04-01-2016, 10:49 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Sacramento, California
Posts: 233
Thanks: 237
Thanked 59 Times in 41 Posts
|
Tesla Model 3
So what does everyone think of the newest Tesla Model 3?
- What do you think about the front end including the lack of a grill?
- What do you think of the full Panoramic roof ?
- What do you think of the Specs?
- What do you think of the steel and aluminum mix now?
...Personally I am not a huge fan of the front end, but I may change my mind about that. I think they could do a better job at making that lack of grill look a little less blah feeling.
Over all I am a big fan!!!  
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Insight for life For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
04-01-2016, 10:54 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 659 Times in 474 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-01-2016, 11:00 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,864
Thanks: 3,372
Thanked 2,871 Times in 1,807 Posts
|
Technically, it is a Model ☰.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-01-2016, 11:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Growin a stash
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 585
Thanks: 339
Thanked 204 Times in 152 Posts
|
I like it, I like it, and I like it. And I think the front end makes it look like an angler fish
__________________
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ME_Andy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-02-2016, 10:43 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Tyrant-at-large
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,629
Thanks: 176
Thanked 1,424 Times in 747 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Technically, it is a Model ☰.
|
Tesla itself doesn't seem to mind calling it the "Model 3" on their own website, so they probably won't care if the rest of us do too.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2016, 11:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,735
Thanks: 1,571
Thanked 3,508 Times in 2,195 Posts
|
It's begging for a fake grille like the aftermarket used to sell for Corvairs.
 |
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-03-2016, 04:27 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Newb
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,048
Thanks: 2,678
Thanked 3,153 Times in 2,347 Posts
|
- What do you think about the front end including the lack of a grill?
Looks great. No grill will be the norm in the future, and grills will look horribly outdated. A grill will only remind people of how crude our transportation was back in the day of using a fraction of generated heat to propel a vehicle, while radiating, conducting, and convecting the majority of the heat away.
- What do you think of the full Panoramic roof ?
Haven't seen it yet. Probably neat, but there had better be a way to reflect sunlight out of the cabin to keep it from becoming an oven.
- What do you think of the Specs?
215 mile range. 0-60 MPH in 6 seconds. Supercharging. Autopilot. $35k... if the car delivers on all these things, they nailed it.
- What do you think of the steel and aluminum mix now?
Don't know anything about that. What's new about steel and aluminum? Seems like standard materials for a car, and it's probably standard for good reason (cost, strength).
Last edited by redpoint5; 04-07-2016 at 03:39 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-03-2016, 05:52 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,304
Thanks: 43
Thanked 386 Times in 290 Posts
|
The front end looks fine to me. It's the boring sedan shape (particularly at the rear) that I don't appreciate. Looks like a boring old BWM from the a-pillars back. It needs something back there to stop it just being another boring looking grocery getter. Perhaps if it were a hatchback or otherwise not swept down so much...?
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2016, 08:18 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,302 Posts
|
At $35k they have a real winner,which is reflected by the orders they have received.
Price-addressed
Range-addressed
Long term reliability, battery life, resale value?
Factor in a realistic cost per mile including the real world battery life and replacement cost.
There WILL be many early adopters. I'm just very skeptical about the price, but I really hope they can keep it at $35k.
regards
mech
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-03-2016, 09:59 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Newb
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 8,048
Thanks: 2,678
Thanked 3,153 Times in 2,347 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79
It needs something back there to stop it just being another boring looking grocery getter. Perhaps if it were a hatchback or otherwise not swept down so much...?
|
It is a hatchback, it just doesn't appear that way. I'd much prefer it to have an efficient aerodynamic shape than to look less boring. I spend less than 1% of my time looking at the car from the outside, and it would be more annoying to have reduced range just to get kids to look and point at the car as it creeps to the nearest charging station.
Perhaps they could have designed it for both aesthetics and efficiency, but in my mind they go hand in hand. The Model S looks fantastic. The Model 3 isn't bad looking either.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
