Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2011, 09:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Lightbulb Reducing ride height by "resetting" coil springs

Another interesting article on Autospeed:

Resetting coil springs to alter your car's ride height




Quote:
Want to tweak the ride height of your car? By f-a-r the most cost-effective approach is to reset the existing coil springs.
Reset the springs – what’s that, you ask?

Well, as the name implies, it’s a process that involves heating the springs until they’re red-hot and resetting their free length to your specification. The process is then finished by quenching, tempering, shot-peening and powder coating. It’s essentially a remanufactured spring.

There are two main advantages to this approach. First, resetting the existing coil springs doesn’t affect spring rate, so you can enjoy a modified ride height with absolutely no trade-off in ride quality.
Full article & pics:

Resetting coil springs to alter your car's ride height

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-03-2011, 10:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoBus Driver
 
tinduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 54

EcoBus - '09 VW Multivan SL TDI 103 KW
90 day: 42.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Hm.

There is a reason for the fact that most shorter springs you can buy are harder too... With this method, you sacrifice loading capacity and/or bad-road capability because your unsprung mass will more often use the whole freedom of movement it has left. With shorter, but harder springs, you get an uncomfortable ride, but hold basically on to the old capabilities regarding the above points.

Naturally, it all depends on how far you want to go... down, that is.

so long,

tinduck
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 01:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
PSmodder lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
Replace with thoroughly engineered products. Lowering your stance requires the tuning harmony and balance for enhanced driving dynamics. Here's a proven supplier - Eibach Springs : Pro-Kit (Step 1)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 01:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Good point.

I suppose also the owner's typical driving circumstances might dictate what approach would be best (in terms of stiffness vs. bottoming out).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 05:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It was far cheaper for me to just cut 'em! (although I did heat juuuust enough to reshape the cut coil so it would seat nicely) And I'm happy with the ride and handling too.

I'd suspect that coil bind with these re-heighted springs could be a common occurance...

P.S. I doubt any of the "pro-engineered" kits ride/handle ANY better than mine!
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 11-03-2011 at 05:50 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 06:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
It was far cheaper for me to just cut 'em! (although I did heat juuuust enough to reshape the cut coil so it would seat nicely) And I'm happy with the ride and handling too.
When you shorten a spring you stiffen the spring rate. Imagine standing in the middle of a 12 foot 2x4 suspended at each end. A 6 foot 2x4 would feel twice as stiff. Cutting may be a better compromise between altered height and minimum cost. Resetting wouldn't be free unless you own a spring shop.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 08:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
resetting

During auto shop at Taft High in the 1960s,one of our budget minded low-rider classmates decided he would 'reset' his coil springs,while installed on the car,with an oxyacetylene torch.They referred to it as 'torching the springs.'
And yes,he managed to catch his car on fire which was hilarious in a terrifying way,but not as funny as the reaction of Mr.Howard,our shop instructor,who,when he realized what was going on nearly lost it completely.
I've never heard a teacher cuss out a student so completely and without ever actually using any expletives!
Thanks for the memory!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 09:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
It's a great way to ruin the temper of a spring and weaken it significantly. At least, the home-brew "torching" is. It sounds like they may do post-treatment to make sure the metal is re-tempered, but I still wouldn't trust it. And I really would not trust myself to do it at home!!

Nor anyone else, for that matter.

It's easy enough to buy springs in just about any rate you want with just about any free length.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 11:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
I still prefer to go with coils that are specifically manufactured to be shorter. Also, most OEM springs aren't progressive, so if you go with an aftermarket replacement that is progressive (such as the Eibachs listed above), you might be able to lower your car while enjoying an improved ride quality.

The other thing you'll have to account for is the shock/damper travel/length. If you go too short, you risk destroying the shock/damper, or at the very least, decreasing its lifespan significantly.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2011, 11:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
The other thing you'll have to account for is the shock/damper travel/length. If you go too short, you risk destroying the shock/damper, or at the very least, decreasing its lifespan significantly.
Why's that? All the suspensions I've seen have rubber bumpers for cushioning any bottoming out. I'd think at the worst, you'd be hitting them more often than desired.

I used stock gas charged struts for my lowering job. It's been so long since I've dropped that car (about 2") I can't remember how old they are... must be going on 8 years or so with no issues.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-05-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com