Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-05-2014, 11:44 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
So, it sounds like you're filling up often, then. Is that so you can test your changes more frequently?

If I were doing that, I'd try to come up with some sort of graduated flask in place of the stock fuel tank for more accurate readings. My "full tank" fillups are an attempt to increase accuracy in the mpg calculation. You can "even out" the variation by keeping an average of all your fillups, but then it's harder to isolate the effect of each change.

Your car's too old for a ScanGauge, right? Cuz those things really help zero-in on what works and what doesn't.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-06-2014, 07:05 AM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
cowmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,659

Princess Carriage - '20 Ford Explorer Limited

Silver - '22 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT w/tow pkg
Maverick Hybrids
90 day: 41.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 128
Thanked 764 Times in 461 Posts
Gaud, if I tracked my gas mileage in short enough trips it would look like I'm getting 200 MPG. You need to start a fuel log, and track your fuel consumption by the tank, in real world driving conditions, to have any credibility in my world.

You speak very formal garbled up Engrish, much like that rich Nigerian prince that keeps trying to give me money! I am beginning to doubt that you're even human, maybe you're computer generated.

At this point I'm only subscribing to this thread because your pointless ramblings are kind of amusing, but if you have something real to share, you'd better share it fast, cause I'm starting to get bored here!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cowmeat For This Useful Post:
deejaaa (07-06-2014)
Old 07-06-2014, 08:11 AM   #53 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
CRap FRANNLK!!!!!!!!!!!!It's bad enough "he" does it, don't you do it to!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 08:13 AM   #54 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
At this point I'm only subscribing to this thread because your pointless ramblings are kind of amusing, but if you have something real to share, you'd better share it fast, cause I'm starting to get bored here!
It's like watching a car wreck, or Fox News. You know you shouldn't, but you just can't stop watching.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 08:37 AM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaud29 View Post
Well let me say to you all, everytime I fill up, I check my gas mileage. I keep track of my gas mileage on each and every vehicle that I have. The best for example that I've ever got on my '81 Honda CX500Custom was after I attached a Vetter, "Rooster" fork mounted fairing, it went from the best being 56mpg up to 58mpg. I'll show all of that if that's what it's all about here. Not a problem But: I don't use "normally" anything but : "Tenths" of a gallon!
I don't check my gas gauge when I fill up. I can usually predict within a couple 1/10ths gallon how much the fill will be.

I CHECK MY ODOMETER.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 09:17 AM   #56 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yuma, Az
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well fellas, every time when I put gas into my vehicle I fill it to where there are no bubbles. I am topped off to where I can see the gas right there and sometimes it spills out it is so full. I then take the miles that I've driven be it a 100+ miles of city driving, and then divide the gas used by the miles driven. I have the proper sized tires on my vehicles and it's checked also by my GARMIN. I don't have a SCAN gauge yes, because my vehicles are too old for that. That is how I come up with my mileage claims.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 09:45 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
I doubt that dumping fuel on the ground will earn you much support here. Evaporative emissions control systems can be destroyed by overfilling and you are not allowing for any expansion of the fuel in hot ambient temperatures.

More reasons to seriously question credibility.

I never fill my bike unless I am going to ride far enough to use enough fuel to keep the engine heat from forcing fuel vapor out of the tank where I can smell it in my garage. I also use a fan to cool off the bike to keep the residual heat from the engine from heating the fuel tank and creating unwanted fuel vapor.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (07-06-2014)
Old 07-06-2014, 11:43 AM   #58 (permalink)
Not banned yet
 
deejaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas Coast, close to Houston
Posts: 907

Blue - '03 Chevy S-10, LS
Thanks: 423
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
Gaud, if I tracked my gas mileage in short enough trips it would look like I'm getting 200 MPG. You need to start a fuel log, and track your fuel consumption by the tank, in real world driving conditions, to have any credibility in my world.

You speak very formal garbled up Engrish, much like that rich Nigerian prince that keeps trying to give me money! I am beginning to doubt that you're even human, maybe you're computer generated.

At this point I'm only subscribing to this thread because your pointless ramblings are kind of amusing, but if you have something real to share, you'd better share it fast, cause I'm starting to get bored here!
"you" must have been "reading" my "mind". what i wanted to "say" but am too "lazy" to do it. thanks!
__________________
2003 S-10, 2.2L, 5 speed, ext cab long bed.
So far: DRL delete, remove bed mount toolbox.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 11:53 AM   #59 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Might have suffered a prop strike,........,,,,,,,,
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 12:24 PM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaud29 View Post
The best for example that I've ever got on my '81 Honda CX500Custom was after I attached a Vetter, "Rooster" fork mounted fairing, it went from the best being 56mpg up to 58mpg.
Well, gosh, and "gosh golly", I also used to own a Honda CX500. But I averaged 60 MPG without any "gadgets", "GADGETS", or gadgets!!!! The "secret" was a steady hand on the throttle, AKA DWL.

__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com