01-13-2009, 03:32 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA
Posts: 1,340
Thanks: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Hi,
Here's a homebuilt EV that I just came across:
Jason Bloomberg's 1993 Eagle Summit Wagon
The builder wrote this on the Talk of the Nation comments on the second part of the show today, which is on EV's:
Quote:
|
Not only would I buy an electric car, but I actually already have one and intend to get another. Mine is 15 years old, goes up to 70 mph and can travel up to 50 mile. I drive it about 30 miles almost every every day. It is not a hybrid. It is 100% electric. You can see it at: Jason Bloomberg's 1993 Eagle Summit Wagon It is time that we as a nation stop being mushrooms (kept in the dark and fed manure). We should have told GM that they had to put the EV-1 back into production as a condition of their getting any taxpayer money! I bought this car and started driving it because I wanted to be putting less pollution in the air. I am working finding a way to set up solar panels and a wind-charger to offset my electrical usage (about $3.00 / MONTH) to further reduce my "carbon footprint." But, even if this was powered by the dirtiest coal plant in the U.S. it would still be generating 1/16th the pollution of the cleanest hybrid on the road.
|
Looks pretty good!
|
|
|
|
03-11-2009, 01:22 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I play with this site sometimes when I'm feeling the itch to convert a car to electric.
EV Calculator
I like this one too for battery comparisons.
Battery percent of discharge comparison
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on 07-01-2008
Longest range= 791 miles on 9.74 gallons
|
|
|
|
04-28-2009, 04:18 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 1,728
Thanks: 21
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
|
EV net efficiency flow chart
Yesterday,there was a discussion about the "actual" efficiency of a plug-in EV,from"wheeling" the power onto the grid,to the power delivered to the road surface from the traction drive in the car itself.I went into my records and found the following.The data is from GM Research Labs and Electric Power Research Institute.The numbers aren't current but may give some insight.
(1) Electric utility generation plants are given efficiencies from 34-50%,with a combined-cycle unit scoring the highest.
(2) Power transmission losses delivering the power over the grid to the household give an efficiency of 93-94%.
(3) Battery chargers are given a 90% efficiency.
(4) Storage batteries on board the car are given 80% efficiency ( this has nothing to do with it's power density).
(5) Controllers are given efficiencies as high as 98% ( Alan Cocconi's AC Propulsion using MOSFET and IGFET power transistors){his CRX loses 2kW in heat loss during full acceleration}.
(6) Electric motors are given a range of efficiency,from 75% for a conventional DC device,to 92% for a GM MagnaQuench,and 96% for Unique Mobility in Colorado.
(7) If the EV uses any type of powertrain from the motor to the drive wheel,it might be conservatively estimated at 95% efficiency.
Considering the chain of events to power down the road in my home-built Ghia EV,if I use coal-fired electricity from a conventional power plant,I might expect an overall thermal efficiency on the order of 15.4%,compared to the chemical energy of the coal.With the combined-cycle plant,overall efficiency would be 30.2%.
For a comparison,an IC-powered car,operating at constant speed at max BSFC can achieve 40% efficiency.This is why the Chevy VOLT is configured the way it is.Alternate,renewable forms of power wheeled onto the grid obviously get around the fossil-fuel CO2 challenge,however its important to realize how much energy is lost moving it around and from transforming it from one form to another.
I like Ed Begley Jr's rooftop PV array-charged EV. This is along the lines of what Hunter and Amory Lovins were advocating a couple decades ago.
|
|
|
|
04-28-2009, 05:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 848
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Since Aero posted the EV chain I'll do the fossil
Out of a 43 gallon drum 19 gallons become gasoline
drum contains 6.1x10^9j and 6-7 gallons form diesel so 26x 1.3x10^8j/(61x10^8+energy consumed in coal to refine(29.8x10^8j))=37.5%
transmission cost of 7%=34.9%
ICE efficiency typically ranges around 30% but we'll say its the max on any gasoline engine system(40% efficient) =14.0%
Transmission cost 10%=12.6%
very generous efficiency of 12.6% for the total ICE system
|
|
|
|
04-28-2009, 07:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Don't Panic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 3rd rock
Posts: 2,674
Thanks: 7
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
|
plus the electricity used to crack the crude as you noted.
__________________
"I kicked a giant mouse in the butt! Do I have to draw you a diagram?"
|
|
|
|
04-28-2009, 07:14 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 1,728
Thanks: 21
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
|
fossil
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunchosen
Since Aero posted the EV chain I'll do the fossil
Out of a 43 gallon drum 19 gallons become gasoline
drum contains 6.1x10^9j and 6-7 gallons form diesel so 26x 1.3x10^8j/(61x10^8+energy consumed in coal to refine(29.8x10^8j))=37.5%
transmission cost of 7%=34.9%
ICE efficiency typically ranges around 30% but we'll say its the max on any gasoline engine system(40% efficient) =14.0%
Transmission cost 10%=12.6%
very generous efficiency of 12.6% for the total ICE system
|
Generous indeed!With respect to the VOLT we have to consider 70% of the gasoline would be lifted,refined,and loaded in a foreign country,then transported(under US NAVY escort) to U.S.'shores,where it would be off-loaded and make it's way by truck transport and pipeline,stations receiving their fuel from tanker,via a bulk-fuel terminal.Then the electricity to lift it through the dispensing pump into the vehicle.For crude oil transports,total refining energy would have to be factored into the energy expended by the NAVY, Coast Guard,Marine Corps,Seals,ARMY,Air Force,Delta Force,CIA,NRO,NSA,FBI,etc.,would not be reflected into the pump price nor "street" energy balance.In 1991,these costs were estimated at $2.31/gallon.I have no idea how one could arrive at the amount of energy this activity absorbs.So one kinda turns a jaundiced eye towards gasoline an Diesel when contemplating the big picture.
|
|
|
|
08-16-2009, 12:54 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
is anyone right?
Good thread. Good arguments. Statistics can be skewed any way you want.
Which is cheaper? No one really knows, now do they?
aereohead - i suppose there are no security costs for the magically produced electricity. Let's not forget that some US power plants run off oil. The nuke plants might also have a security cost? The natural gas? The coal industry? Naa, that's just free and has nobody looking over it.
The EV people should keep up the good work. Just remember that when you pound that green drum about what a good citizen you are, you have only moved your carbon footprint to somebody else's back yard. Guess that means you don't give a flyin f about your fellow human or the world in general.
There seems to be a lot of the NIMBY syndrome going on world wide. "I need power for my (insert here whatever, in you cases, cars) but no more generation plants or transmission lines. At least not near ME.
I singled you out because you chose to bring up
Quote:
|
For crude oil transports,total refining energy would have to be factored into the energy expended by the NAVY, Coast Guard,Marine Corps,Seals,ARMY,Air Force,Delta Force,CIA,NRO,NSA,FBI,etc.,would not be reflected into the pump price nor "street" energy balance.In 1991,these costs were estimated at $2.31/gallon.
|
The highest average gas price for 1991 was $1.169. So that means the actual price should be $3.479? At an average price of 9.08 cents per kWh in 1991, what do you suppose the actual cost of security on the generation, transmission and distribution was? And what agencies were involved? Now in 2009 what security do suppose might be involved?
Focus on your objective, developing electric vehicles, and stop arguing about who is "better" All vehicles use too much energy and we need to address that. We are way too dependant on foriegn sources of energy and need to address that. Just stop always having to be right or wrong!
Last edited by taredog; 08-16-2009 at 12:57 AM..
Reason: moved decimal point on 116.9 to 1.169 lest someone focus on that instead of the rest of the post
|
|
|
|
|