Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2012, 04:12 PM   #21 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
How bad does your intake look from EGR?

On my diesel the intake sluge was nearly 1/4 inch thick in some places from 20+ years of EGR.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-12-2012, 06:17 PM   #22 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
I need to look. I removed and cleaned my intake 2 years ago (70k miles) and it was pretty clogged. I haven't checked it since, but I bought an EGR valve that (hopefully) doesn't weep oil, so I can inspect the manifold when I install that.

I now have 110k miles.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 10:35 PM   #23 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
How bad does your intake look from EGR?

On my diesel the intake sluge was nearly 1/4 inch thick in some places from 20+ years of EGR.
Ours had a hole the size of a drinking straw for air to go through and $800 later will be repaired.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:28 PM   #24 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
If you manage to delete EGR safely let me know, my folks need to clean the intake and turbo nearly every year because of EGR, I found a guy with a Vag com but our car was inop at that time so we couldn't change anything.

Ah well, see if I can find him again.
I have done it. Here is a picture of the device I made, you wire this to your MAF harness. To disable the valve, you just need to plug the line with a ball bearing and re-insert the hose on the valve. It's quite stealthy; the CEL stays off and the EGR appears connected and appears to work, even if you look at it with VAG-COM.


__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 09:09 PM   #25 (permalink)
Calibration Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 86

Subie - '00 Subaru Impreza STi JDM
90 day: 22.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
I did some testing on a '06 TDI 1.9l. I disabled the EGR right in the ECU. It did not make a statistically significant difference in the fuel economy. I did the same with a brand new DDI engine and it went horribly wrong. Threw about a dozen DPF codes and went into limp mode. It's not for everyone that's for sure.

Also on diesel EGR I've had a number of Volvo highway tractors who wanted their EGR removed because the valves are about $1800 and seem to fail about twice a year. On those we recorded almost 0.2MPG loss in fuel economy over about 10,000ga of fuel.

Is there a specific reason why you would want to remove EGR?
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 10:30 PM   #26 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
I think I have laid out my case in other threads, but I wanted to test the effects on fuel mileage, and it looks like it has a negligible effect on the ALH TDI. EGR deletion improved the fuel mileage on my Jeep Liberty CRD, and those had a high rate of EGR valve failures as well, so it made a lot of sense for that vehicle. The TDI, apparently not so much, but it will reduce intake clogging and may also improve CO and particulate emissions.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 12:36 AM   #27 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hackish View Post
Is there a specific reason why you would want to remove EGR?
Pros: On larger Diesel vehicles EGR hurts fuel economy, EGR clogs the intake with soot and sluge, EGR causes them to run hotter (can be a problem for larger hard working engines), EGR is one more thing to break and spend money on yet is unnessary for operation, Increases PM and CO (Carbon monoxide).

Cons, EGR deletion will make it take longer to get up to operating temperature and thats about it.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 11:38 AM   #28 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Mileage on my second tank with EGR re-installed spiked way up, not sure if it's the warming weather or what, I've changed nothing. But with the warmer weather, I filled with B50 and deleted the EGR again. I may alternate tanks enabled and disabled, just to see if a pattern will emerge. At this point there is no indication EGR delete improves efficiency in my TDI.
Thanks for keeping us posted on this. Just for curiosity, is your Beetle parked outdoors all night? I believe Denver's overnight lows are warmer lately and with your 20 mile commute warm-up time is surely affecting your mileage. I wish there were a way to easily disconnect EGR as soon as you make temperature. My gut feeling is that we should get better mpg without EGR. Diesels like lots of oxygen rich cool air for combustion. A friend in Golden has an ALH TDI Jetta with a removed EGR valve and he reports better highway mpg on long highway trips than I get in my PD Golf. He also has almost no defroster heat on his typical 5 mile commute in winter. Hmmm. I may have to spring for the Malone tune "in the name of science". It's pricey though.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 02:24 PM   #29 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Yes, the Beetle is parked outside overnight.

There is a guy on TDIClub who is interested in modifying my circuit to work with the engine temperature. It may be fairly easy to tap into the coolant sensor and use that to engage the EGR delete once the engine is warm. I am keeping it in mind if I do another iteration of my design.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 10:04 AM   #30 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcyclist View Post
I may have to spring for the Malone tune "in the name of science". It's pricey though.
I finally installed the Malone Stage 1 with Dynamic EGR. It allows EGR to warm engine coolant up to 150º and then EGR is disabled. The tune has made my engine run smoother and I have gained power. The Dynamic EGR seems to be helping highway mileage. I will have to finish this tank to be certain but it looks to be a 900+ mile tank.

__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com