Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2020, 03:32 PM   #621 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
How come the Civic gets the same fuel economy as the Fit? Since I generally do not ask people questions that Google should be able to answer, I asked Google! I have not found an answer yet, but this article says that the Civic hatchback barely has 2% more passenger room than the Fit. If you keep scrolling it also says that the Acura TSX Special Edition is better than the Civic Si.

The only useful information that I found was from Bob is the Oil Guy. It sounds like the Fit has sporty gearing even in top gear, while the Civic of the same year revs much lower. Someone also complained that the Fit doesn't have an Eco mode, because driving intelligently is hard!

As always, it sounds like car manufacturers try harder with more expensive models and get lazy with the entry-level ones.

__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-23-2020, 04:03 PM   #622 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
How come the Civic gets the same fuel economy as the Fit? ...
I bet the gearing matters, like you say, and I think the Fit has a drag coefficient like 0.34 or 0.36 while the Civic is more like 0.30 or lower. CdA might be worse, too. Fit must be narrower, but it is also taller.

Part of what made the Fit an "economy car" was the price, not just the FE. Sad to see it go.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (07-23-2020), Xist (07-23-2020)
Old 07-23-2020, 05:09 PM   #623 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Since the vast majority of people finance, it isn't just saving $1,000 up front, but compounding interest. Google says that a manual Fit is $16,190. Experian says "The average auto loan interest rate in the last quarter of 2019 was 5.76% for a new car," and BankRate says a 60-month loan would have $2,482 in interest.

Okay, Google is giving me different information than you guys. Adjust accordingly. It says $20,000 for an LX sedan with a manual transmission. Both of these were the cheapest options. Just changing the purchase price, BankRate says that would accrue $3,066 in interest.

I think that is correct. I needed to calculate it multiple times. I would change the price for the Civic and the payment and interest would go down. Random other things would change.

$584 is less than I expected and a $3,810 was more than I anticipated, so if the difference were $1,000 there would be an additional $153.28 in interest.

"Why didn't you pay $1,000 more for the Civic?"
"It would have cost $1,153.28 more with interest!"
"Yes, but our elbows are touching!"
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-23-2020)
Old 07-23-2020, 06:02 PM   #624 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,477

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 305
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
How come the Civic gets the same fuel economy as the Fit?
The Civic uses Honda's new 1.5L turbo engine while the Fit uses the old 1.5L NA engine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
As always, it sounds like car manufacturers try harder with more expensive models and get lazy with the entry-level ones.
Buyers expect entry level cars to be cheap which means you can't load them up with expensive tech.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
Since the vast majority of people finance, it isn't just saving $1,000 up front, but compounding interest. Google says that a manual Fit is $16,190....

Okay, Google is giving me different information than you guys. Adjust accordingly. It says $20,000 for an LX sedan with a manual transmission. Both of these were the cheapest options. ..."
Go directly to Honda for the best info. I also use the "Build page because MSRP never includes delivery charges.

The base Honda LX has a MSRP of $16,190 and a mandatory delivery charge of $955 for a total of $17,145. However nobody in the USA buys a manual anymore (2019 market share was 1%) The cheapest automatic Fit you can buy is $17,945

The base Civic comes with a CVT standard. The base Civic LX is $21,755 with delivery.

So you save $3810 buying the Fit - which is another reason Honda is getting rid of the Fit. It doesn't cost anywhere near $3810 less to build a Fit compared to a Civic. I wouldn't be surprised if Honda sells the base Fit at a loss.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
Xist (07-23-2020)
Old 07-23-2020, 06:15 PM   #625 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,477

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 305
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
The 1990 Civic Wagon had 98.4" in wheelbase (161.7 legnth), the 2008 Fit 96.5" wheelbase (157.4 length), the 2020 Civic is 106.3 wheelbase (177.9 legnth), the 2020 Accord is 111.4 wheelbase (192.2 legnth), and the 2020 Fit is 99.6 wheelbase (161.4 legnth).

The Fit has grown larger but now only matches the 1990 Civic Wagon better as a result.

I checked for context and the early 1950s Nash Rambler, one of the original compact cars, had a 100" wheelbase & 176" legnth.
What really matters is interior dimensions not external ones. That is also how how cars are classified. The Honda Accord was classified as a subcompact car in 1985 and it is a large car today. It has grown 3 classes in 35 years but still manages to get 30% better fuel economy and is cheaper (adjusted for inflation)

A 1990 Civic Wagon (116 cu ft) is almost the same size as a 2020 Fit (113 cu ft. The Civic has more cargo room behind the seats while the Fit has quite a bit more passenger room.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Civic vs Fit.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	53.8 KB
ID:	28801   Click image for larger version

Name:	85 Accord vs 20.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	38.1 KB
ID:	28802  
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (07-23-2020), redpoint5 (07-23-2020)
Old 07-23-2020, 07:18 PM   #626 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
I just saw that both were 1.5l and wondered if they used the same engine, so installing a turbo wouldn't be the same as transplanting the Civic drivetrain.

What kind of fuel economy would I get if I bought a 2020 Accord, installed the drivetrain into my 1999 Accord, and sold the rest for parts?

I am pretty sure that the 2.0l Civic would work. Wikipedia says that the K20C2 has 158 HP and 138 pounds-feet of torque and the F23A1 has 150 HP and 192-pound-feet of torque.

Really?! The 2.0 has 8 HP more and 54 L-F less?!

I did not expect that.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2020, 07:36 PM   #627 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
... A 1990 Civic Wagon (116 cu ft) is almost the same size as a 2020 Fit (113 cu ft. The Civic has more cargo room behind the seats while the Fit has quite a bit more passenger room.
I see the point, but I think the external dimensions matter, especially for public perception. Most people know nothing about EPA standards for subcompact or midsize. They think a Fit is a small car because of length and such--and also think the Civic is a midsized car (or at least bigger than a Fit). However, by EPA standards for "EPA Interior Volume" both the 2020 Fit (112.3 cu ft) and the 2020 Civic sedan (112.9 cu ft) are midsized. So how can the CAFE standards affect a Fit differently than a Civic sedan?

From the EPA website:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20200723_161528.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	39.8 KB
ID:	28803  
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2020, 08:31 PM   #628 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
I just saw that both were 1.5l and wondered if they used the same engine, so installing a turbo wouldn't be the same as transplanting the Civic drivetrain.

What kind of fuel economy would I get if I bought a 2020 Accord, installed the drivetrain into my 1999 Accord, and sold the rest for parts?

I am pretty sure that the 2.0l Civic would work. Wikipedia says that the K20C2 has 158 HP and 138 pounds-feet of torque and the F23A1 has 150 HP and 192-pound-feet of torque.

Really?! The 2.0 has 8 HP more and 54 L-F less?!

I did not expect that.
The Fit is currently an L15A7, the Civic is an L15B7 turbo... so I'd guess interchanging them wouldn't be too hard?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2020, 09:47 PM   #629 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,477

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 305
Thanked 2,050 Times in 1,384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
I see the point, but I think the external dimensions matter, especially for public perception. Most people know nothing about EPA standards for subcompact or midsize. They think a Fit is a small car because of length and such--and also think the Civic is a midsized car (or at least bigger than a Fit). However, by EPA standards for "EPA Interior Volume" both the 2020 Fit (112.3 cu ft) and the 2020 Civic sedan (112.9 cu ft) are midsized. So how can the CAFE standards affect a Fit differently than a Civic sedan?
  • EPA vehicle classes are set by interior volume. The Civic is classified as a midsize sedan (110 - 119 cu ft) while the Fit is a small station wagon (less than 130 cu ft)
  • CAFE is set by the NHTSA. It is based on footprint (Wheelbase x Track)
  • The fuel economy posted on the window sticker of a new car is set by the EPA, based on the CAFE number, but adjusted down by ~ 25% to get the combined rating.
(Yes, it is confusing to have two different government bodies talking about fuel economy and using different ratings for the same car)
  • The Fit has a footprint of 40.3 sq ft so it is required to get 49 mpg (CAFE) or 37 mpg (EPA).
  • The Civic has a footprint of 45.4 sq ft so it is required to get 44 mpg CAFE or 33 mpg (EPA)

If you take the same platform and lift the vehicle a little bit a car becomes a "Light Truck"
  • The Honda CRV is built on the same platform as the Civic and is a very similar size (46.4 sq ft) but because it is a light truck it is only required to get 36 mpg (CAFE) or 27 mpg (EPA)
  • Same with the HR-V built on fit platform. It has a footprint of 43.3 sq ft and is required to get 38 mpg (CAFE) or 29 mpg (EPA)

Also cars must increase fuel economy by 5% per year while "light trucks" only have to improve by 3.5%. The lower standards and smaller yearly increases are part of what is driving the push for automakers to replace cars with crossovers.

Last edited by JSH; 07-23-2020 at 09:54 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (07-23-2020), redpoint5 (01-30-2024)
Old 07-23-2020, 10:35 PM   #630 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Great explanations, JSH. Thanks. Not for nothing, this seems like some serious detail of the policy... you geek out on that or is such knowledge a professional hazard?

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com