Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2015, 12:48 PM   #21 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
I ran some numbers to see what kind of heat transfer we could possibly get from this thing. The calculations are pretty simple. This is based off the heat differential between the air and the coolant. Air (assumed dry, moist air will hold more heat) holds X amount of energy per cubic foot. If you move X number of cubic feet that is Y degrees above coolant temperature you have Z amount of energy. This is the chart I came up with. The chart units are degrees F (horizontal), CFM (vertical), and watts (chart body) to compare to a block heater for example.

When I googled 'car blower fan cfm' it seemed like 200-300 seemed normal. I have an extra blower fan kicking around that I plan on using should testing continue to prove this worthwhile.

Manifold temperature will be a future test. I know my Paseo's manifold got to 580F after 5 minutes of idling. Thus I know a higher temp is possible, so the chart goes to 700F.

One last but very important note, these numbers do not take into consideration the efficiency of the air to coolant heat exchanger (I'm thinking a heater core or two will do the job). The heat exchanger will definitely create a efficiency hit. Just off the top of my head, I'd estimate 50%.



The numbers aren't super amazing, but they are substantial I think. I think its reasonable to assume we can get 400°F temp air with 200 CFM giving us a possible 5600W, but at 50% heat exchanger efficiency we're looking at 2800W. If we compare this to MetroMPG's block heater vs time chart (test on his Metro), that would give us a 70F coolant temp rise in 12 minutes. Obviously, this also isn't realistic because everything has a warm up time. The manifold isn't going to instantly be making 400F air, and certainly not at 200 CFM.

Moving forward, testing will refine these numbers and show what is really possible out of this setup.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	exhaustheatchart.jpg
Views:	232
Size:	117.4 KB
ID:	18112  
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (06-26-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-26-2015, 01:25 PM   #22 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Yes, it would offset it. The offset is just very marginal. In order to heat up the coolant faster, we need to move large amounts of heat. Heat is energy. The fan also uses energy, but its (hopefully) moving a LOT more energy than its using.

Its akin to a furnace blower. My home furnace blower fan uses ~300 watts of power, but it moves 80k BTU/hr which is the equivalent of about 23,500 watts.

Also, the fan is only going to be used during warm up. Once the engine coolant is warm, it'll turn off. So, its not a continuous draw.
You could reverse your plan. Put a solenoid-controlled or manually-controlled shutter on the front grill block and allow forced air to go through to the airbox, then the exchanger, then a fan used to generate power. Restriction from the piping, exchanger, and fan could be tuned to slow the air down giving more time for the "heat exchange" The fan/generator offsets solenoid's power use. If your shutter were manually operated you'd have a side benefit of (minor) energy production.

EDIT: Nevermind, given this chart... forced air would never move as much air as a fan.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.




Last edited by California98Civic; 06-26-2015 at 01:32 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 04:43 PM   #23 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
Yeah, you really need more airflow than you can get by ducting air from the front of the car.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2015, 11:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
Full sized hybrid.
 
Isaac Zackary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 602

Suzy - '13 Toyota Avalon Hybrid XLE
90 day: 37.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 108 Times in 84 Posts
Not just air flow, you need convection. The VW Beetles can put out only a little over 200F air in the cabin vents. And that's with heavily finned aluminum OEM heat exchangers (fins on both the inside and outside of the exhaust manifolds!) with not a lot of air flow. Maybe if you had finned exhaust from the tail pipe clear onto the exhaust manifold, but that still probably wouldn't get you enough heat.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Isaac Zackary For This Useful Post:
Daox (06-27-2015)
Old 06-27-2015, 12:46 PM   #25 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
Really? I find that quite odd. I'd imagine if you have a 600-700F manifold, it shouldn't be too much of a problem to get 300+F air. Well, after I test the exhaust manifold temp warm up times, building the box/heat exchanger would be the next step to see how hot we can get the air to.

Thanks for the info. That means the heat exchanger will definitely need to be made with much thought put into it.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 11:46 AM   #26 (permalink)
Full sized hybrid.
 
Isaac Zackary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 602

Suzy - '13 Toyota Avalon Hybrid XLE
90 day: 37.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 108 Times in 84 Posts
Of course there's a ways from the heat exchangers in the engine in the rear of the car all the way to the vents in the front which allows for some heat loss. But still, this is with exhaust manifolds that have fins both inside and out. It's not bad for heating the inside up to nearly 90F on a 30F day. But when guys get aftermarket heat exchangers is when they notice a huge difference, because then they don't get enough heat to make any difference in cabin temps. That's because aftermarket heat exchangers don't have fins. In other words I don't think this thread's idea would work, at least not without a finned exhaust manifold.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 05:50 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,097

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,573 Times in 1,595 Posts
My thoughts:

Divert one of the engine's coolant hoses (inside the loop behind the thermostat) through a copper tube wrapped around the exhaust manifold. Add a heatercore with a fan that's wired in parallel with the radiator's fan to help with cooling once everything is warmed up.

Honda built the G1 Insight with a waterjacket on the exhaust manifold and beefed up the main radiator a bit to compensate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2015, 11:10 AM   #28 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zackary View Post
Of course there's a ways from the heat exchangers in the engine in the rear of the car all the way to the vents in the front which allows for some heat loss. But still, this is with exhaust manifolds that have fins both inside and out. It's not bad for heating the inside up to nearly 90F on a 30F day. But when guys get aftermarket heat exchangers is when they notice a huge difference, because then they don't get enough heat to make any difference in cabin temps. That's because aftermarket heat exchangers don't have fins. In other words I don't think this thread's idea would work, at least not without a finned exhaust manifold.
Do you have any pictures of this exhaust manifold for reference? I did a quick google image search, but I really don't know exactly what I'm looking for.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2015, 11:15 AM   #29 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
My thoughts:

Divert one of the engine's coolant hoses (inside the loop behind the thermostat) through a copper tube wrapped around the exhaust manifold. Add a heatercore with a fan that's wired in parallel with the radiator's fan to help with cooling once everything is warmed up.

Honda built the G1 Insight with a waterjacket on the exhaust manifold and beefed up the main radiator a bit to compensate.
That is definitely a doable idea. I guess I just don't want the aero or electrical fan load penalty of having to get rid of that heat once up to temperature.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2015, 11:50 AM   #30 (permalink)
09 Toyo Yaris HB (Huevos)
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Bay Area Calfornia
Posts: 78
Thanks: 2
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Diesel motorhomes and certain luxury water craft have tackle this idea from a different direction and for a different purpose. They use the exhaust heat for domestic hot water, But you can use the same idea. What they've done is essentially created a tube within a tube with coolant circulation through thea coil in the domestic hotater heater. I'm not sure when it was first used but the GMC gas motor homes of the 1970s had it as a popular option. So oking at that literature may give you some ideas for the heat exchanger design.

Rather than route the coolant to a separate radiator you could route it back through the transmission cooler loop in the radiator, assuming you aren't using it to cool the automatic transmission already.

The trick would be to find the right fittings, fab up the heat exchanger, and probably a valve to close off the heating for longer trips where you would not want extra heat circulating back to the radiator.
If you are doing it up right you'll also need some tee fitting to create a "to" "from" loop to the expansion tank.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com