03-26-2008, 01:48 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Swapping in a higher temp thermostat
So, the Paseo look like it needs a new thermostat. I went online and browsed over the selection I have. It seems the stock thermostat is set to 180°F (82°C). Now, I've heard of guys using higher temp thermostats and getting better mileage. So, I continued digging and found I can get a 192°F (89°C) thermostat for the car. Hurray. Now, why does this help? What does it hurt? OEMs must not use 192°F stock for a reason. I'm thinking it probably hurts power output as ignition timing may need to be retarded due to insufficient cooling and hotspot developing. I'm not sure why hotter would be better except that you loose less energy through your coolant system.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 02:06 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 500
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
192-195 is stock on most cars Ive come across.
__________________
'05 Outback XT, 19 mpg
BP-turbo 93 Festiva (long gone)
1/4 mile - 12.50@111.5
Best MPG - 36.8
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 02:14 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
The thermostat on my 2008 starts to open at 177°F and is fully open at 201°F.
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 05:22 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Liberti
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
I also do not understand the logic behind running a higher temp. thermostat. Theoretically, wouldn't you be lowering efficiency by increasing the temp. of the cold reservoir? Then again, I'm wondering what the true cold reservoir is...the coolant or the air.
The equation I'm thinking of is the Carnot Theorem: 1 - Tc/Th
I can't really think of any benefits...
- LostCause
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 07:08 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Hello -
I am not an authority, but I have read on forums that the higher temp means that the engine is running more efficiently. The analogy would be a cold engine in the morning that does not become "efficient" until it is all warmed up.
If you are an auto manufacturer, I think that you are engineering with two goals in mind. Efficiency *and* reliability. The "balanced" response is to get the engine to be hot enough to run efficiently, but cool enough to be as far away from the "overheat zone" as possible. If you want reliability, you choose the T-Stat that gives you that compromise.
Also, you are designing the cooling system for the broad majority spectrum of drivers. Most drivers are not the "feather foots" that we are, so the cooling system needs to serve their driving habits, not ours.
As an Ecomodder, we are doing mods that "push" the engine for more fuel efficiency. As a result, we have to monitor the engine's health to a greater degree. We have to be vigilant, just like someone who puts a high-performance mod onto their car.
I have the hotter T-Stat. I used to run at about 180 degrees F. Now I run at 190 degrees F.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 07:25 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
You had to see this comming.
Did it make a noticable difference?
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 07:27 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
British Ecomod Hypermiler
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Coast, England
Posts: 101
The AXe - SOLD - '97 Citroen Citroen AX 1.1i 5 Door 90 day: 46.78 mpg (US) Foci - '03 Ford Ford Focus Tdci Ghia Estate 90 day: 64.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
IIRC the reason for higher engine temps for economy are:
1) the higher the engine temp the lower the friction (mainly due to design clearances and pumping of fluids),
2) also the better the vapourisation of fuel prior to combustion leads to more complete combustion (a more homogenious mixture)
3) and the lower the differential between combustion flame temperature and piston/cylinder/combustion chamber temperature.
The chamber temperature is an interesting one as the heat released to the metal by the flame (and hence the loss of energy to the coolant) is actually less the higher the engine temperature. This means that more energy is available to expand the gasses in the cylinder and propel the vehicle.
Ideally the engine would run at the same temperature as the combustion flame, so there would be no heat rejection to the coolant and therefore no energy loss & perfect efficiency
__________________
1997 Citroen AX 1.1i SPI
2003 Ford Focus 1.8 Tdci estate
Ecomods: See my garage
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 07:44 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
Thermal losses accounting for roughly 65% of all the energy spent in city driving, there's a lot to gain in reducing those losses.
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 09:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Daox -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
You had to see this comming.
Did it make a noticable difference?
|
Good question. I made the switch in my early less-accurate data recording days. ... dig dig dig ... Ok, here are my gaslogs :
1999 Saturn SW2 with switch to hotter T-Stat
Code:
BEFORE
Stock T-Stat Miles Gal(US) MPG
08/31/2006 192.00 4.84 39.66
09/03/2006 148.00 3.23 45.82
09/07/2006 187.00 6.53 28.63
09/10/2006 140.00 3.64 38.46
09/13/2006 170.00 4.19 40.57
09/16/2006 202.00 6.85 29.48
09/19/2006 259.00 6.94 37.31
09/22/2006 265.00 7.04 37.64
09/26/2006 288.00 7.15 40.27
09/29/2006 275.00 6.99 39.34
TOTAL 2126.00 57.40 37.04
AFTER
Hotter T-Stat Miles Gal(US) MPG
10/02/2006 219.00 6.90 31.73
10/07/2006 279.00 7.00 39.85
10/11/2006 274.00 7.30 37.53
10/16/2006 305.00 7.25 42.06
10/20/2006 292.00 6.00 48.66(*)
10/23/2006 187.00 6.05 30.90
10/26/2006 232.00 5.72 40.55
10/31/2006 265.00 6.25 42.40
11/02/2006 246.00 6.30 39.04
11/07/2006 260.00 6.10 42.62
TOTAL 2559.00 64.87 39.45
39.45 / 37.04 = 1.0548 => 5.5% increase in MPG.
Soooooo, it appears that I got a +5% increase in MPG. Here are my only modifications during this time :
Code:
2006/09/30 - Switched to 192-195 Coolant Thermostat (Napa Part #THM268)
2006/10/28 - Front wheel spoilers (modest aerodynamic upgrade)
(*) Now, here's the rub. On October 19, 2006, I discovered the P&G (Pulse and Glide) driving strategy. This was "mild" engine-on P&G, but my daily runs improved.
Therefore, after October 19th, I cannot say if it was the T-Stat or the modified driving style, .
CarloSW2
|
|
|
03-26-2008, 09:06 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EV OR DIESEL
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
|
Efficiency improvement simple, you are wasting less heat from combustion in to the cylinder walls/ head.
+ other things.
I didn't believe it at first, but it is true.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
|
|
|
|