Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-23-2018, 09:29 AM   #771 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 7,909

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 124.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 180
Thanked 2,527 Times in 1,973 Posts
The whole J1772, CHAdeMO, css charing protocols are built around non standard voltage batteries.
I don't know if tesla has a standard voltage.
The newest CHAdeMO standard does like 300 to 750 volts.

I find it interesting tesla can rely on CHAdeMO and css chargers if you have the adapter cord.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-23-2018, 12:47 PM   #772 (permalink)
JSH
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 866

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)

Dieselgate - '14 VW Jetta Sportwagen TDI
90 day: 38.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 407 Times in 288 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by roflwaffle View Post
If NHTSA doesn't want to compare vehicles in different weight classes, they shouldn't calculate and publish VSS' for them.
I suspect the NHTSA expects most automakers will not misuse that data to mislead the public.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2018, 04:44 PM   #773 (permalink)
Duck duck duck
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,508

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 53.73 mpg (US)

It - '09 Hyundai I10 Active Cool
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,353
Thanked 1,871 Times in 1,201 Posts
1,000 model 3's per day... and maintaining it.

https://electrek.co/2018/11/30/tesla...-reduce-costs/
Quote:
Tesla has achieved its goal of producing 1,000 Model 3 vehicles in a day, which would result in 7,000 units per week, but it is now focusing on maintaining that production rate and reducing costs.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.14 Gm or 0.09 MM.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 12:19 PM   #774 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 8,410

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 36.67 mpg (US)

Mom's grandmamobile - '06 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 5,594
Thanked 1,578 Times in 1,199 Posts
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000, which is a problem because they are aiming for a $35,000 base model. On Twitter Musk said that if they sold the $35,000 version now they would die. Musk also reportedly gave the largest cause of their problems:

Quote:
Body production currently appears to be our limiting factor, so it needs the most support right now.
Jason Torchinsky then writes:

Quote:
[T]hey need to leverage the relative portability of their technology and partner with an automaker that as yet has no clearly defined future plans for electric vehicles, yet who are large enough to be a major automaker. I can think of two companies that would fit that description quite well at the moment: Subaru and Mazda.
Quote:
Tesla would sell Model 3 chassis and associated software and hardware to their partner company, who would engineer and design bodies (and all the associated interior parts, etc) for the Tesla-powered chassis.

There could be whole lines of Tesla-powered cars. Subaru could have a Tesla-Outback and Mazda a Tesla Mazda 3—anything that was roughly the same wheelbase as the Model 3 chassis. There could be multiple bodies and types of cars made for the Tesla skateboard chassis, and they could be built by companies with plenty of experience.
What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:02 PM   #775 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,339
Thanks: 3,548
Thanked 4,746 Times in 3,779 Posts
Quote:
There could be whole lines of Tesla-powered cars. Subaru could have a Tesla-Outback
I'm updating my imagineering on this, one of my favorite pictures. Instead of Subaru Forester I'd drop a Vanagon body on a Tesla Model 3 chassis.

__________________
.
God's blessing on this wonderful world!
_________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:14 PM   #776 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 833
Thanks: 36
Thanked 207 Times in 173 Posts
You just like the cannon on top
__________________
2000 F250 7.3 CC 20+ MPG @ 10000 #
2013 Golf tdi 47.5 mpg neutered, 1500 mi beer run
1988 Ranger EV Volt batts>> 18,000 MPG and climbing. Rag overhaul.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:43 PM   #777 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,339
Thanks: 3,548
Thanked 4,746 Times in 3,779 Posts
The raven of peace perched on the gat. Or Hello Kitty.
__________________
.
God's blessing on this wonderful world!
_________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
wdb (12-02-2018)
Old 12-01-2018, 07:41 PM   #778 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Saskatoon, canada
Posts: 1,433

ChargE (not yet running) - '92 Mazda MX6 LX
90 day: 33.89 mpg (US)

Ford Prefect - '18 Ford F150 XLT XTR
Thanks: 730
Thanked 528 Times in 423 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000, which is a problem because they are aiming for a $35,000 base model. On Twitter Musk said that if they sold the $35,000 version now they would die. Musk also reportedly gave the largest cause of their problems:



Jason Torchinsky then writes:





What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
I think it will be tough for Elon to trust any other company to add to their base, then call it a Subaru Tesla-outback .. for example. Elon has trust issues. He likes to control his own destiny. And perhaps the trust issues are justified, given Tesla's lack of success off-loading the design of the falcon door hardware, Model S door handles, etc etc.

I'm not sure why no one is presently partnering with Tesla to get the skateboard base and doing their own body, interior, etc to get an electric car to market quickly, not calling it a Tesla anything. The RAV4 worked fine for Toyota .. but that's stopped. Wasn't there another company that used Tesla power electronics and motors?

Perhaps it comes down to a Not-Invented-Here issue? Or too proud to farm out engineering, even to a company with proven expertise? Not wanting to give Tesla credit, given that Elon can have just a *BIT* of a EGO when it comes to such things ...
__________________
In THEORY there is no difference between Theory and Practice
In PRACTICE there IS!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thingstodo For This Useful Post:
wdb (12-02-2018)
Old 12-02-2018, 04:39 AM   #779 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,831

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.07 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,236
Thanked 2,619 Times in 1,938 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000...

What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
Based on the tear-down of the long range version, it was estimated that Tesla could come near break even on a $35k "standard range" version.

My guess is they are there already, but it's best to push a narrative that pushes people on the fence into slightly higher tiers of expense (and profitability) than they had originally planned for. After all, if you are still production constrained, especially by body, then why sell cheaper versions of the car?

Tesla doesn't have a skateboard; it has a whole engineered car just like every car has been designed. If they had a skateboard, then the frame PN for the Model 3 would be the same as the X, and same as the S. They don't have a skateboard. It's all purpose built.

That said, Tesla has no reason to slap batteries into the same old ICE chassis that everyone else makes. The whole point is to re-imagine transportation. ICE-based EVs are terrible and need to go away. Partnering with another major automotive company is idiotic.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (12-02-2018)
Old 12-02-2018, 05:54 AM   #780 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 8,410

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 36.67 mpg (US)

Mom's grandmamobile - '06 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 5,594
Thanked 1,578 Times in 1,199 Posts
Redpoint, Tesla is doing great on it's own? I have read the body is heavy because they use too many body panels that need to be joined. If they used fewer panels it would be cheaper and easier. We have had those super exciting discussions of panel gaps. Why not borrow from industry experts for just the body? They have a revolutionary drivetrain, why reinvent the body?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com