have gotten it aligned when I bought the car.) The car didn't have much camber, but it had a lot of toe out. After the alignment, which set the rears up to toe-in slightly and gave me some negative camber, the wear was fine and the handling a whole lot better.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to some_other_dave For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-05-2011)
Old 11-04-2011, 11:44 PM   #23 (permalink)
Ecomodder
 
Fr3AkAzOiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 259

Cobalt XFE - '08 Chevrolet Cobalt XFE
Team Chevy
90 day: 41.1 mpg (US)

'05 Malibu V6 Tow Vehicle/Track Car - '05 Chevrolet Malibu LS V6
90 day: 23.12 mpg (US)

'08 XFE average for 2013 - '08 Chevrolet Cobalt XFE
90 day: 41.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladogaboy View Post
As I understand it, by shortening the spring, the shock/damper stays at a more compressed state than it is designed for.

Thats what I have heard as well. Was looking into picking up this for my car.
Cobalt FE5 Struts and Shock with Pedder Spring Pkg TCSS - Crate Engine Depot
Then realised I would need to pay for an alignment and pay extra for a shim kit for the rear as my current one probably wouldn't work anymore.

$800 for lowering it would make it look better and get slightly better mpgs but would never pay for itself.

Then I hit a racoon a few weeks back but lucked out on no body damage and only needed to bang the radiator back into shape with a hammer and block of wood. Had I been 2 inches lower it could have caused a whole lot more damage to the car.
__________________
Lifetime mpg


2012 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 02:41 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Yeah, I priced out lowering coils for my car as well, and it isn't cost effective for now. Given the price to buy, install, and align, I'm going to just going to save up to get a mid-range set of coilovers. I don't ever expect them to pay for themselves based on the mpg, but at least with coilovers, I can justify the expense for other reasons. :-)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2011, 07:49 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
How many on this thread have 60,000 hours experience working on cars. That was earning a living working on cars, and never spending a second in court explaining your methods of solving problems for thousands of people.

Race car drivers like negative camber for cornering. The springs on your car are most likely perfectly functional. If you want the car lower then take off 10-15% of the total spring length. You can test the vehicle by loading it to capacity to see the ride height you do not want to exceed by lowering.

While you have it apart replace the bump stops or you will wipe out the shocks. Even though they may look good they are probably old. Seen to many shock jobs ruined by not replacing the bump stops.

Now if you have to put some "performance" aftermarket shocks or springs on your car, and you can not be convinced otherwise, do your due diligence and thoroughly research the comments of those who have preceded you in that effort.

I never charged people for advice, I just wrote this exact same thing on their Repair Order so when they forgot the good advice and chose to ignore it, it was documented to protect me from their actions years later.

What is on your car has passed the test of time and will work just fine? You already paid for them when you bought the car, and if you are careful, and you do not carry max loads, you can accomplish your objective with some sweat equity. Stronger spring, lower ride height, new bump stops to preserve your existing struts, all for just the cost of the bump stops.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-05-2011), jime57 (11-05-2011), TEiN (11-08-2011)
Old 11-05-2011, 11:35 AM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Now if you have to put some "performance" aftermarket shocks or springs on your car, and you can not be convinced otherwise, do your due diligence and thoroughly research the comments of those who have preceded you in that effort.
I think the most important thing to take into account is that each person's needs are different. While cut springs might be fine for a daily, softly driven commuter vehicle, they might not be the best option for other applications. I guess Old Mechanic stated the golden rule: Do your homework.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2011, 10:57 AM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
In my experience, simply cutting out the springs without considering the rest of the suspension isn't a great thing to do on modern "cheap" cars, because most run with dampers that are too soft to handle the extra stiffness and load of cut springs.

But then, my experience has been mostly with your common cheap Japanese compact, most of which are woefully under-damped. And I drive over really bad roads. Bad enough to have bent eight wheels over the last several years of driving (often at a very reasonable 50-60 mph... our highways are garbage). Cutting springs on these cars makes them ride like skateboards on bedsprings.

If you live in an area with glass-smooth roads and don't do any performance driving, cutting springs (provided you make sure your bump stops are okay, alignment doesn't suffer and you don't take a god-awful amount of spring off) may be okay, but for those who don't live in a perfect world, no. Not really.

And aftermarket springs? Sag? Not any worse than stock springs, and often less... unless you're buying the real cheap stuff, in which case, you're getting what you're paying for. Unfortunately, most aftermarket "lowering" springs are garbage. They lower the car too much and hasten the death of the stock dampers as badly as poorly cut springs. If you're lucky, you can find guides (such as exist on the Honda and Mazda boards) that will tell you which springs have what spring rates, but in most cases, you get zip.

There are other means of lowering the car, too. For instance, suspension changes between the B13 and B14 Sentras means you can use the B13 Sentra front struts on a B14 for about an inch or an inch-and-a-half lowering with no problems other than a slight increase to the Sentra's already considerable propensity to bottom out.

Some good parts scavenging and eBay trolling for "stock sports suspensions" for different variants of your car can achieve similar, if these are available.

Last edited by niky; 11-07-2011 at 11:05 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2011, 11:21 AM   #28 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
I will test the effect of lowering to fuel consumtion with spring clamps designed for the job. So I will clamp the springs lower heigth and test their effect on fuel consumtion. With clamps I do not mean clamps you use to compress the whole spring, but smaller similar system however.

Test will be done on smooth tarmac so suspension arent so heavily stressed in this test. I will try to get the ground clearance to 80mm which is mimimun in europe. If I can see a difference I migh buy new adjustable coilover suspension for my Lupo.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2011, 11:26 AM   #29 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Vekke - that will be very interesting!

Would you please reply this thread again even if you post a new thread? (I don't want to miss it.)
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2011, 11:57 AM   #30 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
First I will have to make the exhaust pipe to back, because it is the lowest point at the moment when it sits behind the front tire. ETA for this lowering test is about one month... I will post the effects propably just here and to my lupo thread.

PS, Yesterday I did some tuft testing and adjustment to my kammback spoiler and video of that will follow later. As I thought I could tilt the spoiler much more.

__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com