11-23-2018, 09:29 AM
|
#771 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,568 Times in 2,832 Posts
|
The whole J1772, CHAdeMO, css charing protocols are built around non standard voltage batteries.
I don't know if tesla has a standard voltage.
The newest CHAdeMO standard does like 300 to 750 volts.
I find it interesting tesla can rely on CHAdeMO and css chargers if you have the adapter cord.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-23-2018, 12:47 PM
|
#772 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roflwaffle
If NHTSA doesn't want to compare vehicles in different weight classes, they shouldn't calculate and publish VSS' for them.
|
I suspect the NHTSA expects most automakers will not misuse that data to mislead the public.
|
|
|
11-30-2018, 04:44 PM
|
#773 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,246 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
1,000 model 3's per day... and maintaining it.
https://electrek.co/2018/11/30/tesla...-reduce-costs/
Quote:
Tesla has achieved its goal of producing 1,000 Model 3 vehicles in a day, which would result in 7,000 units per week, but it is now focusing on maintaining that production rate and reducing costs.
|
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
12-01-2018, 12:19 PM
|
#774 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000, which is a problem because they are aiming for a $35,000 base model. On Twitter Musk said that if they sold the $35,000 version now they would die. Musk also reportedly gave the largest cause of their problems:
Quote:
Body production currently appears to be our limiting factor, so it needs the most support right now.
|
Jason Torchinsky then writes:
Quote:
[T]hey need to leverage the relative portability of their technology and partner with an automaker that as yet has no clearly defined future plans for electric vehicles, yet who are large enough to be a major automaker. I can think of two companies that would fit that description quite well at the moment: Subaru and Mazda.
|
Quote:
Tesla would sell Model 3 chassis and associated software and hardware to their partner company, who would engineer and design bodies (and all the associated interior parts, etc) for the Tesla-powered chassis.
There could be whole lines of Tesla-powered cars. Subaru could have a Tesla-Outback and Mazda a Tesla Mazda 3—anything that was roughly the same wheelbase as the Model 3 chassis. There could be multiple bodies and types of cars made for the Tesla skateboard chassis, and they could be built by companies with plenty of experience.
|
What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
|
|
|
12-01-2018, 03:02 PM
|
#775 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,497
Thanks: 8,060
Thanked 8,860 Times in 7,314 Posts
|
Quote:
There could be whole lines of Tesla-powered cars. Subaru could have a Tesla-Outback
|
I'm updating my imagineering on this, one of my favorite pictures. Instead of Subaru Forester I'd drop a Vanagon body on a Tesla Model 3 chassis.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
12-01-2018, 03:14 PM
|
#776 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,354
Thanks: 526
Thanked 1,187 Times in 1,047 Posts
|
You just like the cannon on top
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
12-01-2018, 03:43 PM
|
#777 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,497
Thanks: 8,060
Thanked 8,860 Times in 7,314 Posts
|
The raven of peace perched on the gat. Or Hello Kitty.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-01-2018, 07:41 PM
|
#778 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Saskatoon, canada
Posts: 1,488
Thanks: 746
Thanked 565 Times in 447 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000, which is a problem because they are aiming for a $35,000 base model. On Twitter Musk said that if they sold the $35,000 version now they would die. Musk also reportedly gave the largest cause of their problems:
Jason Torchinsky then writes:
What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
|
I think it will be tough for Elon to trust any other company to add to their base, then call it a Subaru Tesla-outback .. for example. Elon has trust issues. He likes to control his own destiny. And perhaps the trust issues are justified, given Tesla's lack of success off-loading the design of the falcon door hardware, Model S door handles, etc etc.
I'm not sure why no one is presently partnering with Tesla to get the skateboard base and doing their own body, interior, etc to get an electric car to market quickly, not calling it a Tesla anything. The RAV4 worked fine for Toyota .. but that's stopped. Wasn't there another company that used Tesla power electronics and motors?
Perhaps it comes down to a Not-Invented-Here issue? Or too proud to farm out engineering, even to a company with proven expertise? Not wanting to give Tesla credit, given that Elon can have just a *BIT* of a EGO when it comes to such things ...
__________________
In THEORY there is no difference between Theory and Practice
In PRACTICE there IS!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thingstodo For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-02-2018, 04:39 AM
|
#779 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,735
Thanks: 4,315
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
In that source they mention that each model 3 costs about $38,000...
What do you guys think? I do not think this is the first time that I have read Musk is hurting himself by trying to reinvent everything.
|
Based on the tear-down of the long range version, it was estimated that Tesla could come near break even on a $35k "standard range" version.
My guess is they are there already, but it's best to push a narrative that pushes people on the fence into slightly higher tiers of expense (and profitability) than they had originally planned for. After all, if you are still production constrained, especially by body, then why sell cheaper versions of the car?
Tesla doesn't have a skateboard; it has a whole engineered car just like every car has been designed. If they had a skateboard, then the frame PN for the Model 3 would be the same as the X, and same as the S. They don't have a skateboard. It's all purpose built.
That said, Tesla has no reason to slap batteries into the same old ICE chassis that everyone else makes. The whole point is to re-imagine transportation. ICE-based EVs are terrible and need to go away. Partnering with another major automotive company is idiotic.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-02-2018, 05:54 AM
|
#780 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Redpoint, Tesla is doing great on it's own? I have read the body is heavy because they use too many body panels that need to be joined. If they used fewer panels it would be cheaper and easier. We have had those super exciting discussions of panel gaps. Why not borrow from industry experts for just the body? They have a revolutionary drivetrain, why reinvent the body?
|
|
|
|